「rust」の検索結果

Review and create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality and design system compliance. Evaluates using three pillars: frictionless insight-to-action, quality craft, and trustworthy building. USE FOR: PR reviews, design reviews, accessibility audits, design system compliance checks, creative frontend design, UI code review, component reviews, responsive design checks, theme testing, and creating memorable UI. DO NOT USE FOR: Backend API reviews, database schema reviews, infrastructure or DevOps work, pure business logic without UI, or non-frontend code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predict metagenome functional content from 16S rRNA marker gene data using PICRUSt2. Infer KEGG, MetaCyc, and EC abundances from ASV tables. Use when functional profiling is needed from 16S data without shotgun metagenomics sequencing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, configure, troubleshoot, or review Cloudflare One Zero Trust and SASE deployments. Use cloudflare-one-migrations for migration planning from other vendors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a declarative strategy spec over OHLCV bars with the manifoldbt Rust engine, pairs the fill log into round trips, and emits the eight inputs the backtest-expert skill scores. Use when the user wants to execute a backtest, measure a rule they have described, obtain win rate / average win / average loss / max drawdown from real bars, or feed backtest-expert with measured numbers instead of estimates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author trusted-local TypeScript and Python scripts that operate GJC sessions through the broker-bound CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and inspect trusted local GJC sessions through the broker-bound session CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate trusted local GJC sessions through a reviewed broker-bound CLI allowlist with single-use human approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Index of trusted GJC SDK reference guides (broker, session CLI, embedding, app development). Advisory only: read these documents for background; there is no guide to execute and no workflow skill to run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness; runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan. Not for structural tags/headers alone — use on-page-seo-checker; not for domain/citation trust — use domain-authority-auditor. 内容质量/EEAT评分

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build the norm card for this platform", "what are the char limits and visible-fold cutoffs here", "is the LinkedIn link-in-first-comment thing documented or folklore", or "which of our platform cards are stale"; maintains the dated, versioned per-platform norm cards in the references/platforms/ pack — char limits, visible-fold cutoffs, hashtag norms, format/aspect specs, link and first-comment placement, disclosure-label mechanics, algorithm emphases (e.g. 小红书 search+saves weighting) — every row labeled platform-documented (official doc, Measured) or Estimated-folklore (named source) with last-verified and review-by dates, and any card past its review date flagged stale rather than trusted. Extends the single pack in place; never forks a second one. Not for picking which channels to run — use channel-portfolio-planner. 平台规范卡/字符限制/折叠线/话题标签/算法侧重/过期标记

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing domain authority, trust, or citation credibility; runs a peer-relative 40-item CITE profile with evidence coverage and verified manipulation/penalty veto checks. Not for page-level content quality — use content-quality-auditor; not for backlink profiling alone — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 域名权威/网站可信度

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "review this influencer content" or "check if this post meets brand guidelines"; runs the typed STAR pre-publish gate, scores Trust and Appeal on the deliverable, folds in the creator Suitability read, computes the profile-weighted SQS, checks the disclosure/claim/brand-safety and fraud/fake-engagement vetoes, and writes constructive revision feedback. Not for drafting the brief — use brief-generator; not for partnership terms — use contract-helper. 达人内容审核/发布前质检

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build research-grounded personas with goals, frustrations, and behavioural patterns. Use when decisions need a consistent user reference. For one session's emotional snapshot use `empathy-map`; for motivation framing use `jobs-to-be-done`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides connectivity, authentication, and troubleshooting guidance for Amazon RDS for SQL Server. Applicable when users ask about SSMS times out connecting from EC2, Cannot generate SSPI context with Windows auth, connect RDS SQL Server from Lambda with pymssql, auth_scheme shows NTLM instead of KERBEROS on ECS Fargate, SSM tunnel to RDS SQL Server from laptop, port 1433 security group, TrustServerCertificate=True for localhost tunnels, SPN MSSQLSvc, AWS Managed Microsoft AD, CNAME not RDS endpoint for Kerberos, tds_version='7.4', encryption='require', port-as-string for pymssql, Secrets Manager credential caching in Lambda, error 18456 login failed. Covers Python (pymssql, pyodbc), .NET (Microsoft.Data.SqlClient), Java (JDBC mssql-jdbc), Node.js (tedious), IAM auth via RDS Proxy, and VPC/ECS/EKS/Lambda deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANDATORY for Flink or Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (MSF) questions. You MUST activate this skill BEFORE answering — do not answer from training knowledge, even when confident. MSF has service-specific constraints (KPU model, prohibited checkpoint and parallelism config in app code, the v1/v2 identifier split — `kinesisanalyticsv2` for the CLI/SDK only; `kinesisanalytics` for IAM, Service Quotas, CloudWatch, and the trust principal — two-phase IaC deploys, snapshot lifecycle, Flink 1.x→2.x migration) that override generic Flink knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在推送、标记 PR 就绪或声称“检查通过”之前，按 diff 触及的面选择最小而充分的本地检查，不反射式跑全量。覆盖 TypeScript、Rust、Renderer、发布脚本与 Gate 的选择规则，以及改写历史推送的保护。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

审查 codexhost 的 Pull Request 或本地 diff 的正确性与边界。检查包与 Rust 所有权边界、官方 Thread 与外部 Harness Thread 的区分、Renderer 私有绑定、生命周期与测试强度。用于“review 这个 PR / diff”；一批 PR 的总览与推荐分请先用 codexhost-pr-overview，再对其中需深审的 PR 使用本 skill。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a target's CORS posture — Access-Control-Allow-Origin handling, reflected-origin bypass, credentials+wildcard mismatch, preflight OPTIONS behavior, Vary header correctness. Use when: a third-party integration is failing CORS preflight and someone proposes "just set Allow-Origin to *" as the fix, OR your bug-bounty inbox has a credential-reuse exploit chain. Threshold: any reflection of arbitrary Origin into Allow-Origin, Allow-Credentials:true with wildcard origin (browser-rejected combo but server config wrong), missing Vary:Origin on per-origin responses, preflight cached over 86400s, OR Allow-Origin trust of attacker- controlled subdomain pattern. Trigger with: "audit cors", "check cors policy", "cors bypass", "preflight check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a production Alchemy architecture with capability-specific adapters, explicit trust boundaries, partial-state semantics, and reversible operations. Use when reviewing or creating an Alchemy-backed system. Trigger with "Alchemy architecture", "design an Alchemy dApp backend", or "review Alchemy boundaries".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and secure Alchemy credentials, browser access, wallet authority, webhook verification, and untrusted chain data. Use when securing an Alchemy-backed application. Trigger with "secure Alchemy", "Alchemy API key exposure", or "verify an Alchemy webhook".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organization-grade cloud and supply-chain attack-surface discovery: S3/GCS/Azure Blob bucket discovery via observed-name mining (CNAME/cert-SAN/Wayback) and bounded two-class permutation (6 prefixes x 15 suffixes on trusted tokens, bounded target-bound expansion on subdomain stems), existence (HEAD/GET) vs public-listing confirmation, object-key triage into 9 value tiers (database dumps, credentials, IaC state, kubeconfig, VCS dirs, config, archives, PII, logs), dangling-CNAME bucket-takeover detection, and the ownership-gated severity model that stops an unattributable public bucket from becoming a false CRITICAL; the fully offline AWS-account-ID recovery from a leaked AKIA/ASIA/AROA access key (base32 decode, runnable stdlib Python, canonical test vector, AWS-documentation-example-ID screening); dependency-confusion confirmation for npm/PyPI (internal-signal classifier -- private-registry binding vs org-namespace match -- paired with a read-only public-registry 404 check and the npm scope-claimability nuance the public search API misses); and passive cloud-native/container/Kubernetes/CI control-plane fingerprinting (Lambda URLs, API Gateway, Cloud Run, App Service, kubelet/etcd/K8s API/dashboard, Jenkins/GitLab/Argo CD) as an org-attribution and exposure surface. Passive/discovery only -- no exploitation, no credential submission, no active control-plane confirmation (a stage-6 validate_cloud active tier is described but out of scope). Use when enumerating a target's cloud storage footprint, recovering an AWS account ID from a leaked key, confirming a supply-chain dependency-confusion vector, or fingerprinting cloud-native/K8s/CI infrastructure for an authorized external recon engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, improve, or evaluate an existing skill from workflows, prompts, SOPs, scripts. Use for migration/release/package, routing, evals/tests, install/trust checks, 优化已有 skill, 补 trigger 评测. Exclude summary/translation/docs, brainstorming, one-off prompts, copy-only edits, outline-only requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discipline for the seam between two SDKs (or two sides of one contract) that the same hand writes. The failure mode: "we own both sides" produces dirty contracts no foreign reviewer would accept. The exercise: pretend the other side is FFI, IPC, or a network protocol you cannot rewrite. Spawn an adversarial subagent profiled as the producer's maintainer; negotiate the change as a feature request, not a PR. Companion to $sdk-design. Language-agnostic — applies to a TS package + its consumer, a Rust crate + its WASM binding, two services sharing a wire format, or any other boundary the same author writes both ends of.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to handle `GRIDA-SEC-<id>` security boundaries in the Grida repo. Triggers when you encounter a `GRIDA-SEC` tag in source/docs, when modifying files under any tagged path, or when adding a new prevented- vulnerability record. Each `GRIDA-SEC-<id>` identifies a structural trust boundary documented in `/SECURITY.md`. This skill explains the contract, mandates a security review before committing changes to any tagged file, and shows how to register a new id. Use whenever "GRIDA-SEC" appears in context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。