「findings」の検索結果

Guides pull request creation and review, including posting findings, controlling scope, readying work for review, and splitting work into a stacked-PR chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and maintain a persistent, LLM-maintained markdown wiki following Andrej Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern — the agent incrementally compiles raw sources into an interlinked knowledge base instead of re-deriving answers from scratch. Use this whenever the user wants to ingest a source (an article, paper, transcript, chapter, meeting notes), file knowledge or conversation findings into the wiki, query the accumulated knowledge base, lint or health-check the wiki, or mentions "the wiki", "knowledge base", "ingest this", "file this", "what do we know about X", or accumulating notes on a topic over time — even if they don't say "LLM Wiki" explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Onboard a repository to skillsaw — run the linter, triage the findings by rule, apply autofixes, manually fix what remains, set up CI, and create a baseline. Use when adopting skillsaw on a new or existing project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix skillsaw lint violations — apply deterministic autofixes, then resolve the remaining violations with targeted edits guided by `skillsaw explain`. Use when skillsaw reports violations, when asked to clean up lint findings, or after `skillsaw fix` leaves violations behind.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update a repository to the newest skillsaw — upgrade the install, report new rules and their findings in your repo, and bump version pins (GitHub Action SHAs, Makefile targets, pre-commit hooks). Use when a new skillsaw release is out and you want its latest checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches and explores Burp Suite project files (.burp) from the command line. Use when searching response headers or bodies with regex patterns, extracting security audit findings, dumping proxy history or site map data, or analyzing HTTP traffic captured in a Burp project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a specific technology, library, system, protocol, or tool to answer a concrete technical question with source-traceable evidence. Use when current implementation details, version behavior, configuration, compatibility, or authoritative technical facts must be verified rather than recalled. Also use when explicitly asked to incorporate verified findings into an existing skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit skill lifecycle by tracing call chains, detecting circular dependencies, finding instruction contradictions, identifying duplicated datasets, analyzing bidirectional coherence, discovering scriptable sequences, and learning patterns. Use when checking skill coherence, validating skill workflow, finding semantic gaps in plugin structure, or auditing plugin before marketplace submission. Generates audit reports to .plugin-creator/audits/ with findings by dimension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format and score completed plugin assessment findings without starting another assessment workflow. Use when a plugin assessment needs the standard report structure, scoring criteria, severity breakdown, or marketplace-readiness result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and iterate on the SDLC Layer Separation Architecture implementation. Runs validation checks (cross-references, doc completeness, layer metadata, integration points), produces a findings report, and supports iterative fixes. Use when validating first-pass implementation, before claiming layer work is complete, or when improving layer docs/schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when SAM Stage 5 Execution has completed and task results need independent verification against acceptance criteria. Dispatches a separate reviewer agent to fact-check implementation outputs and returns COMPLETE or NEEDS_WORK with specific findings and remediation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides a pre-submission manuscript audit covering argument, numerical consistency, references and DOIs, writing, figures, CONSORT flow, pre-registration, and the replication archive. Use before paper submission or when a draft needs an adversarial, quote-grounded review with a journal-readiness checklist. Add `--codex` to run the specification independently on Claude and Codex, GPT-6 Astra, and cross-check findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews an existing conjoint study for threats to inference and returns severity-ranked findings on design, estimation, measurement error, external validity, and interpretation. Use when checking whether a conjoint design or analysis holds up, or answering referee comments on one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a whole deliverable against its manifest without rewriting it — deterministic gate, per-section finders, a whole-work pass, and adjudicated findings.json and report.md with honest coverage. Use before shipping a deliverable or for the night shift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews an existing conjoint study for threats to inference and returns severity-ranked findings on design integrity, estimation, measurement error, external validity, and interpretation, including the guardrail against reading an AMCE as majority preference. Use when the user asks whether a conjoint design or analysis holds up, has referee comments on a conjoint, or wants a second opinion on estimation or interpretation. New designs go to conjoint-design, reshaping to conjoint-cleaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a pre-submission manuscript audit covering argument, numerics, references, writing, figures, methods, preregistration, and replication readiness. Add --codex for a cross-model pass in which Codex and Claude review independently and verify each other's findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate one Anabasis v2 campaign from its log and turn what it shows into findings with one owner each. Answers whether a comparison's reading (step, no-step, not-scored) may be believed, whether a fail was the solver's or the exam's, whether the harness could know the exam, whether the tasks bracket the solver, whether the campaign is climbing, and where the hours and dollars went. Reads evidence; starts no solve, session or round, and changes no verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create .agent/baseline.md and later compare against it. Use when capturing baseline build/lint/test results or investigating newly introduced findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks to save, remember, recall, or organize memories. Triggers on: 'remember this', 'save this', 'note this', 'what did we discuss about...', 'check your notes', 'clean up memories'. Also use proactively when discovering valuable findings worth preserving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Incan review/fix loop end to end: review, fix actionable findings, and review again until clean or blocked. Use when the user wants an autonomous review-and-repair pass or says /review-and-fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit AuthCrunch security boundaries, triage vulnerability reports and scanner findings, reproduce authentication or authorization failures, and prepare evidence-backed remediation. Covers trust, credentials, redirects, concurrency, diagnostic logging, and dependency exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a holistic, human-reviewer-style critique of the currently staged Git changes (or, with `--working-copy`, of all uncommitted changes, with `--branch`, of a branch against its base, or, with `--commit`, of a single commit) and emit an approve/reject verdict with prioritized, severity-tagged, line-cited findings. Use when the user wants the staged diff, a branch, or a commit "reviewed", "critiqued", or "code-reviewed".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic init the first time Claude acts in an incident or alerts channel — one named like #inc-…, #incident-…, #sev0-…/#sev1-…, or whose recent messages are pages or alerts from PagerDuty, Opsgenie, incident.io, Datadog, Sentry or Grafana, or relayed by people (talk about being paged is not an alert) — that isn't already a team's oncall / monitoring channel. Run once per channel, on first contact (just invited, first @-mention, channel just created), before doing what was asked: load the oncall memory oncall setup wrote to shared workspace memory, pick the owning team's section, work out which monitoring / paging / code tools Claude can reach and which are missing, post one short zero-context message, note findings in this channel's memory, then hand off to `incident-investigate` if something was asked — or immediately, unasked, when the channel was plainly opened for a live outage. Works with no oncall memory (offers setup once). Also on "load the oncall setup here" / "init this incident".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。