本文へ移動
cccskills

「decide」の検索結果

662 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Guide a startup to set a single quantified traction goal and define the critical path of milestones to reach it. Use whenever a founder needs to prioritize activities, set growth goals, define milestones, decide what NOT to work on, plan quarterly/yearly execution, cascade goals to teams, escape the 'too many things to do' trap, or apply a binary on-path/off-path filter to proposed work. Activates on phrases like 'traction goal', 'critical path', 'what should we focus on', 'too many priorities', 'prioritization', 'milestones', 'quarterly planning', 'yearly goals', 'OKRs', 'where should I spend my time', 'what NOT to do', 'company planning', 'goal setting', 'DuckDuckGo', 'roadmap'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

Decide whether a request is scope creep — "is this in scope", "is this scope creep", "should I push back on this client request", "draft a boundary reply". Returns in-scope, creep or grey-zone with a suggested reply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DrNabeelKhan/maxim22026年9月17日 更新

Decide what to build — product strategy, roadmap, feature prioritization, product-market fit, pricing model, backlog, sprint planning, product vision, RICE, JTBD, OKRs. Distinct from designing or building it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DrNabeelKhan/maxim22026年9月17日 更新

Decides how to test .NET code. Unit vs integration vs E2E decision tree, test doubles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

rudironsoni/Synaxis22026年3月17日 更新

Use when standing up a fresh deployment of this codebase (or the public vigyan-site-os template) — populates company identity, branding and starting content without committing any of it, and decides for each value whether it belongs in platform env, encrypted DB secrets, DB config, or an admin screen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aryannema/vigyan-site-os22026年10月2日 更新

Use when a high-stakes analysis, citation set, or decision should be checked by a second independent AI agent that verifies rather than decides, or when disagreement between agents must be surfaced for the human to adjudicate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

danstrem2/clawdbot-skill-master-pack22026年2月1日 更新

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Generate a realistic-human, dialogue-driven short-drama clip — one shot, or a few hard-cut shots inside one job — from a script or scene description using the Ofox video API (Seedance 2.5). Runs a short creative brief when the input leaves beat, aspect ratio, emotional arc or camera register open (one held take, a travelling take, or a multi-shot cut list) ("Let the AI decide" is offered on the taste questions, never on a must-ask one, and never as the default), writes a structured prompt (header manifest, timestamped shots, quoted dialogue with delivery notes, consistency lock), shows a cost estimate, then calls ofox-video-core to submit, poll, download, and report the real cost. Use when a user asks to turn a script beat into video, e.g. "generate scene 3 of this script, two characters talking, 15 seconds", "make a vertical short-drama clip of these two arguing in a kitchen", "turn this dialogue into a 12-second video", or "give me a realistic short-drama shot of a couple breaking up at a train station". Do not use for silent product/brand shots (see seedance-ad-creative), for anime- or manga-styled scenes (see seedance-anime-drama), for one person addressing the viewer rather than another character — a script read from a supplied portrait is talking-head, an idea pulled out of an article is explainer — or for anything not involving people/dialogue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ofoxai/skills22026年9月22日 更新

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Turn a novel/script excerpt into an anime-style storyboard shot using the Ofox image and video APIs. Runs a short creative brief first (how many shots, the aspect ratio before any image exists, which animation look; "Let the AI decide" is offered on the taste questions, never on a must-ask one, and never as the default), generates the character with ofox-image-core — one opening frame for a single shot, a design sheet to confirm plus one opening frame per shot for a sequence — then feeds each frame to ofox-video-core as `--frame-first-image`, so every shot starts on an image of that character rather than on a text description alone. Use when a user asks to turn a story excerpt into an anime video, e.g. "turn this novel excerpt into an anime video", "make an anime-style storyboard clip of this scene", "generate a manga-drama shot with this character", or "turn this chapter into an anime short with the same character in every shot". Do not use for realistic-human dialogue scenes with no anime styling (see seedance-short-drama), silent product/brand shots (see seedance-ad-creative), or plain catalog footage (see seedance-product-video).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ofoxai/skills22026年9月22日 更新

Meta-skill that orchestrates the discourse skill suite: routes between steel-man-argument, socratic-questioning, toulmin-argument-analysis, logical-fallacy-detector, bad-faith-rhetoric-detector, discourse-elision-analyzer, forensic-speech-structure, and productive-discourse-facilitator. Use when analyzing conversations, facilitating discourse, or operating as a dialogue copilot. Maintains mode (silent analysis, coaching overlay, active facilitator) and decides which skills to invoke based on conversation dynamics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Decides HOW to mutate a DAG when a node fails, quality is below threshold, or new information changes the plan. Selects from mutation strategies (add node, replace agent, fork paths, loop back, downgrade model) based on failure type, cost budget, and execution history. Activate on "DAG failed how to fix", "mutation strategy", "replan on failure", "adaptive DAG", "recovery strategy", "what to do when node fails". NOT for detecting failures (use dag-quality), executing mutations (use dag-planner), or runtime execution (use dag-runtime).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Design an agent's handling of obligations, prohibitions, permissions, and conflicts among norms and goals. Use when an autonomous agent must decide which norms apply and what to do when they conflict. NOT for simple fixed policy checks, ordinary BDI commitment design, or organizational metaphor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新