本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

aml-compliance-program

Drafts board-ready Anti-Money Laundering compliance programs for U.S. financial institutions under BSA/FinCEN requirements. Covers CIP, CDD, EDD, SAR/CTR reporting, OFAC screening, risk assessment, training, independent testing, and governance structures. Use when creating or updating AML policies, BSA compliance programs, or financial institution regulatory documentation. Trigger keywords: AML, BSA, FinCEN, Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering, SAR, CTR, OFAC, CIP, CDD, KYC, compliance program.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md10.2 KB
  • LICENSE.txt10.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

AML Compliance Program

Produces a comprehensive, board-ready AML compliance program tailored to a financial institution's risk profile, satisfying BSA, FinCEN, and federal/state requirements.

Checkpoint A: Pre-Draft Intake (Mandatory)

Before drafting, collect from the user:

  1. Existing policies — current AML program, risk assessments, exam reports, regulatory correspondence
  2. Institutional profile — org chart, business lines, products, customer demographics, geographic footprint
  3. Risk data — prior assessments, audit findings, enforcement actions, consent orders
  4. Applicable regulations — confirm institution type (bank, MSB, broker-dealer) to determine which CFR parts, FinCEN guidance, and agency bulletins apply

Do not proceed until items 1–2 are addressed. Items 3–4 may be developed during drafting if unavailable.

Quick Start

Draft a numbered policy document covering all sections below. Calibrate depth to the institution's size, complexity, and risk profile.


Step 1: Program Foundation

ElementRequirement
Board endorsementExplicit board/senior management approval and oversight
ScopeAll business lines, customer relationships, geographies, transaction types
Risk-based approachControls calibrated to risk assessment findings
Resource commitmentAdequate personnel, technology, budget

Step 2: AML Compliance Officer

ElementRequirement
QualificationsCAMS or equivalent; demonstrated BSA/AML expertise
Reporting lineDirect to senior management; regular board access
IndependenceEvaluation tied to compliance effectiveness, not production
AuthorityUnrestricted access to all records, systems, personnel

Core duties: Regulatory contact (FinCEN, regulators, law enforcement) · SAR/CTR/BSA filing oversight · risk assessment coordination · training management · independent testing oversight · program design and updates.

Step 3: Customer Identification Program (CIP)

Per 31 CFR § 1020.220:

Data PointIndividualLegal Entity
Full legal nameRequiredRequired
Date of birthRequiredN/A
AddressResidential/business streetPrincipal place of business
ID numberSSN/TIN or passport + countryEIN or equivalent

Verification: Documentary (government ID / incorporation docs) · Non-documentary (consumer reporting, public databases) · Non-face-to-face (additional measures for remote channels).

Retention: 5 years after account closure.

Step 4: Customer Due Diligence (CDD)

Per 31 CFR § 1010.230:

  • Identify beneficial owners: each individual ≥25% equity + one with significant management control
  • Collect via certification form; verify per CIP standards
  • Update ownership on risk-based schedule and upon known changes
  • Document relationship purpose, business activities, anticipated activity, source of funds
  • Build expected transaction profiles (type, industry, geography, history)
  • Ongoing monitoring: automated systems, periodic reviews, exception reporting

Step 5: Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD)

Mandatory EDD triggers:

CategoryExamples
PEPsPer FinCEN guidance
High-risk geographiesFATF high-risk/monitored jurisdictions
Complex ownershipOpaque structures obscuring beneficial ownership
High-risk businessesMSBs, virtual currency exchanges, cash-intensive
Elevated risk ratingMultiple risk factors per internal methodology

Requirements: Background investigation · senior management approval · enhanced monitoring (lower thresholds, more frequent reviews) · documented risk rating methodology (customer × geography × product × activity).

Step 6: Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR)

Per 31 CFR § 1020.320:

  • Threshold: ≥ $5,000 where institution knows/suspects illegal activity, BSA evasion, no business purpose, or criminal facilitation
  • Deadlines: 30 days (suspect identified) · 60 days (no suspect identified)
  • Key indicators: Structuring · activity inconsistent with profile · large currency transactions · wire transfers lacking rationale or involving high-risk jurisdictions · recordkeeping/CIP avoidance · shell company transactions
  • Confidentiality: Federal law prohibits disclosure to subjects; civil/criminal penalties for violation; records retained 5 years; need-to-know access only
  • Escalation: Immediate report to Compliance Officer; good-faith reporters protected

Step 7: Currency Transaction Reporting (CTR)

Per 31 CFR §§ 1010.310, 1020.310:

ElementRequirement
ThresholdCurrency transactions > $10,000 per person per business day
AggregationMultiple transactions by/on behalf of same person in one day
Filing deadline15 calendar days via BSA E-Filing
CurrencyCoin and paper money only (excludes cashier's checks, money orders)

Exemptions (31 CFR § 1020.315): Banks, government entities, listed public companies, qualifying businesses. Require documentation, approval, biennial renewal, annual review.

Step 8: OFAC Compliance

TriggerTiming
Account openingBefore relationship established
Existing customersMinimum annually; risk-based frequency
Transactions (wires, ACH)Real-time or near real-time

Lists: SDN, Consolidated Sanctions, country-based programs.

Actions:

  • Blocking — mandatory for sanctioned persons' property; interest-bearing account; report to OFAC within 10 business days
  • Rejection — prohibited transactions not requiring blocking; notify originator; document decision

Retention: All screening records ≥ 5 years.

Step 9: Risk Assessment

DimensionFactors
Products/servicesVelocity, geographic reach, anonymity, abuse susceptibility
CustomersType, occupation, geography, relationship characteristics
EntitiesOwnership structure, business purpose, formation jurisdiction
GeographyPhysical presence, customer concentrations, FATF/State Dept. flags

Assess inherent (pre-controls) and residual (post-controls) risk. Conduct annually minimum or upon significant changes. Findings drive CDD intensity, monitoring sensitivity, and resource allocation.

Step 10: Training

AudienceTiming
All employees/officers/directorsAnnual minimum
New hiresWithin 30 days or before customer-facing duties
High-risk positionsRole-specific schedule with specialized content

Core curriculum: Institution AML policies · BSA/PATRIOT Act/FinCEN/OFAC · ML/TF typologies · red flags · CIP/CDD procedures · reporting obligations.

Documentation: Attendance records, completion certificates, comprehension assessments.

Step 11: Independent Testing

ElementStandard
IndependencePersonnel independent of AML function
Frequency12–18 months; higher-risk more frequent
ReportingFindings to Compliance Officer, management, board

Scope: Regulatory compliance · policy adequacy · risk assessment methodology · transaction monitoring effectiveness · training adequacy · SAR/CTR timeliness · CIP/CDD compliance · OFAC procedures.

Remediation: Management response required; action plans with timelines; follow-up verification.

Step 12: Governance

Board duties: Approve program and updates · review risk assessment · receive quarterly compliance reports · review testing results · allocate resources.

Quarterly metrics: SAR/CTR activity, OFAC screening, CDD/EDD activities, training completion, testing findings, regulatory developments.

Change management: Document rationale → compliance + legal review → management/board approval → communicate to personnel → maintain version history.

Step 13: Recordkeeping

Record TypeRetention
SARs + supporting docs5 years from filing
CTRs + supporting docs5 years from filing
CIP/CDD/beneficial ownership5 years after account closure
OFAC screening/blocking5 years minimum
Risk assessments, testing, training5 years minimum

Organized for prompt retrieval upon regulatory request. Security controls and audit trails for SAR-related records.


Checkpoint B: Post-Draft Review (Mandatory)

After delivering the draft, ask the user:

  1. Does the program scope match your institution's business lines and risk profile?
  2. Are the CIP/CDD/EDD thresholds appropriate for your customer base?
  3. Do the governance and reporting structures align with your board/committee framework?
  4. Any enforcement history, consent orders, or MRAs that require specific program provisions?

Quality Checks

  • All 13 sections addressed with institution-specific detail
  • CFR citations verified — uncertain citations marked [VERIFY]
  • Risk-based approach: controls scaled to institution size and complexity
  • SAR confidentiality protections embedded in relevant sections
  • OFAC strict-liability posture reflected throughout
  • Retention periods consistent across sections
  • Disclaimer included: framework requires qualified legal counsel review and institution-specific tailoring

Guidelines

  • Mark uncertain CFR citations with [VERIFY] — regulations change; confirm at drafting date
  • OFAC obligations are strict liability — err on the side of caution in all screening procedures
  • SAR confidentiality violations carry serious penalties — embed protections in every relevant procedure and training module
  • Program must be reviewed regularly for regulatory changes, emerging risks, and implementation lessons
  • Consult legal counsel for interpretation questions

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

中国大陆地区法院类案快速检索与《案件检索报告》(DOCX)生成技能。以案件五项要点(案由/法律关系、争议焦点、关键事实、我方诉请与诉讼地位、请求权基础法条)为检索锚点,经一次四问确认即开工(其中**检索地域范围**与**裁判时间范围**为强制选择题,默认范围为「2021年1月1日以后裁判的浙江省范围内的法院案例」,用户点选默认后须回显该范围提示);按**请求权基础、法律关系、案件事实三要素**判定高匹配——用户**指定**检索特定结果的案例时结果相似度计入评分(四要素满分 10 分),用户**未指定**时结果相似度不作为高匹配考虑因素(三要素满分 8 分);r1 判定须**核对法条版本与时间效力**,援引已失效旧法条者不得给满分;以语义向量检索为主召回、精确结构检索为条件兜底,本地脚本加权打分后按「得分率 > 法院层级 > 审判程序 > 裁判日期」排序,并检测**同院同日同标题的重复入库**案件、疑似重复者不占入报名额;截取匹配度最高的 5–10 例类案,逐案调详情核验案号并摘录判词原文,最后直接输出含页脚页码的 DOCX 报告(默认保存至桌面)。全流程人工确认 1 次、检索类调用控制在 2 次召回 + ≤10 次详情以内,报告阶段检索冻结。未指定结果时三要素高匹配而结果相反者亦会入报(逐例标注结果方向),指定结果时结果相反者一律剔除;报告内以两处固定声明披露「未设不利先例定向检索路径」的局限。当用户要求「快速检索类似案例」「找几个正向案例」「快速版案例检索报告」「检索 5 到 10 个类案并出报告」「出一份类案检索报告 docx」时使用。需要四象限归位、反向案例定向检索、补充召回多轮迭代或 14 分制硬软条件精判时,应使用完整版技能「案例检索报告Plus」而非本技能。基于华宇元典法律数据 MCP。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

88查企业风险查询与分析工具 —— 专注于中国大陆企业的法务风险查询与分析,覆盖经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法案件等风险类型。支持公司名称、统一社会信用代码、companyId 三种输入方式,自动完成风险查询并输出结构化风险分析总结。 触发场景:仅当用户意图为查询企业风险/法务风险时触发。包括但不限于:企业风险查询、公司风险、经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法风险、风险扫描、风险评估、企业合规审查、风险报告、XX公司有什么风险、XX公司安全吗、XX公司有没有处罚、XX公司被执行过吗。 不触发场景:纯粹的企业信息查询(如查公司、搜企业、工商信息、注册资本、法人代表、股东结构、专利商标等)不应触发本技能,请使用其他 cha88 系列工具。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification submissions demonstrating substantial equivalence under 21 CFR Part 807. Supports Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated pathways. Use when preparing Class II medical device regulatory filings, substantial equivalence analyses, or FDA premarket submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

CSlawyer1985 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する