「elf」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "build battle cards", "prep the sales team for launch", or "write the internal launch FAQ"; produces the internal enablement kit for a sales-led launch — battle cards vs each named alternative (where we win / where they win / trap questions, every fact traceable), a sales talk track derived from the PR-FAQ spine, an objection-handling table (objection → response → evidence), internal FAQ + CS macros, and an internal launch announcement with embargo discipline. Not for the external message house — use message-house-builder; not for competitor tracking itself — use competitor-tracker or competitor-analysis; not for outbound sequences — use cold-outbound-sequencer. 销售赋能/battle card/销售叙事/异议处理/内部FAQ

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "launch on Product Hunt / Hacker News", "prepare community or directory launch submissions", or "plan the launch submission waves"; produces per-platform submission packages — a Product Hunt tagline / gallery / first-comment skeleton, a factual Show HN title and text, per-subreddit posts with a self-promotion rules table, tiered directory waves, and a regional channel matrix including Chinese communities — plus a platform red-line check (never solicit votes or organize voting rings) and T-0 submission-status lines for the launch registry. Not for paid amplification — use content-amplifier; not for creator channels — use campaign-planner; not for launch telemetry readouts — use launch-monitor; not for ongoing community presence or pre-launch karma-building outside the launch window — use participation-warmup-planner. 社区发布/PH提交包/Show HN/目录波次/平台红线/中文渠道

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map our positioning", "name our competitive alternatives", or "pick a beachhead segment for the launch"; produces a Dunford-style positioning canvas — named competitive alternatives (including spreadsheet and status quo), unique attributes (verifiable, or routed to the claims ledger), value themes (attribute→benefit→value chains), a target beachhead segment scored on serviceability / pain intensity / reachability, and a one-sentence onlyness statement — the sole upstream of the message house and the entity-signal source for the canonical entity profile. Not for the message house or per-channel launch copy — use message-house-builder; not for audience/persona profiling itself — use audience-mapper; not for SEO keyword positioning — use keyword-research. 定位画布/竞争替代品/独特价值/滩头细分

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "check if our surfaces have drifted from the canon", "watch for competitor repositioning", or "define when we should reposition"; produces a drift report — self-drift per flagship surface vs the narrative-registry canon over time (via wayback.py, change history Measured with as-of dates), competitor-repositioning alerts, an explicit repositioning-trigger condition set, and a D1/W1/M1 message-shift retro (intended vs actual pull-through, evidence-labeled) — feeding the TALE L drift-audit sub-items and the narrative-whiplash guardrail fact base. Not for the first-time consistency check before a surface ships — use narrative-cascade-planner; not for computing the TALE profile result or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for echo-rate / AI-answer resonance measurement — use narrative-resonance-monitor. 自漂移监测/竞品重定位告警/重定位触发/叙事漂移复盘

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "watch my list health over time", "flag decaying / unengaged subscribers on a schedule", "why is my open rate drifting down / bounces creeping up", or "build me a re-permission and prune worklist"; runs the scheduled SEND list-decay + suppression-drift watch — an engagement-recency cohort read (30/90/180/365-day), hard-bounce and spam-complaint trend vs benchmark, suppression-list growth/leakage check, and a segmented re-permission / sunset / prune worklist tied to SEND S (list hygiene) and E (engagement-decay) sub-items. Not for the one-time pre-send authentication pre-flight — use deliverability-qa; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing the EQS or enforcing vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件列表健康度监控/退订漂移/沉睡用户清理

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a win-back campaign", "re-engage lapsed subscribers", "run a re-permission / re-consent sweep", or "sunset my dead list"; produces a closed-loop reactivation program — a lapsed-cohort definition, a staged offer ladder, a re-consent (re-permission) capture step, and a sunset-confirm / suppression rule. Owns none of the SEND-N sub-item notes: engagement-decay / sunset is email-sequence-designer's and preference-center / frequency options is preference-frequency-manager's — this skill references those notes, it does not re-emit them. Not for the general lifecycle flows (welcome/cart/post-purchase) — use email-sequence-designer; not for the preference-center / opt-down ladder — use preference-frequency-manager; not for the consent record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or the N1 veto — use email-quality-auditor. 流失召回/重新授权/沉默用户清理

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "grow my email list", "design a lead magnet / signup incentive", "set up double opt-in", or "plan a referral / recommendation loop"; produces a list-growth plan — acquisition channels, lead-magnet / incentive concepts, a compliant double-opt-in capture-flow spec, referral-loop mechanics, and subscriber-growth / cost-per-opt-in targets (labeled Estimated) — that feeds SEND-S (consent quality captured at acquisition) and SEND-N (lifecycle entry). Not for the signup page/popup UX itself — use landing-optimizer; not for recording the opt-in — use consent-registry; not for the confirmation-email copy — use email-creative-builder. 邮件列表增长/lead magnet/双重确认/推荐环

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a preference center", "set up a frequency opt-down ladder", "give people a step-down instead of unsubscribe", or "design a topic/cadence preference page"; produces a preference-center field spec, a frequency/topic opt-down ladder (down-tier paths that substitute for a hard unsubscribe), a preference-to-suppression mapping, and a SEND N-dimension sub-item note on preference-center / frequency options offered. Not for the lifecycle flow map or cadence governance — use email-sequence-designer; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or ruling the N1 unsubscribe veto — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件偏好中心/降频阶梯设计/退订替代降档

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when platform-reported conversions disagree with GA4/ecommerce, when you suspect Meta and Google are double-counting the same sales, or for a standing (monthly) reconciliation workbook that de-dups stacked credit against an order-ID truth set, normalizes attribution windows and currency, compares attribution models, and reads incrementality from a geo/holdout test. Not for the point-in-time R2 veto or RQS gate — use ad-account-auditor; not for the ROI/ROAS ratio math itself — use roi-calculator; not for organic dark-social share attribution or GA4 direct-traffic decomposition — use dark-social-attributor. 付费广告归因对账/去重/增量

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critique a rendered screen against mood.md, voice.md, and tokens.md. Use when those brand files exist and you are checking compliance. For defining the visual language itself, use `illustration-style` (ui-design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critique a rendered screen's typography — scale usage, readability, consistency, and token compliance. Use when reviewing type on a screen. For defining the scale itself, use `typography-scale` (ui-design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define what content a product needs, how it is structured, and who owns it. Use when content itself is the problem. For the words in the interface use `ux-writing` (designer-toolkit); for structural hierarchy use `information-architecture`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design the first-run experience — activation path, progressive disclosure, and time to first value. Use for a user's very first session. For the mechanics of the signup form itself, use `form-design`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan accessibility testing — assistive technologies, participant criteria, WCAG coverage, and session protocol. Use when scheduling testing with real AT users. Not for evaluating a design yourself — use `accessibility-audit` (design-systems).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select chart types and design data encodings — marks, axes, labels, and accessible chart styling. Use when presenting data graphically. Owns chart selection and encoding only; the categorical colour ramp itself belongs to `color-system`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design waiting experiences — spinners, skeletons, optimistic updates, and progressive reveal. Use when content takes time to arrive. For the latency budget itself use `doherty-threshold`; for success confirmation use `feedback-patterns`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read financials, map competitive landscapes, and argue design decisions in the language of value. Use when defending design to commercial stakeholders. For the live negotiation itself, use `design-negotiation` (designer-toolkit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advocate for design quality, scope, and timeline with partners and leadership using evidence and shared goals. Use in the conversation itself. For the commercial vocabulary behind it, use `business-design` (ux-strategy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-grow a pro-workflow wiki by running a budget-capped BFS research loop over pluggable source fetchers (web, arXiv, GitHub). Each iteration pops a seed from the queue, fetches sources, drafts a wiki page, dedupes claims against existing pages, enqueues follow-up seeds. Halts on budget cap, depth cap, or convergence. Use when the user says "research <topic>", "grow the <slug> wiki", "auto-research", or wants a knowledge base that builds itself overnight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SkillOpt-flavored offline training loop for any SKILL.md. Treats accumulated learn-rule corrections as training trajectories, proposes bounded patches via an optimizer LLM, gates each candidate against a held-out validation set built from the user's own past corrections, and ships only candidates that demonstrably improve the score. Inspired by Microsoft SkillOpt's ReflACT pipeline (rollout → reflect → aggregate → select → update → evaluate) adapted to pro-workflow's SQLite store. Use when a skill has accumulated 8+ learn-rule rows and the user wants the skill itself to get better, not just longer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a self-contained HTML viewer for a pro-workflow wiki. Pages, sources, claims, seed queue, page-link graph and full-text search all in one file. No external dependencies, no JS framework, S3-uploadable. Use when the user wants to browse a wiki visually, share its current state with someone, audit research progress, or hand off a knowledge base. Inspired by Thariq Shihipar's "Unreasonable Effectiveness of HTML" — favors information density and shareability over markdown-only outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up or fix the Vexa MCP connection for this plugin — where the API key comes from, hosted vs self-hosted URL, and how to check the connection. Use when the vexa server is missing, returns 401, or the user asks how to connect Vexa.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for AI-agent work on AWS: pick a runtime, plan a migration for existing workloads, and build an executable POC — one phased flow. Triggers on: which runtime for my agent, AgentCore vs ECS vs EKS vs Lambda, AgentCore vs Lambda MicroVMs, deploy an AI agent on AWS, agent architecture on AWS, I have an agent idea what do I build, move/migrate my agents to AWS, agent migration plan, add AgentCore services (memory, gateway, identity, policy, observability) to an agent already on AWS, Temporal on AWS (migrate/run Temporal workers on AWS, a service orchestrated by Temporal, Temporal Cloud vs self-hosted). Temporal Workflow code is never rewritten into Step Functions. Requires at least one agentic component — a purely non-agent system (plain services, batch jobs, HTTP endpoints, non-agent Temporal Activities) is out of scope, redirected to gcp-to-aws / heroku-to-aws / llm-to-bedrock. Not for: compute/data migration with no AI agent; pure LLM SDK rewrite (use llm-to-bedrock); per-model pricing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when your agent or environment is broken — wrong answers, errors, timeouts, tool failures, or CLI issues. Reads traces and logs to diagnose root causes. Also checks prerequisites when the CLI itself isn't working. Triggers on: "agent not working", "wrong answer", "agent error", "tool call failing", "debug agent", "check logs", "read traces", "broken", "500 error", "424 error", "model access denied", "command not found", "stuck in DELETING", "maxVms exceeded", "cold start diagnosis", "cold start slow", "agentcore create error", "create failed", "exit code 7", "connection refused local dev". Not for deploy failures — use agents-deploy. Not for performance tuning without errors — use agents-optimize. Not for VPC configuration — use agents-build. Not for observability setup or missing logs — use agents-optimize.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。