「repo」の検索結果

[Project Management] Use when you need to generate project status reports, track dependencies, manage risk registers, and facilitate team sync meetings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Research] Use when you need to synthesize research findings into structured report using template.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Testing] Use when you need to drive an integration-test suite to fully green — each round runs /integration-test-verify (whole system by default, or the target named in the prompt), and on ANY failure combines /debug-investigate + /integration-test-review (report-only) to adjudicate the fault (test wrong · test not optimal · source wrong), then /fix to resolve it at the owning layer, then /changes-review on that round's fix diff, then re-runs a FRESH full verify — looping until the whole suite passes its 2-consecutive-green-runs gate with zero failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Git] Use when you need to resolve git merge/cherry-pick/rebase conflicts with backup, analysis, and reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Project Management] Use when you need to generate an HTML mockup report from PBI and story artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Documentation] Use when finding technical documentation for libraries, frameworks, repositories, or implementation topics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Quality] Use when you need to combine /changes-review + /fix in a recursive loop — each round runs /changes-review (report-only) to surface validated findings over a fixed diff scope, then /fix to resolve them, then loops again with a FRESH full /changes-review over the CHANGED diff until one complete pass produces zero validated findings (nothing left to fix).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Architecture] Use when auditing the ENTIRE project architecture and production readiness in one pass — bundles architecture-review + architecture-scalability-review + production-readiness-review at project or diff scope, then synthesizes one consolidated Architecture Health Report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Quality] Use when reviewing architecture compliance for layers, messaging, service boundaries, CQRS, repos, entity events, and data/consistency/tenancy boundaries. Universal architecture laws, coupling taxonomy and the anti-pattern catalog live in `.claude/docs/architecture-knowledge.md` (project docs always outrank it).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when raising code quality or test coverage across a .NET, Java, or Python repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing a repository for evidence-backed gaps between code, SPECs, architecture, and documentation — before a release, after a review, or when the user asks what is missing or divergent. Confirmed gaps become Draft SPECs via write-specs, a tracked GitHub Epic via create-issues, and orchestrated execution via orchestrator, with an explicit approval gate before any external action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when initializing or migrating an AI agent harness in a repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting a new .NET/Blazor/Angular MVP project in an empty repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user reports a hard bug, unexpected failure, or performance regression that needs root-cause analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kova/OpenClaw validation: benchmarks, release gates, scenarios, perf reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold and formally review a new Agent Skill in this marketplace repo. Covers valid SKILL.md generation, directory layout, registry entries, and spec auditing. Use when adding a skill, validating frontmatter, or checking marketplace readiness before a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses ecosystem-native release and changelog tooling (Changesets, Melos, release-plz) plus binary distribution (GitHub Release tarballs, install.sh) when the product is an executable. Use for release CI, install.sh, versioning, CHANGELOGs, shipping MCP/CLI without clone, or meta repos that only ship skills via npx skills—not domain app tutorials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain stewardship protocol continuity and tool/personality boundaries. Use when a repo agent needs steward-mode threshold checks, self-model update decisions, delegation hygiene, boundary violation review, or handoff-safe continuity context without overclaiming steward personality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Mixture of Experts (MoE) audit on any topic, plan, codebase, evidence archive, or process. Dynamically spawns specialized subagents with different critical lenses to cross-reference findings and detect flaws, overlap, retention issues, or drift. Use when designing architectures, analyzing complex code, verifying multi-step plans, classifying evidence artifacts, or looking for duplicated intent in a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critically analyze whether a product, repo, skill, plugin, harness, or architecture vision still fits the real application, user intent, implementation, evidence, and likely future direction. Use when asked to assess vision vs application, predict future fit, critique roadmap direction, analyze strategic intent, or decide whether to keep, refine, pivot, or kill a plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after PROJECT_GUIDE.md exists, when the user asks if a project is worth their time, should they build vs buy, or invokes project-worth-my-time. Follow-up to explain-new-project—weighs project context (files, git history, chat) to recommend whether to invest in a repo, cherry-pick a feature, park the idea, pass, or use an existing polished product instead. Optionally enriched by a personal-memory MCP (e.g. Pieces) when one is available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run on an existing project to decide KEEP / MERGE / ARCHIVE — never limbo. Forces a call on tools that already exist and may have stopped earning their keep. Trigger on "is this still worth keeping", "audit this repo", "tech-debt cleanup", "sweep the folder", "what's dead here", or any signal that something hasn't been touched in months. Judged from both the agent lens (still legible, still drivable, still safe) and the human lens (do I still reach for it, does it nag). Includes a non-negotiable footgun check for stale pipelines that can overwrite live data. Outputs a backed AUDIT.md and a one-line verdict note in the project root docs. Do NOT load for greenfield projects (use new-project-gate), one-off bug fixes, or when the answer is already obvious.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a ready-to-paste social post kit for an app, tool, or project launch or update — "make social posts", "launch posts", "post kit", "prep socials", "promote this". Produces one Markdown file with finished posts for X, Reddit, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, and short-form video, plus a pre-post checklist. Pull real facts from the project (repo, release, what it does, OS, links).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。