「code quality」の検索結果

Document requirements analysis: Analyzes concept and requirements documents in the docs/ folder, checks requirements against current code, and creates a consolidated difference report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, grade, rewrite, and issue funny evidence-backed tickets for generic AI-slop patterns in prose, social posts, UI/design, and code. Use when asked to de-slop writing, humanize AI copy, grade a draft, review a landing page or generated interface, remove vague claims and repetitive rhetoric, inspect AI-written code for generic abstractions and happy-path-only logic, or ticket someone for a specific quality offense. Do not use to determine whether AI authored something.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, simplicity, and maintainability. Identifies unnecessary abstractions, duplicated logic, oversized functions, missing error handling, and naming issues — then fixes them automatically before presenting the result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

一般コード品質のレビューエージェント。デフォルトのフォールバック先。 可読性、保守性、型安全性、ロギング等の個別スキルへルーティングする。

Dart 3 modern features (through 3.10) and Effective Dart best practices including records, patterns, sealed classes, dot shorthands, null-aware collection elements, and wildcard variables. Use when adopting Dart 3.7+ syntax, using dot shorthands for enums or static members, using null-aware elements in lists or maps, using wildcard _ parameters, improving code quality, or reviewing Dart code conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute code-quality gates for a completed phase including tests, coverage, lint, types, build, CI/CD, staging, migrations, and spec coverage

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security scan + code quality + auto-fix on git push.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or update a professional-grade design system in Figma from a codebase. Use when the user wants to create variables/tokens, build component libraries, create individual components with proper variant sets and variable bindings, set up theming (light/dark modes), document foundations, or reconcile gaps between code and Figma. Also use when the user asks to create or generate any component in Figma — even a single one — since components require proper variable foundations, variant states, and design token bindings to be production-quality. This skill teaches WHAT to build and in WHAT ORDER — it complements the `figma-use` skill which teaches HOW to call the Plugin API. Both skills should be loaded together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate documentation before merging - check completeness, broken links, code example accuracy, and factual correctness. Use when reviewing docs for quality gates or running pre-merge doc validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure .NET/C# code follows maintainable, modern best practices. Use when reviewing or improving C# code, solution structure, async patterns, dependency injection, or testability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously deep-scan entire codebase line-by-line, understand architecture and patterns, then systematically transform it to production-grade, corporate-level professional quality with optimizations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Claude Code skills against the agentskills specification. Catches structural, semantic, and naming issues before users do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task requires exhaustive unabridged output, complete files, or strict prevention of placeholders and skipped code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively improve a Claude Code skill using the skill-reviewer agent until it meets quality standards. Use when improving a skill with multiple quality issues, iterating on a new skill until it meets standards, or automated fix-review cycles instead of manual editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for quality focused software architecture. This skill should be used when users want to write code, design architecture, analyze code, in any case that relates to software development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for quality focused software architecture. This skill should be used when users want to write code, design architecture, analyze code, in any case that relates to software development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コード品質の最終確認。Skill: code-review (built-in) で correctness bug を検出 → main agent が findings を修正 → lint/ty 静的解析 → 条件付きで security-reviewer / critic を spawn (security 関連変更 or plan/requirements.md がある時のみ)。「品質チェックして」「品質ゲート通して」「レビューして」「コードを確認して」「PR 出す前にチェック」「セキュリティ大丈夫？」「コード見て」で発動。

Write, review, or improve SwiftUI code following best practices for state management, view composition, performance, macOS-specific APIs, and iOS 26+ Liquid Glass adoption. Use when building new SwiftUI features, refactoring existing views, reviewing code quality, or adopting modern SwiftUI patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Codex/Claude agent skills, profile manifests, and skill-related deploy changes before they ship. Use when creating, editing, importing, installing, or reviewing SKILL.md files, agent manifests, optional third-party skills, or plugin skill bundles. Checks trigger quality, progressive disclosure, evidence gates, security, hallucination risk, validation, and deployment impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, review, or improve SwiftUI code following best practices for state management, view composition, performance, macOS-specific APIs, and iOS 26+ Liquid Glass adoption. Use when building new SwiftUI features, refactoring existing views, reviewing code quality, or adopting modern SwiftUI patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for quality focused software architecture. This skill should be used when users want to write code, design architecture, analyze code, in any case that relates to software development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously deep-scan entire codebase line-by-line, understand architecture and patterns, then systematically transform it to production-grade, corporate-level professional quality with optimizations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor Python code to improve quality while keeping functionality intact. Use when cleaning up complexity, removing duplication, or tightening structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。