2,983 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Implement or extend a CPU architecture, processor variant, instruction set, addressing modes, registers, interrupts, bus transactions, disassembly, timing, and processor tests in EMULATORS. Use when adding a processor not yet emulated, deriving a CPU from F6500, FZ80, or another family, filling missing opcodes, correcting instruction semantics or cycles, or creating exhaustive instruction and interrupt tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement unit, conformance, integration, timing, boot, trace, video, audio, and regression tests for EMULATORS processors, chips, peripherals, and complete machines. Use when creating a verification strategy for a new emulator, converting hardware documentation into tests, adding diagnostic programs or golden artifacts, measuring behavioral coverage, or proving that components interact correctly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and run EMULATORS locally on Windows with the repository-compatible Visual Studio configuration and SDL runtime architecture. Use whenever Codex compiles, links, tests, launches, or smoke-tests an EMULATORS executable on Windows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TDD methodology for production-quality tests. Write tests FIRST driven by PRD, Tech Spec, Implementation Plan. Covers minimal mocking, realistic test data, strong assertions, test independence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to generate API tests, create integration test suites, test REST endpoints, or build contract tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check upgrade safety for a Tamanu upgrade that spans many versions: verify that every intermediate hotfix is included in the target version, and surface the new configuration/settings, data migrations, and FHIR rematerialisation impact the upgrade brings. Use when the user wants to check an upgrade from one Tamanu version to another (e.g. "check hotfixes from v2.31 to v2.47"), confirm no intermediate hotfix was dropped, or understand what config, migrations, and FHIR rework a multi-version jump requires. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for cutting a release (see release-cutoff-checks) or deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Tamanu pre-release verification checks: verify that hotfixes on the current release branch are merged forward to main, and that hotfixes from prior release branches are included in the current release. Use when the user wants to run "pre-release checks", verify hotfix integrity before cutting or shipping a Tamanu release, confirm a release/X.YY branch is safe to release, or check that no hotfix has been orphaned (left on neither main nor the current release). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Tamanu release-branch CUTOFF checks when preparing to cut a new release/X.YY branch: confirm the previous release's hotfixes are merged to main, reconcile the commits since the previous release against the "Merged to main" card list from Linear, and scan for data/reporting/schema changes. Use when the user is cutting a Tamanu release and wants to verify the codebase is ready, wants to check main against the previous release branch, or wants to reconcile commits with a Linear "Merged to main" column (they should paste the card list). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for verifying an existing release branch's hotfix integrity (see pre-release-checks) or for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test-driven development with red-green-refactor and behavior-focused tests. Use when the user explicitly wants test-first work, a regression test before a fix, or integration tests that drive a feature through a public interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
本番と同じ失敗を本番前に検出するためのテスト階層設計スキル。 DB方言差、実依存関係、永続化確認、timezone差、packaging整合性、 adversarial regressionをunit/integration/e2e/smoke/packagingに 適切に割り振り、PR CIで最低限の本番同等性を保証する。 Use when designing production-parity tests, closing test blind spots, building smoke suites for real dependencies, verifying persistence beyond UI success, or creating adversarial regression backlogs.
Turn a new or changed ADR into implemented behavior, routing docs, tests, and guardrails rather than leaving it as standalone prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review changes for bugs, regressions, missing tests, safety gaps, public/private leaks, and architecture drift before stylistic comments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove signs of AI-generated code from a codebase while preserving behavior. Use when editing or reviewing code to make it read like a human engineer on this team wrote it. Works through a test-guarded detect-modify-verify loop: pin down the functional contract and edge cases first, write or run tests as a safety net, then rewrite AI tells (redundant comments, emoji, verbose names, reflexive try/except, defensive null-guards, over-decomposition, speculative abstraction, dead code, non-idiomatic constructs, hallucinated dependencies) and re-verify after every change. The tests decide whether a defensive block is slop or a real safeguard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates downstream tests for coverage and edge cases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ensure tests use clear naming and cover edge cases with proper describe/it structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects patterns that make tests flaky and proposes stabilization steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check whether changed code paths have corresponding tests and suggest minimal coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find missing tests for critical paths, edge cases, and failure handling in changed code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive Domain-Driven Design modeling sessions based on DDD Distilled (Vaughn Vernon) and Domain Modeling Made Functional (Scott Wlaschin). Guides users through strategic and tactical design via 13 phases: discover, storming, contexts, mapping, aggregates, events, validate, glossary, workflows, types, simulate, publish, sync. Phase 13 (sync) reconciles divergences found by --analyze between the domain model and the implementation — judging whether the model or the code is authoritative, then planning and implementing the fix and re-aligning the model. Phases 9-11 take the conceptual model from phases 1-8 and produce workflow pipeline designs, compilable type definitions (TypeScript, Kotlin, Scala, Rust, C#, F#), workflow verification via type-level tests, and automatic UI field enumeration from the domain model. Phase 12 (publish) renders all docs/domain artifacts into one self-contained, cross-linked HTML site (separate files joined by a shared nav). Each phase is an interactive dialogue where AI acts as facilitator and domain expert challenger. Use when: "DDD", "ドメイン設計", "ドメインモデリング", "Event Storming", "Bounded Context", "集約設計", "ユビキタス言語", "コンテキストマップ", "ワークフロー設計", "パイプライン設計", "ステップ分割", "中間型", "型駆動フロー", "型駆動設計", "Domain Modeling Made Functional", "Railway Oriented Programming", "入力画面項目", "フォーム項目洗い出し", "UI 項目抽出", "HTMLにまとめる", "ドキュメントサイト化", "成果物を1つのHTMLに", "publish", "モデルと実装の差異", "差異解消", "実装との乖離", "モデルとコードを一致", "差異の実装計画", "sync", "複数フェーズを逐次実行", "フェーズをまとめて実行", "/ddd run", "サブコマンド一覧", "/ddd list", "/ddd", "ドメイン分析したい", "モデリングしたい", or any domain design / type modeling activity.
Design a test strategy around product risk, business invariants, failure modes, and existing controls, deciding what deserves testing and at which boundary rather than maximising coverage. Use whenever the user asks how to test something, wants a test plan or strategy, is deciding between unit/integration/contract/E2E/property/concurrency testing, or wants to know whether existing tests actually protect what matters. Prefer this over writing tests immediately. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving risk coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate any tdmcp test-coverage work: run the coverage harness, inspect coverage gaps, plan focused Vitest/msw or bridge tests, delegate coverage writers, verify coverage deltas, and re-run gates. Use whenever the user asks to raise coverage, add broad regression coverage, create a test harness, improve tests, re-run a coverage wave, or fix a coverage gate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test smart contracts comprehensively using Hardhat and Foundry with unit tests, integration tests, and mainnet forking. Use when testing Solidity contracts, setting up blockchain test suites, or validating DeFi protocols.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Playwright tests at scale using Azure Playwright Workspaces (formerly Microsoft Playwright Testing). Use when scaling browser tests across cloud-hosted browsers, integrating with CI/CD pipeline...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。