「repo」の検索結果

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan and redact PII and sensitive data (emails, phone numbers, SSNs, API keys, IP addresses, credentials, amounts, company/person names) from repository files. Includes a pre-commit hook to block commits containing PII. Use when asked to audit code for sensitive data, sanitize files before publishing, or install PII detection hooks. For application security hardening see security-engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain SESSION-STATE.md, the durable within-session memory that survives context compaction. Use when a constraint, settled decision, existing-infrastructure (survey) finding, or open thread must persist across a long session so it is not re-derived or re-litigated. Triggers on /state, "remember this for the session", "record this constraint/decision", or after surveying what already exists. For cross-session/personal memory use .claude/memory/ on Claude or native memories on Codex; for repo-derivable facts, do not record at all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when forensically auditing a Claude Code skill/agent/command/workflow library against RULESET.md by a fixed mechanical protocol — probing every file against the mechanically-checkable rules and reporting CONFORMS / VIOLATES / UNVERIFIABLE / N-A counts with quoted evidence. It casts NO judgment and emits NO pass/fail verdict; counts are the headline. Triggers on "investigate the library", "audit against RULESET", "find every violation", "forensic library audit", "evidence-only check". Not for routing/quality/single-responsibility judgment — use skill-library-review. Not the full sharded sweep — use the audit-library command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when committing or pushing changes and the repository needs a version bump. Analyzes commits using conventional commit prefixes to determine whether the next release is a major, minor, or patch increment. Also use when the user asks about versioning, release planning, or changelog generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code that may invalidate existing docs. Detects stale documentation by matching the code diff against in-repo doc files and applies targeted updates. Relevant when code changes rename, remove, or add APIs, fields, config keys, or CLI flags. Also applies when the user says "update docs", "check docs", or "are the docs stale", or when reviewing a branch for documentation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing or writing any committable deliverable (phase closeout, status report, skill file, wave spec, README section, summary document, CHANGELOG entry, or any markdown file declaring completion or pass/fail status). Applies before the write happens, not after. Without this discipline, agents ship 60% deliverables and declare closure prematurely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This is the MistEye security gate skill. It is triggered by pre-installation risk checks (including Skill/MCP dependency manifests), pre-access security checks for domains or URLs, IoC malicious detection, and supply-chain risk blocking, especially for common requests such as "take a look at this address/website." It must use `https://app-api.misteye.io/functions/v1/detect`; in dependency and external-link scenarios it has the highest priority. If the API returns `status="malicious"` or any `matches`, the action must be blocked and explicitly reported as "blocked". Only after the first installation is complete should the user be reminded that daily patrols can be enabled with OpenClaw or Hermes (default once per day).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code auditor that grades software projects and the agents/developers who built them. Produces structured JSON + Markdown reports with a standardized rubric. Evaluates architecture, correctness, testing, authorship cohesiveness, ghost code, and more. Optionally ingests tmux session logs for process evidence and interrogates agents about specific problems found. Use when asked to "audit", "grade", "evaluate", "review code quality", "rate this project", "score the agents", or "assess the codebase". Especially useful after Marcus multi-agent experiments to grade agent output and track quality over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses the local pruner indexer to gather relevant code context before making changes, debugging, refactoring, or answering questions about this repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts structured data from large sets of legal documents into tabular format for review, analysis, and reporting. Processes contracts, agreements, correspondence, filings, and other legal documents in bulk — extracting key terms, dates, parties, obligations, risks, and custom fields into organized tables. Use when conducting due diligence document review, bulk contract extraction, compliance audits across document sets, lease portfolio analysis, employment agreement review, regulatory filing review, or any task requiring structured extraction from multiple documents. Trigger keywords: tabular review, bulk extraction, document review table, data room review, batch document analysis, contract extraction, portfolio review, structured extraction, document comparison table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

类案检索报告生成 Skill — 面向律师、法官助理及法务人员的类案检索全流程自动化工具。基于待决案件信息，通过调用得理案例检索 API 完成案件拆解、检索执行、类案筛选、比对分析与规则提炼，最终输出一份可直接向法院提交或供内部策略研判使用的标准化《类案检索报告》。当用户提出以下需求时触发：帮我生成XX案由的类似案例报告、检索XX报告、做一个类案检索报告、我要向法院提交类案检索报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces internal case viability and conflict check memos for personal injury litigation intake. Screens conflicts, assesses liability and damages, checks statute of limitations, and outputs an accept/decline recommendation. Use when evaluating new PI intake, running conflict checks, assessing case merit pre-filing, or preparing acceptance memos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces neutral, section-pinned U.S. legislative bill summaries translating statutory language into plain terms with identifying data, provisions, fiscal impacts, and controversy. Use when summarizing bills, analyzing proposed legislation, preparing bill briefs, digesting committee reports or fiscal notes, or writing legislative updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a structured, objective summary of corporate board meetings covering metadata, quorum, attendance, conflicts, resolutions with vote counts, committee reports, and significant corporate actions. Use when summarizing board minutes, creating a corporate governance record, or preparing a post-meeting recap for officers, shareholders, or regulators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts board committee charters for Audit and Compensation Committees tailored to public/private status, exchange listing (NYSE/NASDAQ), and governance requirements. Covers composition, independence, authority, meeting procedures, and reporting. Use when creating or updating audit committee charters, compensation committee charters, or corporate oversight committee formations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts U.S. corporate board-of-directors meeting minutes into formal, defensible records documenting valid corporate action and governance process. Triggers on board minutes, directors meeting record, board resolutions, quorum validation, motion and vote capture, corporate secretary records, governance drafting. Requires source materials such as agenda, attendance, bylaws, notices, reports, prior minutes, and resolutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarizes cybersecurity breach incidents into structured legal and compliance records. Trigger when synthesizing incident reports, forensics, logs, or notifications into a defensible chronology, scope-impact analysis, response ledger, or regulatory-risk assessment. Keywords: data breach, incident response, unauthorized access, ransomware, exfiltration, GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarizes raw background check data into structured executive reports with risk categorization (GREEN/YELLOW/RED). Use when processing criminal records, court filings, employment/education verification, sanctions screening, or adverse media for pre-employment screening, executive due diligence, or investment-grade investigations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts board-adopted charters establishing Audit and Compensation Committees for U.S. corporations, covering composition, independence, delegated powers, meeting protocol, reporting, and annual review. Adapts for public (SEC/SOX/exchange) or private governance regimes. Use when creating or refreshing committee charters, preparing for IPO governance readiness, onboarding directors, or conducting governance cleanup. Trigger keywords: audit committee charter, compensation committee charter, board governance, SOX compliance, Rule 10A-3, exchange-standard committees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces an enforcement-aware Animal Welfare Act compliance audit for USDA/APHIS-regulated facilities. Maps Form 7002 inspection citations to verified 9 C.F.R. Parts 1-3 requirements, analyzes NCI severity and recurrence patterns, evaluates core compliance programs (PVC, IACUC, housing, records, transport), and outputs a prioritized corrective action plan with proof artifacts. Use when auditing AWA compliance, reviewing USDA inspection reports, preparing for license renewal, conducting diligence, or assessing enforcement risk. Trigger: Animal Welfare Act, AWA, USDA, APHIS, Form 7002, IACUC, PVC, exhibitor, dealer, research facility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts board-ready Anti-Money Laundering compliance programs for U.S. financial institutions under BSA/FinCEN requirements. Covers CIP, CDD, EDD, SAR/CTR reporting, OFAC screening, risk assessment, training, independent testing, and governance structures. Use when creating or updating AML policies, BSA compliance programs, or financial institution regulatory documentation. Trigger keywords: AML, BSA, FinCEN, Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering, SAR, CTR, OFAC, CIP, CDD, KYC, compliance program.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts privilege-protective, board-ready executive summary memoranda of internal antitrust investigation findings for US federal law. Covers monopolization, vertical restraints, acquisitions, FTC Act Section 5, tech-platform conduct, risk assessment, and remediation. Use when drafting antitrust investigation summaries, board memos on competition risk, or internal compliance investigation reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

将法律文本（合同、法规、规章或司法意见）的诠释性歧义审查转化为精美的交付物。可生成多页面网站（默认）、单页面交互式网站、Microsoft Word 文档、PowerPoint 演示文稿或 LaTeX/PDF。当用户持有压力测试结果、歧义审查或"这将在何处被诉"场景分析，并希望发布、演示或分享时使用。触发词包括"发布审查报告"、"据此制作报告"、"将其转化为网站/演示文稿/简报/Word 文档"、"制作 Netlify 网站"、"制作这些歧义点的幻灯片"、"渲染场景"、"打包这份压力测试"、"生成 LaTeX 版本"等。与歧义压力测试技能（底层分析）配套使用，但也适用于任何结构化或半结构化的歧义分析。视觉设计有明确风格倾向，但用户可覆盖颜色、字体和品牌标识。大多数格式需要 Python 和可写的文件系统；单文件 HTML 在主机两者皆无时仍可运行。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。