Academic research assistant — literature review + methodology (quant/qual) + paper outline (IMRaD) + citation + research gap analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
809 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Academic research assistant — literature review + methodology (quant/qual) + paper outline (IMRaD) + citation + research gap analysis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' 'optimize for Claude/Gemini,' 'llms.txt,' 'OKF,' 'Open Knowledge Format,' 'knowledge bundle,' or 'agent-readable site.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional LaTeX writing assistant. Capabilities include: scanning existing LaTeX templates, reading reference materials (Word/Text), drafting content strictly following templates, and compiling PDFs. Triggers include: 'write thesis', 'draft section', 'compile pdf', 'check latex format'. Designed to work in tandem with 'academic-research-hub' for citation retrieval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transparent, rigorous research with full methodology — not a black-box API wrapper. Conducts exhaustive investigation through mandated 2-cycle research per theme, APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 3 user checkpoints. Self-contained using native OpenClaw tools (web_search, web_fetch, sessions_spawn). Use for literature reviews, competitive intelligence, or any research requiring academic rigor and reproducibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collaborative writing partner that assists with research, outlining, drafting, citations, and iterative feedback. Helps writers create high-quality content while maintaining their unique voice and style.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ask Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini a question and capture the full trace behind the answer (the search queries each engine ran, the pages it retrieved, and the sources it cited, span by span). Use when asked to "trace an AI answer", "see what AI engines cite", "check AI citations", "which sources does ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini use", "why does the AI recommend X", or for any GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) measurement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts filing-ready Annual Reports for State Charity Bureaus with certified financials, governance disclosures, and required attachments. Extracts organizational, financial, and programmatic data from uploaded documents, researches state-specific filing requirements, and produces a penalty-of-perjury-certified report. Use when drafting charity bureau annual reports, nonprofit compliance filings, charitable solicitation renewals, or state charity registration renewals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates structured U.S. art law summaries with Bluebook citations, doctrinal analysis, and stakeholder guidance. Use when researching art law precedents, advising on art transactions, preparing for art market litigation, or surveying a doctrine or statute across ownership, provenance, copyright, VARA, NAGPRA, authentication, NFTs, or AI-generated art.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces an enforcement-aware Animal Welfare Act compliance audit for USDA/APHIS-regulated facilities. Maps Form 7002 inspection citations to verified 9 C.F.R. Parts 1-3 requirements, analyzes NCI severity and recurrence patterns, evaluates core compliance programs (PVC, IACUC, housing, records, transport), and outputs a prioritized corrective action plan with proof artifacts. Use when auditing AWA compliance, reviewing USDA inspection reports, preparing for license renewal, conducting diligence, or assessing enforcement risk. Trigger: Animal Welfare Act, AWA, USDA, APHIS, Form 7002, IACUC, PVC, exhibitor, dealer, research facility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces structured aviation law summaries with Bluebook citations covering U.S. and international regulatory frameworks, treaties, and case law. Use when drafting an aviation law summary, FAA/DOT/TSA compliance overview, Montreal/Warsaw Convention liability analysis, air service agreement review, accident liability synopsis, or aviation regulatory research memo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts the appellant's opening brief challenging a lower court decision in federal or state appellate courts. Covers issue selection, standard of review framing, record citation, argument structure, and procedural compliance under FRAP 28/32 or state equivalents. Use when preparing an appellant's opening brief, selecting appellate issues, structuring appellate arguments, or demonstrating reversible error on appeal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a cross-referenced U.S. nonprofit annual filing package for state charity-bureau registration. Produces Full Compliance Package, Form-Field Mode, or Executive Briefing with source citations, disclosure cross-checks, and filing instructions. Trigger when the user drafts annual report submissions, renewal packets, penalty-of-perjury certifications, or charity bureau filings. Also trigger on Form RRF-1, CHAR500, BCO-10, nonprofit annual report, charity registration renewal, or fundraiser disclosure attachments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts and analyzes U.S. appellate amicus curiae briefs for non-parties with Rule 29/Rule 37 compliance, unique perspective development, and Bluebook-ready citations. Use when asked to draft or review an amicus brief, friend-of-the-court brief, non-party brief, or anything involving FRAP 29, Supreme Court Rule 37, or appellate amicus practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates appellate-filing-ready Tables of Contents, Tables of Authorities, and Certificates of Compliance under FRAP 32(g) and related rules. Produces defensible word-count calculations with transparent exclusions and anti-hallucination guardrails for pagination and citations. Covers federal circuits, state appellate courts, and U.S. Supreme Court variations. Use when building TOC, TOA, compliance certificates, formatting briefs for filing, or when the user mentions word count calculation, FRAP 32 compliance, appellate brief assembly, or page numbering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep multi-source technical research with citations — tech evaluation, ecosystem/standards comparison. NOT for API docs (mk:docs-finder), codebase discovery (mk:scout), or project Q&A (mk:ask-me).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects fabricated content, false citations, and unverifiable claims in agent outputs. Uses source verification and consistency checking. Activate on 'detect hallucination', 'fact check', 'verify claims', 'check accuracy', 'find fabrications'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze hierarchical DAG-like systems by separating undirected substrate from ordering metadata, then classifying diamonds, mixers, shortcuts, and hidden cycle structure. Use for workflow architecture, citation or genealogy DAG comparison, and information-flow diagnosis. NOT for ordinary cycle detection in arbitrary graphs, one-node runtime debugging, or systems with no real ordering constraint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Methodology for eliciting expert knowledge about cognitive processes, decisions, and mental models in complex tasks
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill outlines the emergency management of suspected adrenal crisis, recommending immediate parenteral hydrocortisone (100 mg adult, 50 mg/m² pediatric) plus fluid resuscitation, then 200 mg/24 h (50–100 mg/m²/24 h pediatric) hydrocortisone. Trigger when patient presents with hypotension, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, or unexplained shock suggestive of adrenal insufficiency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build bilingual, evidence-backed, SIEGER v2 customer intelligence reports for foreign-trade leads. Use when OpenClaw or a sales operator needs claim-level citations, decision gates, an industry-specific analysis lens, a non-fabricated verdict card, and sales angles that require approval before downstream outreach drafting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain a review-first Markdown knowledge base for Codex practices with source provenance, engineering capture, citation-aware queries, explicit archive and promotion, and deterministic linting. Use when asked to capture a durable engineering lesson, ingest Codex research, query or archive what the repository knows, check wiki health, reconcile conflicting guidance, or promote verified knowledge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。