本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

access-indemnity-agreement

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md7.9 KB
  • LICENSE.txt10.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Access and Indemnity Agreement

Short-form, execution-ready right-of-entry contract allocating operational control and risk during pre-closing property inspections — insurance tied to entry, indemnity scoped with discovery carve-out, anti-indemnity statutes addressed.

Quick Start

  1. Run Pre-Draft Intake to collect deal parameters
  2. Draft defined terms and license grant
  3. Draft access procedures with invasive-activity gate
  4. Draft insurance, indemnity, restoration, and confidentiality provisions
  5. Assemble in section order
  6. Run Post-Draft Alignment and Quality Audit

Pre-Draft Intake

Gather before drafting (skip if user says "use defaults" or "just draft"):

  1. Governing law / property location — anti-indemnity, lien, environmental rules
  2. Parties — owner, buyer/recipient, property manager, lender, access administrator
  3. Property — address/legal description, occupancy, tenants, restricted areas, hazards
  4. Deal posture — PSA/LOI status, diligence period, exclusivity, termination triggers
  5. Scope — Phase I only vs Phase II, destructive testing, sampling, drones, roof access
  6. Insurance — limits, additional insureds, primary/noncontributory, subrogation waiver, carrier ratings
  7. Confidentiality — existing NDA, report delivery expectations, privacy limits

Defaults (label when applied): buyer-side; Phase I non-invasive only; $1M/$2M CGL; standard indemnity with discovery carve-out; 48-hour notice; governing law per property state.

ItemDetails
Owner (name/entity/state)
Recipient/Buyer (name/entity/state)
Property Manager
Property (address/legal)
PSA/LOI status + diligence dates
Access Period + notice lead time
Permitted hours + escort rules
Non-invasive activities
Invasive activities (proposed)
Insurance limits + endorsements
Confidentiality/NDA cross-reference
Governing law + venue
Special hazards/tenant constraints

Step 1: Defined Terms and License Grant

Defined terms: Property, Access Period, Investigations, Invasive Activities, Owner Indemnitees, Recipient Representatives, Confidential Information, Work Plan

License grant — characterize as limited, revocable, non-exclusive license (not lease or easement). Recipient has no possessory interest. Subject to Owner's rules and tenant rights.

Step 2: Access Procedures and Activity Gates

Access procedures:

  • [48] hours' prior written notice identifying entrants, purpose, equipment, insurance confirmation
  • Owner may require escorts, reschedule, deny entry for non-compliance
  • No tenant contact without Owner's written consent

Invasive activity gate:

  • Non-invasive: visual inspections, measurements, surveys, Phase I ESA without sampling
  • Invasive (soil borings, sampling, cores, roof/slab penetrations, system shutdowns): requires Owner's prior written consent via approved Work Plan (scope, schedule, contractor licenses, insurance, restoration plan)

Step 3: Insurance Requirements

Tie entry to receipt of acceptable endorsements, not just certificates.

  • CGL occurrence form: [$1M] per occurrence / [$2M] aggregate
  • Workers' comp as required by law; employer's liability [$500K]
  • If invasive approved: umbrella/excess [$5M], Contractor's Pollution Liability [$1M]
  • Additional insureds: Owner, property manager, [lender] — primary and noncontributory
  • Deliver certificates + endorsements (CG 20 10, CG 20 37) [VERIFY] before entry

Step 4: Indemnity, Restoration, and Confidentiality

Indemnity + discovery carve-out:

  • Recipient indemnifies, defends, holds harmless Owner Indemnitees from claims, losses, liens, costs (including attorneys' fees) arising from entry/investigations/breach
  • Carve out mere discovery of pre-existing conditions not caused or exacerbated by Recipient
  • Carve out Owner's [gross negligence/willful misconduct/sole negligence] per governing law [VERIFY]
  • Must cover defense costs, liens, tenant claims, property manager, and lender

Restoration + lien control:

  • Restore to substantially same condition; Owner self-help if repairs not commenced within [5] business days (immediate for safety hazards), costs plus [15]% admin fee
  • Discharge or bond any lien within [10] days after notice

Confidentiality + reports:

  • Covers documents, observations, photos, data from access; disclosure only to bound Representatives
  • Report delivery: [full reports / factual data only / no reports]
  • If Owner declines reports, state non-receipt to avoid "actual knowledge" consequences [VERIFY]

PSA priority clause (if applicable): PSA access provisions control only on express conflict; insurance, indemnity, restoration, and confidentiality survive unless expressly superseded.

Step 5: Assembly Order

  1. Parties, Property, Recitals, License Grant
  2. Access Period, Procedures (notice, hours, escorts, tenant non-interference)
  3. Permitted vs Invasive Activities with Work Plan gate
  4. Insurance Requirements and endorsement delivery
  5. Indemnity, Defense, Survival with discovery carve-out
  6. Restoration, Lien Control, Incident Response with self-help
  7. Confidentiality and Report Handling
  8. Disclaimers, Termination, Dispute Terms, Priority/Integration
  9. Signatures

Post-Draft Alignment

Ask after delivering draft:

  1. Does the scope correctly distinguish non-invasive from invasive for this deal?
  2. Are insurance limits and endorsement requirements acceptable to all parties?
  3. Is there a lender to add as additional insured or notice recipient?
  4. Report delivery election: full reports, factual data only, or no reports (actual-knowledge implications)?

If no response, flag insurance limits and report-delivery election as highest-risk decisions; proceed if authorized.

Quality Audit

  • Access characterized as license, not lease or easement
  • Work Plan approval required before invasive testing
  • Insurance tied to endorsement delivery, not just certificates
  • Indemnity covers defense costs, liens, tenant claims, lender
  • Discovery carve-out for pre-existing conditions included
  • Owner negligence carve-out appropriate for governing law
  • Restoration obligations and self-help remedy included
  • Lien cure periods contractual (not claimed as statutory without verification)
  • Confidentiality/NDA conflict resolved
  • Anti-indemnity statute compliance verified for governing jurisdiction
  • All bracketed terms filled or flagged
  • Environmental reporting obligations not stated as mandatory without verification

Rules

  • Characterize access as license, never lease or easement
  • Require Work Plan approval before invasive testing
  • Tie entry to endorsement delivery, not just certificates
  • Include discovery carve-out for pre-existing conditions; retain liability for exacerbation
  • Use contractual lien cure periods; never claim statutory deadlines without verification
  • For TX/NY/CA/FL: verify anti-indemnity requirements [VERIFY]
  • Environmental reporting is fact- and state-specific; never state as mandatory without verification [VERIFY]
  • If NDA exists, specify which document controls confidentiality
  • Never fabricate statutory citations, insurance form numbers, or anti-indemnity rules
  • All outputs require attorney review in the property's jurisdiction

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

中国大陆地区法院类案快速检索与《案件检索报告》(DOCX)生成技能。以案件五项要点(案由/法律关系、争议焦点、关键事实、我方诉请与诉讼地位、请求权基础法条)为检索锚点,经一次四问确认即开工(其中**检索地域范围**与**裁判时间范围**为强制选择题,默认范围为「2021年1月1日以后裁判的浙江省范围内的法院案例」,用户点选默认后须回显该范围提示);按**请求权基础、法律关系、案件事实三要素**判定高匹配——用户**指定**检索特定结果的案例时结果相似度计入评分(四要素满分 10 分),用户**未指定**时结果相似度不作为高匹配考虑因素(三要素满分 8 分);r1 判定须**核对法条版本与时间效力**,援引已失效旧法条者不得给满分;以语义向量检索为主召回、精确结构检索为条件兜底,本地脚本加权打分后按「得分率 > 法院层级 > 审判程序 > 裁判日期」排序,并检测**同院同日同标题的重复入库**案件、疑似重复者不占入报名额;截取匹配度最高的 5–10 例类案,逐案调详情核验案号并摘录判词原文,最后直接输出含页脚页码的 DOCX 报告(默认保存至桌面)。全流程人工确认 1 次、检索类调用控制在 2 次召回 + ≤10 次详情以内,报告阶段检索冻结。未指定结果时三要素高匹配而结果相反者亦会入报(逐例标注结果方向),指定结果时结果相反者一律剔除;报告内以两处固定声明披露「未设不利先例定向检索路径」的局限。当用户要求「快速检索类似案例」「找几个正向案例」「快速版案例检索报告」「检索 5 到 10 个类案并出报告」「出一份类案检索报告 docx」时使用。需要四象限归位、反向案例定向检索、补充召回多轮迭代或 14 分制硬软条件精判时,应使用完整版技能「案例检索报告Plus」而非本技能。基于华宇元典法律数据 MCP。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

88查企业风险查询与分析工具 —— 专注于中国大陆企业的法务风险查询与分析,覆盖经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法案件等风险类型。支持公司名称、统一社会信用代码、companyId 三种输入方式,自动完成风险查询并输出结构化风险分析总结。 触发场景:仅当用户意图为查询企业风险/法务风险时触发。包括但不限于:企业风险查询、公司风险、经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法风险、风险扫描、风险评估、企业合规审查、风险报告、XX公司有什么风险、XX公司安全吗、XX公司有没有处罚、XX公司被执行过吗。 不触发场景:纯粹的企业信息查询(如查公司、搜企业、工商信息、注册资本、法人代表、股东结构、专利商标等)不应触发本技能,请使用其他 cha88 系列工具。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification submissions demonstrating substantial equivalence under 21 CFR Part 807. Supports Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated pathways. Use when preparing Class II medical device regulatory filings, substantial equivalence analyses, or FDA premarket submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

CSlawyer1985 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する