「evaluate」の検索結果

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, critiquing, or stress-testing an existing strategy document. Evaluates seven dimensions — diagnosis quality, guiding policy strength, action coherence, assumption exposure, falsifiability — with optional 7S, Five Forces, Balanced Scorecard, and Hoshin Kanri lenses. Triggers on: review my strategy, poke holes in this plan, what's weak here, strategy audit, red team this. Does NOT build strategy (use strategy-interview) or brainstorm project ideas (use brainstorm-beagle).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch unresolved review comments from a PR and evaluate with receive-feedback skill

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A C-level strategy advisory board, run as a team of named specialist agents, that takes an executive from a raw strategic question to a defended, board-ready recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user faces a significant business decision or wants strategic analysis — market entry, build-vs-buy, M&A, digital transformation, annual planning, portfolio prioritization, pricing, a big investment, a competitive threat, a turnaround. Trigger on requests like "should we invest in / build / buy / enter…", "develop a strategy for…", "evaluate this opportunity", "make the business case", "stress-test this plan", "run a pre-mortem", or "prepare a board presentation" — in any language, even when the user doesn't say the word "strategy". Also trigger when the user names a board member (Drucker, Porter, Christensen, Graham, Grove, Wack, Taleb, Minto) or asks to convene the board / open a boardroom session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score candidate CVs on a 100-point scale against a Job Description. Use this skill when the user wants to evaluate, score, rank, or screen candidate CVs/resumes against a JD. Also trigger when the user mentions 'review CV', 'screen resume', 'rate candidates', 'shortlist', or any context involving matching resumes to job requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

US Insurance Specialist for life, disability, long-term care, and annuity planning. Conducts needs analysis, compares policy types (term, whole life, universal, variable), explains underwriting classes, recommends benefit amounts and riders, analyzes disability income protection (own occupation vs any occupation), evaluates long-term care costs and hybrid policies, and structures annuities (immediate, deferred, fixed, variable) for retirement income. Use for insurance needs calculations, policy comparisons, or state insurance regulation compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive demo: Generate pseudo-labels from a strong teacher model, build a cheap student function, and evaluate accuracy. Showcases pseudo-labeling and teacher-student distillation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate cyber insurance policies and coverage. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with cyber-insurance-evaluation related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantify cyber risk using FAIR methodology with Monte Carlo simulation, assess control effectiveness against NIST CSF/CIS/ISO 27001 frameworks, evaluate risk appetite alignment, and analyze cyber insurance coverage adequacy. Covers threat landscape mapping, asset valuation, loss event frequency and magnitude estimation, annualized loss expectancy calculation, control gap analysis with ROI ranking, residual risk assessment, and insurance policy gap modeling at 90th/95th/99th percentile loss scenarios. Use when building risk registers, preparing board-level risk dashboards, evaluating security investment priorities, assessing cyber insurance coverage, or auditing any organization's risk quantification maturity per NIST RMF, ISO 27005, or FAIR standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates environmental liability exposure with remediation cost estimation, regulatory compliance requirements, and insurance coverage assessment. Use when analyzing environmental liabilities, estimating cleanup costs, or assessing environmental risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze insurance claims workflow systems for intake optimization, adjudication rules, subrogation, litigation management, and settlement analytics. Use when: 'audit claims process', 'review FNOL workflow', 'evaluate claims automation', 'check subrogation recovery', 'assess claims fraud detection', 'optimize claims cycle time', 'review Guidewire ClaimCenter setup'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates P&C insurance lines with market cycle analysis, loss cost trending, and competitive assessment. Use when analyzing P&C markets, tracking insurance cycles, or evaluating line profitability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates loss reserve adequacy with development triangle analysis and actuarial methods. Use when analyzing reserves, interpreting loss triangles, or assessing reserve adequacy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates life insurance product structures with cash value analysis, cost comparisons, and suitability assessment. Use when analyzing life products, comparing insurance costs, or assessing product suitability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates insurtech business models with distribution innovation, underwriting technology, and claims automation. Use when analyzing insurtech, evaluating digital insurance, or assessing insurance technology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates health insurance plan structures with actuarial value, network analysis, and cost projection. Use when analyzing health plans, comparing coverage, or projecting healthcare costs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates embedded finance opportunities with distribution economics and regulatory framework analysis. Use when analyzing embedded finance, evaluating BaaS models, or assessing embedded lending/insurance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates insurance company investment portfolios with ALM considerations and regulatory constraints. Use when analyzing insurer investments, managing ALM, or evaluating portfolio compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage vendor relationships — vendor selection scorecard, contract review checklist, renewal tracking, and vendor consolidation audit. Use when asked to "evaluate this vendor", "review this contract", "track vendor renewals", or "reduce our SaaS spend".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Theory-backed design audit — names the principle violated, cites the source, shows the fix. Use when asked to "evaluate design quality", "check if this follows design principles", "theory check", "design exam", "audit against best practices", or "what's wrong with this design".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to audit UI for visual quality, check design consistency, review brand alignment, evaluate design system compliance, or find visual issues before a launch. Examples: "audit our UI", "check visual consistency", "review the design for issues", "is our UI on-brand", "find visual bugs", "design QA before launch".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert 5-dimension design critique — philosophical, scored, actionable. Use when asked to "critique this design", "expert review", "score my design", "how does this look", "is this good design", "design feedback", or "review this UI". Different from /form-audit (which is technical QA for consistency/compliance) — form-critique evaluates design as a craft object: philosophy, hierarchy, execution, function, and innovation each scored 0–10 with a punch list. Add "as a report" or "give me a visual report" to produce an HTML file with SVG radar chart, evidence cards, and Keep/Fix/Quick-wins action lists — useful for design reviews and stakeholder presentations instead of CLI output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Usability review — evaluate an existing flow or UI against usability heuristics, flag friction points, and recommend fixes. Use when asked to "review the UX", "usability audit", "what's wrong with this flow", "UX feedback", "critique this design", or "why are users dropping off here".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。