本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

completeness-auditor

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Purpose

Check deliverable evidence, not whether every invoked skill left a ceremonial report.

Lean Checks

Per active Qx, require as applicable:

  • manifest;
  • method card;
  • human decision ledger;
  • risk-probe summary;
  • latest run summary.

Lean completeness does not require final reports, freeze, paper, or G6 artifacts.

Submission Checks

Per Qx require:

  • final method explanation;
  • current language review JSON with all required named checks passing;
  • final result analysis;
  • robustness report;
  • solution package;
  • current frozen numbers;
  • paper section and referenced figures.

Globally require symbol table, assumptions, references, consistency audit, completeness audit, and QA report.

Workflow

  1. Read rigor_profile.
  2. Resolve active Qx from manifests or artifacts.
  3. Check required artifacts and semantic fields.
  4. Check staleness only against materially cited evidence.
  5. Accept documented legacy equivalents during migration.
  6. Save paper/audits/completeness_audit.md only in submission/final mode.

Status

  • PRESENT: required evidence exists and is current.
  • MISSING: required evidence absent.
  • INSUFFICIENT: artifact exists but required semantic fields/checks are missing.
  • STALE: cited material evidence changed after approval/review.
  • NOT_APPLICABLE: justified by task/profile.

Rules

  • Do not require ≥5 prose pass items.
  • Do not require a report just because a skill ran.
  • Do not mark a decision stale for unrelated code, formatting, or file changes.
  • Do not treat legacy artifact count as proof of semantic completeness.
  • Do not repair artifacts during audit.

Verification

  • Requirements match the active profile.
  • Every gap names the missing evidence and producer/owner.
  • Staleness links to a material changed source.
  • Final verdict is PASSED only when all submission requirements are satisfied.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

Build the authoritative final method explanation for a submission-ready subquestion from the method card, human decision ledger, code plan, final results, and robustness evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0572026年9月24日 更新

zhnnky329 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する