「quality」の検索結果

Use when completing a TDD step and wanting a quality check. Reviews test quality after RED, implementation correctness after GREEN, and scenario completeness after REFACTOR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep code review with web research. Use when double-checking code against latest docs, verifying dependency versions, or reviewing security concerns. Complements automatic quality hook with ecosystem verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform thorough code reviews with actionable, prioritized feedback. Use when a user asks to review code, check code quality, find bugs, review a pull request, audit code for issues, or get feedback on implementation. Covers correctness, security, performance, readability, and best practices across languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ESLint is the standard linting tool for JavaScript and TypeScript projects. It statically analyzes your code to find problems, enforce coding conventions, and catch bugs before they reach production. ESLint 9 introduced the flat config format, replacing the legacy `.eslintrc` system with a simpler, more composable `eslint.config.js` file. With a rich plugin ecosystem covering React, TypeScript, accessibility, and import ordering, ESLint is the backbone of code quality in modern web development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks DRY/KISS/YAGNI/architecture compliance with quantitative Code Quality Score. Validates decisions via MCP Ref. Reports with SEC-/PERF-/MNT-/ARCH-/BP-/OPT- prefixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score an Instagram creator's (or a list of creators') audience authenticity and engagement quality using Xpoz. Measures real engagement rate against views rather than follower count, the bot/spam share of their comments, and an overall 0-100 authenticity score for influencer vetting and partner selection. Use when asked to "vet this influencer", "are their followers real", "check engagement quality for @username", "rate these Instagram accounts", "compare creators before a sponsorship", or when the user pastes a list of Instagram handles to evaluate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing or auditing a library of Claude Code skills, agents, slash commands, and workflows — frontmatter correctness, routing quality, tool allowlists, command arg-hints, workflow meta/phase coherence, cross-reference coherence, single-responsibility, file structure, and anti-pattern detection. Triggers on mentions of "review skills", "audit agents", "skill library", "agent definition review", "review this command", "review this workflow", "is this skill right", or when iterating on `.claude/skills/`, `.claude/agents/`, `.claude/commands/`, or `.claude/workflows/` directories. For code review of source code see code-review-and-quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-assembles a domain-specific expert panel (7–10 experts), scores any content or strategy artifact against a typed rubric, and iterates until the aggregate hits 90+ (max 3 rounds). Use as a quality gate on copy, email sequences, landing-page drafts, strategy docs, charts, titles, or recruiting evaluations — or when another skill needs a final review gate on its output. Triggers on "expert panel this", "score this", "rate these variants", "quality check this", "panel review", "expert score", "evaluate this copy/strategy/page". For variant generation and multi-round conversion optimization see autoresearch; for live-URL CRO auditing see conversion-ops; for the scripted content-production pipeline see content-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code auditor that grades software projects and the agents/developers who built them. Produces structured JSON + Markdown reports with a standardized rubric. Evaluates architecture, correctness, testing, authorship cohesiveness, ghost code, and more. Optionally ingests tmux session logs for process evidence and interrogates agents about specific problems found. Use when asked to "audit", "grade", "evaluate", "review code quality", "rate this project", "score the agents", or "assess the codebase". Especially useful after Marcus multi-agent experiments to grade agent output and track quality over time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve or review ordinary dygo code changes for simplicity, focused scope, canonical ownership, clear boundaries, and verifiable behavior. Use for normal implementation and refactoring quality; use dygo-thermonuclear-review only for an explicitly severe audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download YouTube videos with customizable quality and format options. Use this skill when the user asks to download, save, or grab YouTube videos. Supports various quality settings (best, 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p), multiple formats (mp4, webm, mkv), and audio-only downloads as MP3.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds production-quality UIs. Use when building or modifying user-facing interfaces. Use when creating components, implementing layouts, managing state, or when the output needs to look and feel production-quality rather than AI-generated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or improve Jupyter notebooks iteratively with quality scoring. Arguments: <new|improve|fix> <path> [--topic] [--domain] [--level] [--quality] [--max-iter]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Linting and code quality workflow for Software Metrics Machine. Covers ESLint 9.x flat config, Prettier formatting, lint-staged (auto-fix on commit), per-workspace configs, TypeScript strict mode, and all lint commands. USE FOR: lint, eslint, prettier, format, code style, linting, lint fix, auto-fix, check style, code quality, lint-staged, typecheck, type-check, tsc noEmit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests (use tdd skill), building (use build commands), commit hooks setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application of Six Sigma quality methodology to AI agent process improvement and reliability

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aesthetic assessment and design scoring across 6 dimensions. Use for UI critique, design review, visual quality assessment, remix suggestions. Activate on "design critique", "aesthetic review", "UI assessment", "visual quality", "design score", "remix this design". NOT for implementation (use frontend-developer), accessibility-only audits (use color-contrast-auditor), or brand identity creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenLineage, DataHub, Marquez for data lineage tracking and impact analysis. Activate on: data lineage, OpenLineage, DataHub, Marquez, impact analysis, data catalog, column lineage, data discovery. NOT for: data quality validation (use data-quality-guardian), dbt documentation (use dbt-analytics-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides HOW to mutate a DAG when a node fails, quality is below threshold, or new information changes the plan. Selects from mutation strategies (add node, replace agent, fork paths, loop back, downgrade model) based on failure type, cost budget, and execution history. Activate on "DAG failed how to fix", "mutation strategy", "replan on failure", "adaptive DAG", "recovery strategy", "what to do when node fails". NOT for detecting failures (use dag-quality), executing mutations (use dag-planner), or runtime execution (use dag-runtime).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assigns confidence scores to agent outputs based on multiple factors including source quality, consistency, and reasoning depth. Produces calibrated confidence estimates. Activate on 'confidence score', 'how confident', 'certainty level', 'output confidence', 'reliability score'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies when task outputs require iteration based on quality signals, unmet requirements, or explicit feedback. Triggers appropriate re-execution strategies. Activate on 'needs iteration', 'retry needed', 'not good enough', 'try again', 'refine output'. NOT for feedback generation (use dag-feedback-synthesizer) or convergence tracking (use dag-convergence-monitor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis after code modifications. Triggers on: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis. NOT for full build verification (see mk:verify); NOT for test coverage (see mk:testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate Jira ticket complexity + inconsistencies via the jira-evaluator agent. Read-only. Triggers: 'evaluate KEY', 'analyze ticket complexity for KEY', 'check ticket quality for KEY'. NOT for estimation (mk:jira-estimator); NOT for full RCA (mk:jira-analyst).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。