本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

figure-table-planner

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md2.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Purpose

Make every visual evidence-bearing. Prefer fewer useful visuals over a decorative inventory.

Inputs

  • method card and decision ledger;
  • run summaries and final result analysis;
  • robustness evidence;
  • solution package and frozen numbers in submission mode;
  • existing figures/tables.

Figure Types

  • Type 1 diagnostic: internal debugging; never in the paper.
  • Type 2 comparison: main vs usable baseline or a genuinely tested alternative; optional in paper.
  • Type 3 paper: directly supports a main claim; required only when the claim benefits materially from a visual.
  • Type 4 appendix: supplementary evidence referenced from the main text.

Workflow

  1. List verified claims that need visual or exact tabular support.
  2. Reuse an existing artifact when it already communicates the claim.
  3. For each proposed visual record:
    • ID and Qx;
    • type;
    • source artifact and frozen claim IDs when applicable;
    • one core claim;
    • chart/table form;
    • target section;
    • status and render needs.
  4. Ask the human to confirm judgment-bearing Type 3 claims through one compact choice card when they are not already in the decision ledger.
  5. Save methods/Qx/qx_figure_table_plan.md only when durable planning is needed. In lean exploration, a compact in-conversation plan is sufficient.

Planning Heuristics

  • Use tables for exact values, parameters, and small comparisons.
  • Use plots for trends, distributions, sensitivity, or many-item comparisons.
  • Use diagrams for mechanisms, dependencies, and workflows.
  • A main-vs-baseline figure needs compatible metrics and the same evaluation setup.
  • Do not create a multi-method comparison merely to imply breadth.

Rules

  • Type 1 never enters the paper.
  • Type 3 uses final validated sources and a human-confirmed core claim.
  • Do not use unresolved exploratory figures as paper evidence.
  • Do not fabricate data, captions, or claims.
  • Do not fill plans with placeholder sentinels; pause for one human choice instead.
  • Every visual must have a source and purpose.

Verification

  • Each planned visual supports a verified claim.
  • Types, sources, sections, and statuses are explicit.
  • Type 3 claims trace to human decisions and frozen evidence.
  • No unnecessary or decorative visual remains.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

Build the authoritative final method explanation for a submission-ready subquestion from the method card, human decision ledger, code plan, final results, and robustness evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1,0562026年9月24日 更新

zhnnky329 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する