686 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generate or edit a source-grounded newsletter issue, digest, or briefing from provided or researched sources. Use for weekly/monthly updates, curated links, executive digests, community newsletters, or "turn these sources into a newsletter"; do not use for UI landing pages, marketing campaign design, unsourced news claims, or long-form research reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze source data, tables, CSV/XLSX extracts, metrics, or experiment results with explicit data-authenticity checks. Use for profiling, cleaning assumptions, statistical summaries, segmentation, trend analysis, or "analyze this data"; do not use for spreadsheet file surgery, chart design only, database migrations, or claims without data provenance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing a journal for a finished or nearly finished manuscript, when index status in Scopus, SSCI, ESCI, or TR Dizin must be confirmed, when a venue looks predatory, or when a cover letter needs drafting from the manuscript's actual claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a construct, scale, or key term crosses Turkish and English and conceptual equivalence must be audited: translation and back-translation, construct drift, and culturally bound meaning, before measurement or cross-cultural claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Claude Code session loops, drifts from scope, claims a fix that CI rejects, hits context, PATH, or permission walls, or fails in a way another retry will not solve and a root cause diagnosis is needed instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a research proposal needs work packages, milestones, deliverables, a timeline, a risk register, and budget-justification scaffolding, while keeping scientific claims and feasibility honest and human-owned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure persuasive speeches and formal arguments in forensic, legal, policy, and competitive debate styles. Use when the user needs to prepare talks, opening or closing arguments, policy pitches, public explanations, debate speeches, or mentions 'forensic speech', 'formal argument', 'persuasive speech structure', 'debate speech', 'opening statement', 'closing argument'. Turns structured claims into audience-tuned persuasive delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Threat-models protocols where authority, scarce resources, bonds, bounties, escrow, reputation, ordering, adjudication, or settlement create strategic incentives. Use to test attack utility, conservation, collusion, Sybil resistance, oracle capture, griefing, custody, liquidity, and residual risk. NOT for choosing payment or bond amounts without evidence, smart-contract code audit, legal or employment classification, DeFi trading, admitting workers, or settling claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze undirected cycle structure within a valid DAG using the source paper's orientation and contraction method. Use for cycle-basis analysis with explicit graph and reduction choices. NOT for directed feedback loops, workflow deadlocks, or runtime resilience claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs claim-evidence verification for agent outputs, recording supported, contradicted, or insufficient-evidence results alongside source accessibility. Activate on 'detect hallucination', 'fact check', 'verify claims', 'check accuracy', 'find fabrications'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan or audit the cross-layer Harbor cooperative editor: Loro replicas for humans and agents, governed edit claims, salvage authority, and transport across shared, LAN, and remote harbors. Use when a change spans editor collaboration, identity, recovery, or transport contracts. For a single GPUI pane use gpui-rust-console; for motion use rust-gpui-motion; for a shader use gpui-shaders. NOT for non-collaborative screens, web editors, or generic Rust development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits an Articles of Agreement contract — the daemon-witnessed agreement every official Port Daddy agent signs covering registration, transcript reporting, tool-use gating, file claims, parley conduct, budget limits, and operator control — against the enforcement-beats-hope bar: a clause counts as safe only when it resolves to a concrete, daemon-observable mechanism with a defined denial shape, never a promise the agent might honor. Use when drafting a new agent's Articles, reviewing a compliance-level (C0-C6) claim, deciding whether a clause is genuinely enforced or merely documented, or auditing whether an agent's claimed identity can be trusted. NOT for securing the inbound event-to-spawn path (fleet-event-spawn-trust), designing the relay's transport PKI and signing keys (pd-relay-zero-trust), or tracking an agent's identity and reputation across its whole lifetime after it signs (agent-identity-continuity-reputation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a normalized, machine-readable "work receipt" that answers what changed, why, by whom, and with what validation, for any AI-coding-agent task regardless of backend (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Aider, CI, or homegrown). Use when defining a receipt schema, normalizing heterogeneous agent logs into one evidence shape, gating PR merges on artifact-backed proof, or designing an OSS maintainer's fast-reject/fast-merge workflow. NOT for validating a DAG node's output against its own schema (use output-contract-enforcer), continuous runtime monitoring of a live coordination daemon (use runtime-verification-for-agents), or general Port Daddy claims/notes/salvage mechanics (use port-daddy-agent-skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture and systems design for agents that retain bounded state across sessions. Covers durable event history, owned state, derived memory, retrieval indexes, framework evaluation, recovery, deletion, and rebuild behavior. Uses constructed implementation examples and workload calibration rather than universal vendor, latency, similarity, retention, or cost claims. Activate on: "always-on agent", "persistent agent architecture", "episodic memory system", "agent memory design", "long-running agent", "stateful agent", "agent that remembers", "MemGPT architecture", "Letta deployment", "/always-on-agent-architecture". NOT for: choosing what data to feed the agent (use always-on-agent-inputs), brainstorming applications (use always-on-agent-applications), safety and privacy concerns (use always-on-agent-safety), general agentic patterns (use agentic-patterns).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。