「reviewer」の検索結果

Document a machine learning model in a structured, transparent format for stakeholders, reviewers, and future maintainers. Use when the user says "document this model", "write a model card", "model documentation", "how should I document my ML model", "bias and fairness report", "model transparency", "what does this model do", "model handoff", "production model documentation", or needs to communicate what a model does, how it was built, where it works, and where it fails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to audit CLI adapter projects (like opencli) for missing output fields, then batch-generate fixes and submit PRs. Turns AI agents into adapter quality reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

High Availability control plane for Yuzu — the canonical entry point for any work on ADR-2002 (active-active server tier, gateway-fronted routing, Postgres-backed coordination seam, HA Postgres storage). Use when the user says "/ha", "/high-availability", "/ha-matrix", asks to plan or implement an HA workstream (WS-0…WS-14), asks "what's our HA gap" or "is it safe to run a second replica yet", asks to audit HA readiness, or starts work touching the coordination seam (leader election / fenced epochs / transactional outbox), gateway intra-cluster routing, shared `AgentRegistry` presence, PKI/CA HA, or the `deploy/docker/*ha*` / `scripts/ha/` surface. The skill bundles the two-axis model, the safe-to-scale gate, the delivery matrix (current-state + reviewers + status), the per-workstream workflow, and the load order for the routed reference docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects placeholder content, stub UI, hardcoded test credentials, and non-production endpoints that signal an incomplete app to reviewers under Guideline 2.1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects review-blocking configuration issues including sub-1.0 version numbers, beta in app name, staging endpoints, and missing demo credentials that prevent reviewers from evaluating the app, violating Guidelines 2.1 and 2.3.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects hardcoded iPhone-sized widths, missing iPad orientation keys, and absent size-class adaptation that cause layout failures on iPad reviewers' devices under guidelines 2.1 and 2.4.1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects missing iPad orientation keys, portrait-only orientation locks, and forced-rotation patterns that cause layout failures when an iPad reviewer rotates their device, violating guideline 2.4.1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform thorough code reviews with actionable, prioritized feedback. Use when a user asks to review code, check code quality, find bugs, review a pull request, audit code for issues, or get feedback on implementation. Covers correctness, security, performance, readability, and best practices across languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a researched long-form article from a topic prompt via an orchestrated pipeline - research agent (first-person sources, working-definition gate), narrative-architecture outline, writer/cold-reviewer loop with an explicit ACCEPT/REVISE verdict contract, then a catalog-deslop pass with a regression gate. The orchestrator dispatches subagents only; the writer never judges its own draft. Use when the user says "article factory", "write an article about X", "run the article pipeline", or asks for a researched long-form piece produced end-to-end. For essays and micro posts in the user's own voice without a research stage, use the prose skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert code reviewer focusing on quality, maintainability, performance, and best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performance review. Detects project type and dispatches compute and/or web performance reviewers. Advisory only — no changes made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, reviewing, or architecting Rust code — systems programming, async services, CLI tooling, web backends, or any work in `.rs` files. Triggers on editing `.rs` or `Cargo.toml` files, or mentions of "Rust", "Tokio", "Axum", "cargo", "borrow checker", "lifetime", "trait object", "async Rust", "crate", "rustc", or explicit requests to "build this in Rust" / "rewrite X in Rust". For adversarial security review of Rust code see security-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine for hypothesis testing, literature gap analysis, experimental validation, and data-driven discovery. Enforces adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search over hypotheses, confounder harness for quantitative claims, and serendipity detection. TRIGGER when: user asks to analyze scientific data, test hypotheses, validate findings, search for research gaps, design experiments, or investigate results. DO NOT TRIGGER when: pure code review, documentation writing, devops tasks, general conversation, or non-scientific data transformation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine v6.0 NEXUS — adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search, serendipity tracking, confounder harness, cross-session learning. Use for ANY scientific analysis, hypothesis testing, data validation, literature review, or task where correctness > speed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review ads and campaign setup for policy compliance on Meta (Facebook/Instagram), Google Ads, TikTok Ads, YouTube Ads, Amazon Ads, and DSP/programmatic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill 生命周期治理 / 能力沉淀判断：当用户要新建、导入、合并、发布、更新、弃用、退役或删除一个 可复用 Skill，或要决定它应进入统一公开仓、项目、本地 Agent 或 Multica 时使用。 可用中文唤起：“帮我创建一个 Skill”“把这个流程固化成 Skill”“导入这个 GitHub Skill” “这个 Skill 应该放哪里”“把 Skill 发布到多个 Agent”。只评审现有 SKILL.md 时改用 skill-reviewer。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill 评审 / Skill 审计：当用户要检查、评审、优化 Codex/Agent Skill 或 SKILL.md 时使用。 可用中文唤起：“帮我 review 这个 Skill”“检查这个 SKILL.md”“这个能力适不适合做成 Skill” “优化 Skill 触发描述”“看下这个 Skill 有没有问题”。重点检查触发边界、输入输出、工作流门槛、 工具边界、context budget、资源拆分、评估准备度和治理风险。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated Git PR review — diff analysis + quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review all unreviewed documents in Hubdoc. Use when reviewing, processing or publishing Hubdoc receipts and bills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and address all unresolved GitHub PR review comments on the current branch's pull request. Use when the user asks to resolve, address, respond to, or reply to PR review feedback — whether from humans, CodeRabbit, Copilot, Claude Code reviewer, or any other source. Triggers on "/rr", "resolve review comments", "address PR feedback", "reply to review threads", "deal with CodeRabbit", etc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic AI development workflow orchestrator. Manages task boards (.jonggrang/jonggrang-tasks.json), runs 16-phase pipelines (BUGFIX/SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE), installs lifecycle hooks for Claude Code and OpenCode, and coordinates five specialist roles (Lead/Developer/Reviewer/TestLead/Tester). Use when planning features, executing multi-step development workflows, or orchestrating AI coding agents. Run via npx jonggrang.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Used by the Reviewer agent during Phase 9 (DesignVerify) and Phase 11 (Quality) to evaluate frontend code. Assesses visual hierarchy, spacing consistency, accessibility, and detects formulaic 'AI slop' design patterns, providing actionable feedback to the Developer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。