Cryptographic security for agentic systems — zero-trust agent networking, signed message envelopes (JWS/JWE), capability-based security (ocaps), Merkle tree audit trails, WASM sandboxing, and formal verification. Covers CLI dev tool security, mTLS between agents, permission boundaries (least privilege for AI agents), and supply chain security for skills/plugins. Activate on: "agent security", "zero trust agents", "secure agent communication", "capability-based security", "ocap", "signed messages between agents", "agent audit trail", "sandbox agent execution", "agent permissions", "mTLS agents", "cryptographic verification", "agent supply chain", "OWASP agentic", "prove agent did X", "tamper-proof agent logs". NOT for: application-level SAST scanning (use security-auditor), network firewall rules (use infrastructure), SOC2/HIPAA compliance (organizational), or prompt injection defense (use prompt-engineer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Design roadside signs and large-format ads for businesses, especially automotive dealers. Use for pylon signs, monument signs, lot banners, highway billboards, digital roadside boards, service-lane signage, used-car event signs, lease or finance campaign concepts, and other driver-at-speed messaging where legibility, offer hierarchy, and dealer ad compliance matter. Activate on "road sign", "billboard", "dealership sign", "car dealer ad", "pylon sign", "monument sign", "service lane signage", "automotive billboard", "roadside ad", "dealer lease offer", or "drive-by signage". NOT for fabrication drawings, permitting or local sign-code review, web or social ad campaigns, or full brand identity systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Build production-ready LLM applications, advanced RAG systems, and intelligent agents. Implements vector search, multimodal AI, agent orchestration, and enterprise AI integrations. Use PROACTIVELY for LLM features, chatbots, AI agents, or AI-powered applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Strategic patterns for solving intractable problems through cascading approximation, self-improvement, and heterogeneous evaluation from DeepMind's AlphaGo system
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Time-blind friendly planning, executive function support, and daily structure for ADHD brains. Specializes in realistic time estimation, dopamine-aware task design, and building systems that actually work for neurodivergent minds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Foundational concurrent computation model where actors communicate exclusively through asynchronous message passing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Conversation patterns and interaction protocols for multi-agent systems. Covers request/response, pub/sub, blackboard, delegation chains, debate, critique, consensus, fan-out/fan-in, supervisor-worker, and peer negotiation. Deep analysis of AutoGen conversation patterns, CrewAI delegation, LangGraph state passing, and FIPA-ACL performatives. Teaches how to design what agents say to each other and in what order. Activate on: "agent conversation", "agent protocol", "multi-agent debate", "agent delegation", "supervisor worker pattern", "agent voting", "consensus protocol", "fan-out fan-in", "agent negotiation", "blackboard pattern", "agent dialogue", "conversation topology", "agent handoff". NOT for: wire format or serialization (use agent-interchange-formats), orchestration infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), single agent behavior (use agentic-patterns).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Apply normative BDI reasoning to agents that must detect norms, choose which commitments to internalize, and resolve conflicts by comparing consequences. Use when obligations, prohibitions, or policies collide in autonomous systems. NOT for simple fixed-priority rules, pure constraint satisfaction, or domains where no real normative conflict exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 152026年10月14日 更新
Capture, gate, and query long-term project knowledge via the gated wiki subsystem: propose candidates, recall, or search; agents propose, humans approve. NOT for short-lived memory (mk:memory).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Systematically QA-tests a web app and fixes bugs: test, then iteratively fix, re-verify, commit each fix. Tiers: Quick, Standard, Exhaustive. Produces before/after health scores and fix evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Deep multi-source technical research with citations — tech evaluation, ecosystem/standards comparison. NOT for API docs (mk:docs-finder), codebase discovery (mk:scout), or project Q&A (mk:ask-me).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Use when designing UI components, reviewing visual design, building design systems, or checking accessibility. Auto-activates on frontend design tasks and UI reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Experimental behavioral evaluator. Drives a running artifact via browser/curl/CLI and records rubric evidence; the runner is not yet a fully implemented automated evaluation system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Systematic root-cause debugging that produces a diagnostic report (mk:fix applies the fix; mk:build-fix owns compile failures). Use for 'debug this', 'why is this broken', 'root cause'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Capture, gate, query, and render long-term project knowledge through the gated `mewkit wiki` subsystem. Use to create a wiki, propose/approve candidates (scanner-gated), hand off a skill's terminal artifact as a scanned candidate, recall context, search the FTS index, or list pages. Agents may only PROPOSE candidates; canonical pages are written only via human approve. NOT for short-lived JSON memory (see mk:memory); NOT for fetching external sources (see mk:wiki-research); NOT for HTML snapshots (see mk:wiki-render).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Use when stuck on approach (not debugging). Strategic unsticking via 7 non-default techniques: simplification cascades, collision-zone thinking, meta-pattern recognition, inversion, scale game, first principles, via negativa. Triggers on complexity spiraling, innovation block, recurring patterns across domains, forced-assumption solutions, scale uncertainty, told-it's-impossible, or bloated systems needing subtraction. For evidence-based root-cause debugging, use mk:sequential-thinking instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Use when copy-catting, replicating, or adapting features from external systems, repos, apps, or ideas into the current project. Triggers on 'copy this from', 'replicate', 'clone this feature', 'how does X do Y', 'chom', 'like how X does it', 'port from', 'build like', '1:1 copy'. NOT for packing the current project (see mk:pack); NOT for one-shot URL-to-markdown fetches (see mk:web-to-markdown).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Read-first Figma gateway via Figma MCP: analyze designs, implement Figma-to-code for 1–3 screens, extract design tokens, produce a Figma Evidence Packet for planning handoff, screenshot fallback. Advanced operations (Code Connect, canvas writes, design-system/library patterns) are gated references loaded only on explicit intent. Triggers: 'figma', 'design link', 'implement this design', 'design tokens', 'produce a Figma Evidence Packet'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Use when designing UI components, reviewing visual design, building design systems, or checking accessibility. Auto-activates on frontend design tasks and UI reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新
Session-scoped safety guardrails for destructive commands. Warns before rm -rf, DROP TABLE, force-push, git reset --hard, kubectl delete, and similar destructive operations. User can override each warning. Active for the current session only. Use when touching prod, debugging live systems, or working in a shared environment. Use when asked to "be careful", "safety mode", "prod mode", or "careful mode". NOT for scoping edits to a specific directory (see mk:freeze).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ngocsangyem/MeowKit☆ 152026年7月28日 更新