7,989 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generates structured summaries of mediation and arbitration proceedings, extracting outcomes, settlement terms, monetary amounts, obligations, releases, and enforcement steps. Trigger when the user needs to document mediation settlements, arbitration awards, or partial ADR resolutions from transcripts, agreements, mediator reports, or awards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
欧盟 AI 法案知识引擎——以 70 份官方欧盟来源文件为基础的权威监管问答（包括 2026 年委员会关于 Art. 6 高风险分类的指南草稿——一般原则、附件 I、附件 III）。基于完整条例文本、委员会指南、EDPB/EDPS 意见、《实践守则》、协调标准、FRIA 指南、事件模板和行业特定指引，以条款级引用回答关于 AI 法案的任何问题。当用户询问"EU AI Act"、"AI Act regulation"、"Regulation 2024/1689"、"KI-Verordnung"、要求"explain an AI Act article"、"what does Article X say"、"AI Act requirements"、"AI Act penalties"、"AI Act timeline"、"GPAI obligations"、"high-risk AI"、"prohibited AI practices"、"AI Act and GDPR"、"fundamental rights impact assessment"、"AI Act standards"、"AI Act national implementation"、"AI literacy"、"serious incident reporting"、"Digital Omnibus"、"AI regulatory sandbox"，或任何关于欧盟人工智能监管的问题时，应使用本技能。德语术语同样触发："KI-Gesetz"、"KI-Verordnung"、"Hochrisiko-KI"、"KI-Kompetenz"、"Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung"、"GPAI-Verhaltenskodex"。对于产出分类决定而非知识答案的评估工作流，提议在会话内运行结构化风险等级分类。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts franchise advertising fund contribution agreements or addenda governing franchisee obligations to a centralized marketing fund. Trigger when drafting ad fund agreements, marketing fund addenda, or franchise contribution agreements involving fund administration, contribution calculations, or financial reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing prose humans will read—documentation, commit messages, error messages, explanations, reports, or UI text. Applies Strunk's timeless rules for clearer, stronger, more professional writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged (Prettier), type checking, and tests in the current repo. Use when user wants to add pre-commit hooks, set up Husky, configure lint-staged, or add commit-time formatting/typechecking/testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically document research findings, competitive analysis, market trends, and user insights in Notion. Build searchable research repository for data-driven decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drives development with tests. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage a bug or issue by exploring the codebase to find root cause, then create a GitHub issue with a TDD-based fix plan. Use when user reports a bug, wants to file an issue, mentions "triage", or wants to investigate and plan a fix for a problem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect failing GitHub Actions checks on PRs, fetch detailed logs, summarize failures, create a fix plan, and implement fixes after user approval. For external CI systems, report details only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes recent Codex chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and learning opportunities. Curates personalized learning resources and delivers growth reports to Slack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cycle de coordination ai-01 (coordinateur UNIQUEMENT — jamais sur un worker). Lit memoire + dashboards + inbox + GitHub, merge les PRs pretes, tranche les design-gates, dispatche des grains par lane, reporte. Arguments: [--dispatch] [--focus <topic>]
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and merge student exercise PRs during TP sessions. Arguments: <repo-url> [--class <class-id>] [--timeslot <HH:MM-HH:MM>] [--dry-run]
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a one-shot buying-intent lead scan across Reddit, Twitter/X, Instagram, and TikTok using Xpoz. Finds fresh posts from people actively looking for what a product does or frustrated with its competitors, classifies and prioritizes them, and reports where to engage and who to reach. Use when asked to "find leads", "who is asking for a tool like mine", "find people complaining about [COMPETITOR]", "buying-intent scan", or "social selling opportunities".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze brand or topic sentiment across Twitter, Reddit, and Instagram using Xpoz. Classifies posts as positive/neutral/negative, extracts recurring themes, and generates a sentiment report. Use when asked for "sentiment analysis", "what are people saying about X", "brand sentiment", or "social media opinion on X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One-shot GEO visibility check for a brand using Xpoz. Runs the buyer questions that matter through Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini, and reports where the brand appears, who wins instead, and which surfaces the answers are assembled from. Use when asked to "check my AI visibility", "does ChatGPT recommend us", "GEO audit", "where do we show up in AI answers", or "who wins our category in AI answers".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-activate for sqlspec, SQLSpec, SQLFileLoader, drivers, query builders, named SQL, filters, pagination, Arrow, framework extensions, ADK stores, or observers. Not for ORM repositories — use advanced-alchemy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product Research / 产品研究编译器：当用户要围绕一个产品问题做系统调研、竞品证据、替代方案、行业信号、 用户与市场研究、最佳实践提炼、产品候选池、本地 HTML 研究看板、可视化研究报告或跨职能 Dashboard 时使用。 当用户只有大白话、模糊方向、业务愿望或 Roadmap/PRD 前置材料想法，需要先转成清晰研究目标、研究问题和输出要求时也使用。 适合把研究转成 Research Project、学习报告、证据矩阵、PM 决策看板、候选池、模板、实践任务、业务判断、商业化输入或高门槛应用研究前置。适合“系统研究一个主题” “整理到 Obsidian”“做深度专题”“研究行业最佳实践”“概念解读”“概念源流”“PM 技术评审提问脚本” “行业演进看板”“这个主题对我的产品决策有什么用”“让我系统学会并输出 learning report HTML”。不适合创建 Skill、评审 SKILL.md、普通即时搜索或一次性摘要。 当用户已经要在明确候选项中选一个、需要最终推荐和排除理由时，应使用 decision-research。 当 decision-research 或 grill-me 返回一个可研究、可关闭的精确证据 gap 时，也使用本 Skill 只补 Evidence Delta。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform comprehensive technical reviews of Ruby on Rails applications. Runs automated analysis tools (RubyCritic, Brakeman, bundler-audit, Gitleaks, Debride, linters, SimpleCov, Rails stats, Rails ERD), analyzes code for architecture, security, authorization (Pundit/CanCanCan), dead code, and design issues, and produces a structured markdown report with prioritized findings and a 0-10 score. Use when the user requests a tech review, code audit, project assessment, or quality analysis of a Rails application.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
研究進捗報告書の作成を支援する
Security launch audit for a public web app BEFORE you ship or hand it to a client — "vibe coders are getting sued", systematized. An executable pipeline: classify (static / full-stack / AI) → run sections (secrets+supply-chain, DB, auth, infra+headers, legal, LLM/injection) orchestrating deterministic tools + manual checks → GO/NO-GO report. Adapted from Prajwal Tomar's playbook, extended with prompt-injection / supply-chain / secret-history / dependency-CVE layers. NOT the same as pre-push (that = clean push; this = is the product itself safe to launch). Triggers — "security checklist for the site", "audit before launch", "is the site safe", "check before handing to client".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deliberate system-improvement loop — audit your own Claude Code setup (rules / memory / skills / MCP / agents / registry), evaluate incoming tools via /vet, adopt the worthwhile ones with discipline (backup → verify), and record every decision. Use when bringing in a tool/idea/collection to improve the setup, or when doing a tooling-improvement pass. Triggers — "upgrade the workflow", "audit our setup", "let's improve the tooling", "evaluate this for us", when handed a post/repo/reel with a tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate an incoming workflow upgrade — a skill, MCP server, subagent, library, external service, prompt, or pattern — through one disciplined pipeline before adopting it. Security is a blocking gate. Records every verdict so the same thing is never evaluated twice. Use when considering a new tool from a post, repo, or recommendation. Triggers — "vet this", "should we adopt", "is this safe to install", "evaluate this skill/MCP", "what do you think of this tool".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。