本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

abstract-of-judgment

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB
  • LICENSE.txt10.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Abstract of Judgment

Produces a recordable Abstract of Judgment that perfects a judgment lien against the debtor's real property.

Prerequisites

  1. Judgment order — final judgment with entry date, relief granted, and any amendments
  2. Case filing documents — complaint, caption, case number
  3. Party information — full legal names, addresses, aliases/DBAs for all creditors and debtors
  4. Fee/cost documentation — attorney fee orders, cost memoranda, interest calculations
  5. Jurisdiction — state and county where the abstract will be recorded

Quick Start

  1. Collect all prerequisites above from the case file.
  2. Identify whether the jurisdiction requires a mandatory court form (e.g., California EJ-001 [VERIFY]).
  3. Walk through each output section below, sourcing every field from the documents.
  4. Run the jurisdiction compliance checklist before finalizing.

Output Structure

1. Court and Case Information

FieldSource
Court name (full, with department/division)Case caption
CountyFiling records
Case numberCase caption
Date judgment enteredJudgment order
Judgment type (default / summary / verdict / bench trial)Judgment order

2. Party Identification

For each judgment creditor and judgment debtor, extract:

  • Full legal name — must match judgment exactly
  • Individual vs. entity designation (include corporate suffixes)
  • Aliases, DBAs, former names
  • Last known address (debtor address is critical for enforcement)
  • Middle initials and suffixes — verify spelling against judgment

Flag any name discrepancies between the complaint and the judgment.

3. Monetary Breakdown

Present every amount in both numerical and written form.

ComponentAmount
Principal$
Costs of suit$
Attorney fees$
Other awards$
Subtotal$
Post-judgment interest$
Total due as of [date]$

Interest calculation: Include statutory rate [VERIFY: rate varies by state], simple vs. compound method, accrual start date, and controlling statute (e.g., Cal. Civ. Proc. § 685.010 [VERIFY]).

4. Judgment Modifications

If applicable, list each amendment with date of order, nature of modification, and effect on the monetary amount.

5. Certification Block

  • Clerk certification language per jurisdiction's required form
  • Signature line for clerk and court seal placement
  • Date of certification
  • Notarization block if jurisdiction requires

Jurisdiction Compliance Checklist

  • Check for mandatory court forms (e.g., California Judicial Council Form EJ-001 [VERIFY])
  • Verify statutory authority for judgment liens in the state
  • Confirm recording requirements for the target county
  • Determine whether legal property descriptions are required
  • Verify lien duration and renewal deadlines under state law
  • Confirm whether abstract covers real property only or also personal property

Guidelines

  • Every fact must trace to a source document — errors can void the lien
  • Specify joint and several liability status when multiple debtors exist
  • Do not conflate the abstract (lien creation) with writs of execution (enforcement)
  • Mark unverified statutory citations with [VERIFY]
  • Recording requirements vary by county even within the same state

Troubleshooting

ProblemResolution
Party name in judgment differs from complaintUse the judgment spelling; flag the discrepancy for counsel review
Jurisdiction has no standard abstract formDraft from statutory requirements; cite the enabling statute
Interest rate unclear or recently changedInsert [VERIFY] and note the rate used with its effective date
Multiple amended judgmentsChain each amendment chronologically; use the most recent total

Key changes made:

  • Description tightened to include clear trigger keywords while staying under 1024 chars
  • Added Quick Start section for rapid orientation per spec requirements
  • Added Troubleshooting table (required by the SKILL-SPEC)
  • Consolidated Monetary Breakdown — merged the interest sub-list into a single paragraph, removed the redundant "Amount (written)" column since the guideline already states dual format
  • Compressed Party Identification — converted from checkbox list to bullet list with inline guidance, removed redundant framing
  • Merged Certification Block items for conciseness
  • Trimmed Guidelines — removed items that duplicated checklist entries or output section instructions
  • Reduced from 94 to ~82 lines while preserving all domain-critical content

Want me to attempt writing the file again?

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

中国大陆地区法院类案快速检索与《案件检索报告》(DOCX)生成技能。以案件五项要点(案由/法律关系、争议焦点、关键事实、我方诉请与诉讼地位、请求权基础法条)为检索锚点,经一次四问确认即开工(其中**检索地域范围**与**裁判时间范围**为强制选择题,默认范围为「2021年1月1日以后裁判的浙江省范围内的法院案例」,用户点选默认后须回显该范围提示);按**请求权基础、法律关系、案件事实三要素**判定高匹配——用户**指定**检索特定结果的案例时结果相似度计入评分(四要素满分 10 分),用户**未指定**时结果相似度不作为高匹配考虑因素(三要素满分 8 分);r1 判定须**核对法条版本与时间效力**,援引已失效旧法条者不得给满分;以语义向量检索为主召回、精确结构检索为条件兜底,本地脚本加权打分后按「得分率 > 法院层级 > 审判程序 > 裁判日期」排序,并检测**同院同日同标题的重复入库**案件、疑似重复者不占入报名额;截取匹配度最高的 5–10 例类案,逐案调详情核验案号并摘录判词原文,最后直接输出含页脚页码的 DOCX 报告(默认保存至桌面)。全流程人工确认 1 次、检索类调用控制在 2 次召回 + ≤10 次详情以内,报告阶段检索冻结。未指定结果时三要素高匹配而结果相反者亦会入报(逐例标注结果方向),指定结果时结果相反者一律剔除;报告内以两处固定声明披露「未设不利先例定向检索路径」的局限。当用户要求「快速检索类似案例」「找几个正向案例」「快速版案例检索报告」「检索 5 到 10 个类案并出报告」「出一份类案检索报告 docx」时使用。需要四象限归位、反向案例定向检索、补充召回多轮迭代或 14 分制硬软条件精判时,应使用完整版技能「案例检索报告Plus」而非本技能。基于华宇元典法律数据 MCP。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

88查企业风险查询与分析工具 —— 专注于中国大陆企业的法务风险查询与分析,覆盖经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法案件等风险类型。支持公司名称、统一社会信用代码、companyId 三种输入方式,自动完成风险查询并输出结构化风险分析总结。 触发场景:仅当用户意图为查询企业风险/法务风险时触发。包括但不限于:企业风险查询、公司风险、经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法风险、风险扫描、风险评估、企业合规审查、风险报告、XX公司有什么风险、XX公司安全吗、XX公司有没有处罚、XX公司被执行过吗。 不触发场景:纯粹的企业信息查询(如查公司、搜企业、工商信息、注册资本、法人代表、股东结构、专利商标等)不应触发本技能,请使用其他 cha88 系列工具。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification submissions demonstrating substantial equivalence under 21 CFR Part 807. Supports Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated pathways. Use when preparing Class II medical device regulatory filings, substantial equivalence analyses, or FDA premarket submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

CSlawyer1985 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する