「its」の検索結果

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Carpenter — sizing a header for a bearing-wall opening, laying out and cutting stair stringers to code, checking a rough opening before a door or window goes in, deciding whether framing lumber is dry enough to close in, or field-modifying engineered lumber (I-joists, LVL) without voiding its rating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chemical Equipment Operator/Tender — deciding whether to continue or stop a reagent addition when reactor temperature exceeds its expected range, evaluating a batch record deviation's actual chemical consequence before release, following lockout/tagout before servicing equipment that processed a hazardous chemical, or verifying secondary containment readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Cardiovascular Technologist — measuring and grading a cardiac or vascular ultrasound finding, tracking contrast/anticoagulation/radiation limits during a live cath lab procedure, choosing between imaging modalities for a clinical question, or writing up a diagnostic study for physician sign-off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Brownfield Redevelopment Specialist and Site Manager — confirming landowner liability protections (BFPP/AAI) before a contaminated-site acquisition closes, matching a cleanup standard to the actual reuse plan instead of defaulting to the most conservative one, sequencing a brownfield funding stack (EPA grants, state VCP, tax credits) by eligibility dependency, or deciding whether an institutional control/deed restriction needs disclosure to a lender or buyer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Budget Analyst — reviewing a department's budget request or decision package for a new program, building or reconciling a budget-to-actual variance report, phasing costs for a new facility or position against its real start date, or advising on reserve/fund-balance adequacy ahead of a budget cycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a licensed blaster-in-charge — designing a bench or trench blast pattern, checking a shot against vibration/flyrock regulatory limits, sequencing detonator delays, handling a misfire, or reviewing explosives magazine storage and transport compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a book publisher — sizing an advance against a P&L model before an acquisition auction, setting a print run from comp-title sales data, deciding whether to keep bidding or walk in a multi-house auction, valuing subsidiary rights as part of a deal, or diagnosing why a title's early sell-through is diverging from its launch plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biologist — designing a study and identifying its true experimental unit before data collection starts, running a power analysis to size a sample, judging whether a published or preclinical finding warrants trust without independent replication, sequencing IACUC/IBC/field-permit approvals before biosafety or wildlife work begins, or scoping a grant-funded research plan against realistic funding odds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an audiovisual equipment installer/repairer — diagnosing an EDID or HDCP handshake failure between a source and a display, sizing a display's screen size and brightness for a room's viewing distance and ambient light, specifying an HDMI/HDBaseT/AVoIP signal run against its rated distance ceiling, designing conference-room speaker placement and acoustics, or drawing the install-vs-programming boundary with a control-system (Crestron/Extron/AMX) integrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a biomedical/bioengineering engineer — running a design control phase (inputs, outputs, verification, validation) for a medical device, scoring a Design FMEA and deciding whether a failure mode needs mitigation, planning a human factors/usability validation study, building a design traceability matrix, or writing a design verification or risk-mitigation report. Distinct from a regulatory-affairs-specialist (owns the submission/clearance process, not the engineering itself) and from a clinical-data-manager/biostatistician (trial data and analysis, not device design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Automotive Engineering Technician — setting up and instrumenting test equipment (strain-gauge bridges, thermocouples, load/torque sensors) to an engineer's written test plan, selecting DAQ sample rate and an SAE J211 CFC filter class for a vehicle test channel, verifying instrument calibration (torque wrench, thermocouple, load cell, shunt-cal check on a strain bridge) against a traceable standard before a test run, reducing dyno or road-load test data (SAE J1349 power correction, rainflow-counted durability damage fraction) into engineering units, and documenting test results against the engineer's target with stated margin. Distinct from an automotive engineer (owns the system-level design decisions — structure, powertrain sizing, suspension geometry, NVH) — this role installs the sensors, configures the DAQ, executes the instrumented test, and reduces the data under a design and test plan the engineer specified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an avionics technician — chasing an intermittent nav/comm or autopilot fault that "checks good" on the ground, deciding whether an avionics upgrade needs an STC or qualifies for field approval, verifying bonding resistance and wire-bundle separation on an install, cross-checking a new LRU's DO-160 environmental qualification against its install location, or writing an avionics discrepancy/return-to-service entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Architecture Teacher, Postsecondary — running studio desk crits and final jury reviews, grading design work on process and constraint-response rather than rendering polish, separating a personal design-style opinion from an objective functional or code flaw during critique, and checking whether a studio brief's precedent set is stale relative to current construction and code practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Certified Anesthesiologist Assistant (CAA) working inside an Anesthesia Care Team — building and executing an intraoperative anesthetic plan under a directing anesthesiologist, reading a vital-sign trend for anesthesia-specific emergencies (malignant hyperthermia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, awareness), deciding when a deviation is an immediate-escalation trigger versus an independently correctable event, or navigating the jurisdiction/concurrency limits of CAA practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and work with ENCODE single-cell genomics data including scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq. Use when the user asks about single-cell experiments, cell type resolution, clustering from ENCODE data, deconvolution of bulk signals using single-cell references, or comparing single-cell vs bulk profiles. Covers platform differences (10X Chromium, Smart-seq2, Drop-seq), quality limitations of single-cell data, multimodal integration (RNA+ATAC), and cross-study reproducibility concerns. Also use for cell type annotation, gene detection limits, dropout artifacts, and single-cell data structure in ENCODE.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Annotate genetic variants (GWAS hits, eQTLs, rare variants) with ENCODE functional data to interpret non-coding variation. Use when the user has variants of interest and wants to understand their regulatory context, identify causal variants from GWAS loci, assess variant impact on regulatory elements, perform enrichment testing of variant sets in tissue-specific annotations, or link variants to target genes through enhancer-gene maps. Handles the full post-GWAS workflow from variant set → tissue mapping → functional annotation → fine-mapping awareness → enrichment → variant-to-gene → prioritization. Use this skill for ANY variant interpretation task involving ENCODE chromatin, accessibility, TF binding, or 3D genome data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes git commit history and generates professional changelogs with semantic versioning, conventional commit support, and multiple output formats (Keep a Changelog, Conventional, GitHub). Use when editing CHANGELOG.md, CHANGELOG.txt, or HISTORY.md files, preparing release notes, creating releases, bumping versions, updating changelog, documenting changes, writing release notes, tracking changes, version bump, tag release, or when user mentions "changelog", "release notes", "version history", "release", "semantic versioning", or "conventional commits".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute an autonomous development loop that picks one task per iteration, implements it, verifies it, and commits the result — each iteration in a fresh context window. Use when user runs /ralph, mentions "ralph loop", "autonomous loop", "builder verifier", "run tasks automatically", "iterate on tasks", "develop autonomously", or wants an automated build-verify-commit cycle with task tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security-focused code review identifying high-confidence exploitable vulnerabilities with two-axis severity/confidence scoring, OWASP 2025 alignment, per-finding Haiku verification, and false positive filtering. Optional GitHub PR posting. Use when user runs /security-review, /review:security-review, requests a "security review", "security audit", "vulnerability scan", or mentions "find vulnerabilities", "check for exploits".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lists local and remote git branches that are candidates for cleanup — merged but not deleted, and inactive branches with no commits in a configurable period (default 3 months). Use when user mentions "stale branches", "old branches", "branch cleanup", "prune branches", "dead branches", "unused branches", "inactive branches", "branch hygiene", or asks to "list branches to delete", "find stale branches", or runs /stale-branches command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website or business type. Orchestrates 52 sub-skills (52 active): full site audits, technical SEO (CWV/INP), schema, E-E-A-T content quality, images, sitemaps, GEO for AI Overviews, llms.txt generation, AI crawler audit, plus live GSC and Ahrefs MCP data. GSC: overview, drops, opportunities, brand-vs-nonbrand, cannibalization, compare, content-decay, index-issues, new-keywords. Ahrefs: overview, backlinks, keywords, competitors, content-gap, broken-links, new-links, anchor-analysis, dr-history, top-pages. Cross-MCP: serp, content-brief, brand-radar, site-audit-pro, report. Local: log-analysis, ai-content-check, internal-links, local, migration-check, obsidian-kb. AI Readability: llms-txt, robots-ai. Performance: lighthouse-audit, core-web-vitals, page-experience. Quality & AI Search: rich-results, ai-optimization, eeat-audit, helpful-content. Triggers on: "SEO", "audit", "schema", "Core Web Vitals", "sitemap", "E-E-A-T", "AI Overviews", "GEO", "technical SEO", "content quality", "structured data", "GSC", "Ahrefs", "backlinks", "keywords", "search console", "domain rating", "local SEO", "migration", "lighthouse", "pagespeed", "LCP", "INP", "CLS", "page experience", "interstitials", "mobile friendly", "rich results", "rich snippets", "schema eligibility", "AI optimization", "AI search readiness", "EEAT", "trust signals", "helpful content", "people-first", "content quality gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate accurate Volcengine SDK examples by locating an API through API Explorer search, fetching its swagger, and calling api/common/explorer/make-code with user-provided Params. Use when the user asks how to write Volcengine SDK code, generate SDK samples, or call a Volcengine API in Python, Go, Java, PHP, cURL, Node.js. Supports Chinese and English API names such as "角色扮演", "AssumeRole", or "STS AssumeRole". Also use for explicit SDK configuration questions about retry, timeout, AK/SK, STS, AssumeRole, temporary credentials, proxy, connection pooling, SSL, debug mode, request signing, response parsing, and error handling. If the user only needs API parameters, enum values, required fields, error codes, response schemas, pagination, or API comparisons, hand off to volcengine-api. If they need CLI-based operations, hand off to volcengine-cli.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Volcengine's AI-native BaaS platform (Supabase edition / AIDAP / 火山引擎 AI 原生 BaaS 平台 Supabase 版) — a Volcengine-operated distribution that differs from official Supabase. Use when the user asks to create, inspect, or manage Volcengine Supabase or AIDAP resources — workspaces, branches, computes, SQL queries, schema changes, Auth, Realtime, Edge Functions, Storage buckets, frontend static-site hosting (Pages), API keys, connection info, or TypeScript type generation — or when a Volcengine deployment selects AIDAP as its database provider. Also trigger on Chinese prompts mentioning "火山引擎 Supabase" or "火山 Supabase". Operations run through the byted-supabase-cli command-line tool (installed via `npm i -g @byted-supabase/cli`; this is NOT the official `supabase` CLI). Do NOT use it for general database discussions, non-Supabase services (RDS MySQL, Redis), or pure client-side coding unrelated to Supabase backend management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a failing GitHub Actions run to green in as few CI runs as possible, with a bounded fix-critique-commit-push-recheck loop that batches every evidenced fix into each push. Use when the user supplies a GitHub Actions run URL or run ID and wants the failure fixed, or asks to "make CI green", "fix the failing workflow/build/tests", "fix the red build", or to keep iterating on a branch or pull request until its checks pass. Pulls run results and failed-job logs through the gh CLI, and sends every fix plan to the rubber-duck reviewer before any code is touched.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。