本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

dotnet-best-practices

Ensure .NET/C# code follows maintainable, modern best practices. Use when reviewing or improving C# code, solution structure, async patterns, dependency injection, or testability.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md7.4 KB
  • CHANGELOG.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

.NET/C# Best Practices

Optimized for current .NET SDK-style projects, C# 12+, ASP.NET Core LTS, and current xUnit, NUnit, or MSTest workflows.

Your task is to ensure .NET/C# code in the selected scope or current solution meets the best practices specific to this project. This includes:

  • Leverage native parallel subagent dispatch and 200k+ context windows where available.

Documentation & Structure

  • Create comprehensive XML documentation comments for all public classes, interfaces, methods, and properties
  • Include parameter descriptions and return value descriptions in XML comments
  • Follow the established namespace structure: {Core|Console|App|Service}.{Feature}

Design Patterns & Architecture

  • Use primary constructor syntax for dependency injection (e.g., public class MyClass(IDependency dependency))
  • Implement the Command Handler pattern with generic base classes (e.g., CommandHandler<TOptions>)
  • Use interface segregation with clear naming conventions (prefix interfaces with 'I')
  • Follow the Factory pattern for complex object creation.

Dependency Injection & Services

  • Use constructor dependency injection with null checks via ArgumentNullException
  • Register services with appropriate lifetimes (Singleton, Scoped, Transient)
  • Use Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection patterns
  • Implement service interfaces for testability

Resource Management & Localization

  • Use ResourceManager for localized messages and error strings
  • Separate LogMessages and ErrorMessages resource files
  • Access resources via _resourceManager.GetString("MessageKey")

Async/Await Patterns

  • Use async/await for all I/O operations and long-running tasks
  • Return Task or Task<T> from async methods
  • Use ConfigureAwait(false) where appropriate
  • Handle async exceptions properly

Testing Standards

  • Use MSTest framework with FluentAssertions for assertions
  • Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)
  • Use Moq for mocking dependencies
  • Test both success and failure scenarios
  • Include null parameter validation tests

Configuration & Settings

  • Use strongly-typed configuration classes with data annotations
  • Implement validation attributes (Required, NotEmptyOrWhitespace)
  • Use IConfiguration binding for settings
  • Support appsettings.json configuration files

Semantic Kernel & AI Integration

  • Use Microsoft.SemanticKernel for AI operations
  • Implement proper kernel configuration and service registration
  • Handle AI model settings (ChatCompletion, Embedding, etc.)
  • Use structured output patterns for reliable AI responses

Error Handling & Logging

  • Use structured logging with Microsoft.Extensions.Logging
  • Include scoped logging with meaningful context
  • Throw specific exceptions with descriptive messages
  • Use try-catch blocks for expected failure scenarios

Performance & Security

  • Use C# 12+ features and .NET 8 optimizations where applicable
  • Implement proper input validation and sanitization
  • Use parameterized queries for database operations
  • Follow secure coding practices for AI/ML operations

Code Quality

  • Ensure SOLID principles compliance
  • Avoid code duplication through base classes and utilities
  • Use meaningful names that reflect domain concepts
  • Keep methods focused and cohesive
  • Implement proper disposal patterns for resources

Anti-Patterns

  • Constructing infrastructure inside business code: It defeats dependency injection and makes testing or observability much harder.
  • Skipping cancellation and logging in I/O paths: Modern .NET services need both operational visibility and cooperative shutdown behavior.
  • Hiding configuration behind magic strings: Options drift across environments when the contract is not explicit.

Verification Protocol

Before claiming "skill applied successfully":

  1. Pass/fail: The Dotnet Best Practices implementation names the target runtime, framework version, and affected files.
  2. Pass/fail: Build, lint, test, or equivalent local validation is run for the changed surface.
  3. Pass/fail: Edge cases for errors, dependency drift, and environment differences are addressed or explicitly out of scope.
  4. Pressure-test scenario: Apply the workflow to a change that passes happy-path tests but fails one boundary condition.
  5. Success metric: Zero untested success claims; every implementation claim maps to a command or artifact.

Before and After Example

// Before
public sealed class WeatherService
{
    public async Task<string> GetAsync()
    {
        using var client = new HttpClient();
        return await client.GetStringAsync("https://api.example.com/weather");
    }
}

// After
public sealed class WeatherService(HttpClient client, ILogger<WeatherService> logger)
{
    public async Task<string> GetAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        logger.LogInformation("Fetching weather data");
        return await client.GetStringAsync("weather", cancellationToken);
    }
}

Uses dependency injection, logging, and cancellation instead of constructing infrastructure per call.

Common Pitfalls

  • Constructing infrastructure inside business code: It defeats dependency injection and makes testing or observability much harder.
  • Treating async methods like fire-and-forget work: Exceptions and cancellations disappear unless the call chain is designed for them.
  • Burying configuration in magic strings: Runtime behavior drifts across environments when options are not strongly typed.
<!-- MCP:START --> <!-- PORTABILITY:START -->

Cross-Client Portability

This skill is written to stay usable across GitHub Copilot, Claude Code, and Codex.

  • GitHub Copilot: keep the folder in a Copilot-visible skill path or wrap the workflow in project instructions when folder discovery is unavailable.
  • Claude Code: keep the folder in a local skills directory or a compatible plugin source.
  • Codex: install or sync the folder into $CODEX_HOME/skills/dotnet-best-practices and restart Codex after major changes.
<!-- PORTABILITY:END -->

MCP Availability And Fallback

Preferred MCP Server: None required

  • Fallback prompt: "Use the .NET/C# Best Practices skill without MCP. Rely on the local SKILL.md, bundled references or scripts, and manual verification. Show the exact commands, evidence, and final checks you used before concluding."
  • If the current host does not expose a matching server, use the bundled references, scripts, native toolchain, and manual workflow already described in this skill.
  • Treat direct local verification, rendered output, logs, tests, or screenshots as the fallback evidence path before completion.
<!-- MCP:END -->

Related Skills

  • csharp-xunit: Use it when the workflow also needs modern xUnit test design in C#.
  • code-quality: Use it when the workflow also needs two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), maintainability, and refactoring guidance.
  • development-workflow: Use it when the workflow also needs planning, quality gates, and delivery tracking.
  • microsoft-development: Use it when the workflow also needs microsoft development guidance.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

AI-powered adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector design for gene therapy including capsid engineering, promoter selection, and tropism optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 11 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure/rebuttal-audit). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, audit my rebuttal, check my response draft, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見, 評估回覆, 논문 작성, 초록 작성, 논문 수정, 논문 계획을 도와줘, 심사 의견 반영, 답변서 점검, AI 사용 고지.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

bg-szy のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する