本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

annual-report-charity-bureau

Generates a cross-referenced U.S. nonprofit annual filing package for state charity-bureau registration. Produces Full Compliance Package, Form-Field Mode, or Executive Briefing with source citations, disclosure cross-checks, and filing instructions. Trigger when the user drafts annual report submissions, renewal packets, penalty-of-perjury certifications, or charity bureau filings. Also trigger on Form RRF-1, CHAR500, BCO-10, nonprofit annual report, charity registration renewal, or fundraiser disclosure attachments.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md8.0 KB
  • LICENSE.txt10.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Annual Report for State Charity Bureau

Charity bureau annual filings carry perjury certifications and jurisdiction-specific deadlines, audit thresholds, oath language, attachments, and fee schedules. This skill produces a source-documented filing package ensuring internal consistency between the 990, financial statements, and state disclosures.

Quick Start

  1. Gather intake (state, period, revenue, fundraiser use, output mode)
  2. Normalize entity data and flag source conflicts
  3. Research state-specific requirements from official sources
  4. Draft report sections with cross-referenced tables
  5. Assemble filing package with exhibits, certification, and instructions
  6. Run post-draft alignment check

Pre-Draft Intake

Gather before drafting (skip only if user says "use defaults"):

  1. Filing state and year
  2. Reporting period (start/end, fiscal year end)
  3. Total revenue (determines audit/review thresholds)
  4. Professional fundraiser/solicitor/co-venturer use
  5. Output mode: full-compliance (default), form-field, or executive-briefing

Request documents: articles/charter, bylaws, board minutes, Form 990 + schedules, financial statements (audited/reviewed/compiled), contracts, fundraising records, registration correspondence.

Defaults when user is silent (label each [ASSUMED]): annual renewal/solicitation report; last completed 12-month period; audit threshold per state rule; no professional fundraisers unless documents indicate otherwise.

Step 1 — Intake Normalization

Build a normalization table tracking each field's value, source document, and conflicts:

FieldValueSourceConflict / Note
Legal name
EIN
State charity reg. number
Fiscal year end
Reporting period
State of filing
Revenue basis
Fundraiser use

Flag cross-source discrepancies (e.g., 990 revenue vs. audited financials) with [CONFLICT — VERIFY WITH COUNSEL].

Step 2 — State-Requirements Research

Use official sources only: agency website, statute, admin code, filing instructions, fee schedule, portal guidance. Record URL + publish date for each source. Mark unverified details [TO BE CONFIRMED].

Requirements matrix:

TopicRequirementSourceApplies?Status
Filing form/portal
Deadline
Fees / payment method
Audit/review/compilation thresholds
Mandatory attachments
Required signatories
Oath language
Notarization / signature method
Fundraiser disclosure fields

Step 3 — Draft Report Sections

Draft in this order unless the state form dictates otherwise:

  1. Organizational Identity — legal name, DBA, EIN, reg. number, addresses, solicitation channels, reporting period, material changes
  2. Governance — board roster with roles, terms, compensation, relationship disclosures
  3. Financial Position — comparative financial summary, variance analysis, ratios
  4. Programs and Impact — descriptions, geography, beneficiaries, outputs, outcomes, expenses
  5. Fundraising and Compliance — disclosures by method, professional fundraiser schedule if applicable
  6. Attachments and Filing Execution — exhibits index, certification block, filing instructions

Output Tables

Governance Roster

NameRoleTerm startTerm endCompensationRelationship/disclosure

Financial Summary (comparative)

Line itemCurrent yrPrior yrVariance $Variance %Source
Contributions and grants
Program service revenue
Investment income
Special events net
Total revenue
Program expenses
Management/general
Fundraising
Total expenses
Change in net assets
Total assets / liabilities / net assets

Financial Ratios

MetricFormulaOutputNote
Program expense ratioProgram exp. / total exp.
Fundraising efficiencyFundraising exp. / total contributions
Operating reserves (months)Unrestricted net assets / (total exp. / 12)

Fundraising Disclosures

MethodGross raisedDirect costsNet proceedsState-required notes

Professional Fundraiser Schedule (if applicable)

EntityRoleContract datesAmount paidAmount raisedReg. IDAttached?

Step 4 — Assemble Filing Package

Attachments index:

ExhibitDescriptionRequired by stateIncludedCitation
AForm 990 + schedules
BAudit/review/compilation report
CFundraiser/solicitor contracts
DBoard resolution
EOther state-required docs

Certification block: Use exact statutory oath language when available; flag [VERIFY] otherwise. Default: "I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of [STATE] that I have examined this report and attachments and believe them true, correct, and complete."

Filing instructions table:

ItemDetail
Filing method
Deadline
Fee
Extension process
Originals/copies required
Notarization requirement

Step 5 — Mode-Specific Output

ModeContent
Full Compliance Package (default)Narrative + all tables + exhibits index + signatures + filing instructions
Form-Field ModeField-by-field responses matching state form/portal with linked source evidence
Executive BriefingLeadership summary of filing posture, risks, and open items

Post-Draft Alignment

After delivering the package, confirm with user:

  1. Do financial figures match records? Any 990-vs-financial-statement discrepancies?
  2. Are board members/officers current? Any compensation or relationship updates?
  3. Need additional output mode (form-field or executive briefing)?
  4. Any professional fundraiser contracts or amendments not yet provided?

Quality Checks

  • Values consistent across all tables and narrative; conflicts flagged [CONFLICT — VERIFY WITH COUNSEL]
  • Every gap marked [OPEN], [ASSUMED], or [TO BE CONFIRMED]
  • Deadline, fee, and extension verified from official source
  • Audit/review threshold applied correctly for revenue level
  • Oath language matches statutory requirements or flagged [VERIFY]
  • Fundraiser disclosures complete if professional fundraisers used
  • Attachments index cross-referenced against requirements matrix
  • Financial ratios computed correctly from stated figures
  • No fabricated filing rules, deadlines, fee tiers, or audit requirements

Guardrails

  • Use official state/legal sources only — never infer legal obligations
  • Reconcile or flag any cross-table inconsistencies
  • Preserve board/officer identities and compensation exactly as sourced
  • Include jurisdiction caveat when state rules vary by year or filing type
  • Mark uncertain legal statements [VERIFY]
  • Output requires attorney or compliance officer review before filing

Required disclaimer on every output:

THIS FILING PACKAGE REQUIRES INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF ALL DEADLINES, THRESHOLDS, AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS BY A QUALIFIED ATTORNEY OR CPA BEFORE SUBMISSION, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

中国大陆地区法院类案快速检索与《案件检索报告》(DOCX)生成技能。以案件五项要点(案由/法律关系、争议焦点、关键事实、我方诉请与诉讼地位、请求权基础法条)为检索锚点,经一次四问确认即开工(其中**检索地域范围**与**裁判时间范围**为强制选择题,默认范围为「2021年1月1日以后裁判的浙江省范围内的法院案例」,用户点选默认后须回显该范围提示);按**请求权基础、法律关系、案件事实三要素**判定高匹配——用户**指定**检索特定结果的案例时结果相似度计入评分(四要素满分 10 分),用户**未指定**时结果相似度不作为高匹配考虑因素(三要素满分 8 分);r1 判定须**核对法条版本与时间效力**,援引已失效旧法条者不得给满分;以语义向量检索为主召回、精确结构检索为条件兜底,本地脚本加权打分后按「得分率 > 法院层级 > 审判程序 > 裁判日期」排序,并检测**同院同日同标题的重复入库**案件、疑似重复者不占入报名额;截取匹配度最高的 5–10 例类案,逐案调详情核验案号并摘录判词原文,最后直接输出含页脚页码的 DOCX 报告(默认保存至桌面)。全流程人工确认 1 次、检索类调用控制在 2 次召回 + ≤10 次详情以内,报告阶段检索冻结。未指定结果时三要素高匹配而结果相反者亦会入报(逐例标注结果方向),指定结果时结果相反者一律剔除;报告内以两处固定声明披露「未设不利先例定向检索路径」的局限。当用户要求「快速检索类似案例」「找几个正向案例」「快速版案例检索报告」「检索 5 到 10 个类案并出报告」「出一份类案检索报告 docx」时使用。需要四象限归位、反向案例定向检索、补充召回多轮迭代或 14 分制硬软条件精判时,应使用完整版技能「案例检索报告Plus」而非本技能。基于华宇元典法律数据 MCP。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

88查企业风险查询与分析工具 —— 专注于中国大陆企业的法务风险查询与分析,覆盖经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法案件等风险类型。支持公司名称、统一社会信用代码、companyId 三种输入方式,自动完成风险查询并输出结构化风险分析总结。 触发场景:仅当用户意图为查询企业风险/法务风险时触发。包括但不限于:企业风险查询、公司风险、经营异常、行政处罚、监管措施、被执行人、失信被执行人、司法风险、风险扫描、风险评估、企业合规审查、风险报告、XX公司有什么风险、XX公司安全吗、XX公司有没有处罚、XX公司被执行过吗。 不触发场景:纯粹的企业信息查询(如查公司、搜企业、工商信息、注册资本、法人代表、股东结构、专利商标等)不应触发本技能,请使用其他 cha88 系列工具。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Manages Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative deposition workflows — drafting notice topics with reasonable particularity, building examination outlines, defending designees, handling objections, and preserving binding admissions for summary judgment or trial. Use when drafting or responding to 30(b)(6) notices, selecting and preparing designees, building topic-by-topic outlines, or triaging scope and privilege disputes. Trigger keywords: 30(b)(6), corporate representative deposition, topic list, designee, notice analysis, deposition objections, corporate admissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Guides taking and defending Rule 30(b)(6) corporate representative depositions. Drafts topic lists with reasonable particularity, builds examination outlines for binding corporate admissions, analyzes noticed topics for objections, and prepares designees. Use when drafting 30(b)(6) notices, preparing corporate deposition topics, selecting or preparing designees, or defending corporate representative depositions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification submissions demonstrating substantial equivalence under 21 CFR Part 807. Supports Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated pathways. Use when preparing Class II medical device regulatory filings, substantial equivalence analyses, or FDA premarket submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

Drafts a recordable Abstract of Judgment to create a judgment lien on a debtor's real property. Extracts party names, monetary components, and judgment details from case documents, then applies jurisdiction-specific formatting and certification requirements. Use post-judgment in commercial litigation when enforcing monetary awards, perfecting judgment liens, or preparing lien filings with the county recorder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CSlawyer1985/legal-skillhub152026年9月23日 更新

CSlawyer1985 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する