「pin」の検索結果

You are helping a penetration tester exploit PHP code injection where user input

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit password reset vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit race conditions and TOCTOU

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester deploy webshells to web server document

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit Insecure Direct Object Reference

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit server-side template injection in a

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Business logic vulnerability testing for web/mobile/API engagements. Covers workflow bypass, state machine violations, multi-step process abuse, price/quantity/discount manipulation, currency confusion, coupon stacking, refund/chargeback abuse, race conditions on logic boundaries, parameter tampering for hidden flows, role/tenant boundary violations, time-of-check vs use, anti-automation defeat, fraud-detection evasion, and subscription/quota abuse. Use when scoping an application after surface-level OWASP Top 10 has been covered, or when the asset is a transactional/marketplace/fintech/e-commerce/SaaS app where logic flaws produce direct financial impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt JWT cryptographic failures — alg:none signature-stripping and RS256→HS256 key-confusion that let an attacker forge a token for any identity (e.g. an admin) without knowing a secret. Use when the app authenticates with a JSON Web Token (an `eyJ...` Bearer token in the Authorization header, a cookie, or a login response). This skill OWNS JWT signature/crypto forgery (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku header injection); hunt-ato covers JWT as one ATO path, hunt-auth-bypass covers SSO/SAML token trust, hunt-api-misconfig covers non-crypto JWT handling. Critical when a forged token grants access to another user's data or an admin-only endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Spring Boot specific vulnerabilities — Actuator endpoints (heapdump, env, loggers, mappings, shutdown), Spring Expression Language (SpEL) injection → RCE, H2 console RCE, Jolokia JMX exposure, Spring4Shell (CVE-2022-22965), Spring Cloud Function SPEL (CVE-2022-22963), heap dump credential extraction. Use when target runs Spring Boot — detected via X-Application-Context header, /actuator, Whitelabel Error Page, or Java stack traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover a single-page-app's hidden backend API from its public JS bundle, then test that API for broken access control / missing authentication. One of the highest-yield web plays in modern recon — SPAs ship their entire backend route map to the browser, and the API behind them is frequently missing the auth middleware the login page implies. Built from an authorized engagement where this play found an unauthenticated financial API that an ASM scan reporting hundreds of 'Criticals' completely missed. Use whenever a target serves a JS-heavy SPA (React/Vue/Angular/Next), an 'app'/'console'/'dashboard'/'portal' subdomain, or any `*api*` host shows up in recon. Leaked build artifacts (source maps / .env / .git / asset-manifest) are owned by hunt-source-leak; API version-inventory and behavioral diffing by hunt-shadow-api; this skill owns mapping a live SPA's backend routes from its JS bundle and testing them for broken access control / missing auth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Time-of-Check / Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition exploitation methodology across binary, kernel, filesystem, web, and container layers. Covers symbolic-link races (open/access/stat split), file-descriptor races, fopen/realpath traversal races, /proc and procfs races, FUSE-backed slow-fs races to widen the window, ptrace and signal races, kernel double-fetch / userspace pointer races, container/runc/symlink escape primitives, kubernetes admission/authz TOCTOU, web auth-vs-authz TOCTOU, JWT-claim TOCTOU at gateway vs service, payment/idempotency races, and modern race-amplification techniques (single-packet attack, slow loris, FUSE pause, cgroup freeze, scheduler shaping). Use when you've identified a 'check then act' pattern in code, when fuzzing for race conditions, or when exploiting concurrency bugs in privileged binaries / kernel / orchestrators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt gRPC vulnerabilities — server reflection enabled (enumerate all services/methods), missing authentication / metadata-stripping on internal endpoints, plaintext gRPC over HTTP/2, internal endpoint disclosure, proto file leakage, gRPC-Web/grpc-gateway transcoding injection, and HTTP/2 Rapid Reset DoS (CVE-2023-44487). Use when target exposes port 50051 / 443 / 8443 / 9090 with HTTP/2, when grpcurl/grpcui detects reflection, when an Envoy or grpc-gateway proxy is fronting a microservice, or when recon reveals a microservice architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit sudo misconfigurations, SUID/SGID binaries,

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester bypass User Account Control to escalate from

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit scheduled tasks, services, and inter-process

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester find and extract locally stored credentials on a

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester escalate privileges on a Windows system by

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester enumerate a Windows system for local privilege

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit writable files, filesystem misconfigurations,

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit kernel vulnerabilities, vulnerable drivers,

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Windows privilege escalation methodology for offensive security engagements. Covers the full attack surface from a standard user shell to NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM: token impersonation via SeImpersonate and SeAssignPrimaryToken privileges using JuicyPotato, PrintSpoofer, GodPotato, SweetPotato, and RoguePotato; service misconfigurations including unquoted service paths, weak service DACLs, writable service binaries, and insecure service creation permissions; AlwaysInstallElevated MSI exploitation; DLL hijacking through search order abuse, phantom DLL loading, and writable PATH directory injection; UAC bypass techniques via fodhelper.exe, eventvwr.exe, CMSTP, and environment variable manipulation; scheduled task abuse for writable task actions and new task creation; registry autorun exploitation for persistence and escalation; PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-34527) for remote and local privilege escalation; and credential harvesting from SAM database extraction, DPAPI blob decryption, LSA secret dumping,...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are helping a penetration tester exploit Linux kernel vulnerabilities and escape

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Companion to the generic report-writing skill. Use when working specifically on Bugcrowd submissions where VRT mapping, OOS-clause rebuttals, or per-program target selection matter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。