「how to use」の検索結果

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when testing, evaluating, or building regression suites for Agentforce agents: conversation testing in Agent Builder, topic (now subagent) coverage and utterance testing, Testing API and AiEvaluationDefinition metadata, Agentforce DX CLI test runs (sf agent generate test-spec, sf agent test create/run/resume/results/list), evaluation metrics (containment rate, escalation rate, CSAT, topic activation accuracy), and post-deploy analytics via Enhanced Event Logs. Triggers: 'how do I test my Agentforce agent', 'agent routes to wrong subagent', 'write utterance tests', 'regression test after topic change', 'measure agent quality', 'agent containment rate', 'run agent tests from the CLI'. NOT for agent creation, topic design, or action contract design — use agentforce/agentforce-agent-creation, agentforce/agent-topic-design, or agentforce/agent-actions respectively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up, customizing, or troubleshooting the Salesforce Path component on Opportunity, Lead, Case, or custom objects. Triggers: 'add guidance to stages', 'key fields on path', 'celebrate closed won', 'path not showing', 'configure path steps', 'confetti on stage change'. NOT for creating the stage picklist — use admin/opportunity-management. NOT for in-app prompts — use admin/in-app-guidance-and-walkthroughs. Metadata: PathAssistant, PathAssistantStep, PathAssistantSettings, pathAssistantEnabled, canOverrideAutoPathCollapseWithUserPref, runtime_sales_pathassistant:pathAssistant, picklistValueName, recordTypeName, BusinessProcess.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Lightning record page, home page, or app page is slow to load or render — covers Experienced Page Time (EPT) analysis, component count reduction, progressive disclosure via tabs and conditional rendering, Lightning Experience Insights diagnostics, and DOM/XHR minimization strategies. Triggers: 'Lightning page is slow', 'EPT is high', 'record page takes too long to load', 'too many components on page', 'Lightning Experience Insights shows slow page', 'how to optimize Lightning page performance'. NOT for Visualforce page performance (separate concern). NOT for Apex or SOQL query optimization (use apex/apex-cpu-and-heap-optimization or data/soql-query-optimization). NOT for report or dashboard performance (use admin/report-performance-tuning).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to use the coding agents installed on this machine (claude, codex, droid, grok, vktr, hermes, opencode, copilot, pi) as plain sub-agents in orchestrated workflows: one headless invocation, one prompt in, one result out. Deliberately ignores each CLI's own orchestration features (droid --mission, codex multi_agent, hermes delegation/moa/kanban, grok --agents, opencode personas). The orchestrator is whatever session is running the skill; the CLIs are interchangeable workers. Use when the user asks "which agent should run this", "fan out workers", "run X headless", or when a lifeos skill (overnight, timeboxed-iterating, workgraph, gauntlet, bughunt, dark-factory) needs to launch an agent CLI, or when a worker needs company context it should ask Viktor for (vktr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate a persistent visible-reasoning mode that requires detailed internalcot CLI notes before substantive tools and answers, throughout the conversation. Use only when the user explicitly invokes $internalcot, says "internalcot on", or asks to enable internalcot mode. Keep it active until the user explicitly turns it off. Do not trigger merely because a user asks to think carefully, reason deeply, or show work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive completed plans. Moves finished folder plans from .unikit/code/plans/<folder>/ to .unikit/code/archive/plans/<folder>/, so plan lookup and the plan lists stop offering them; an unfinished plan moves only when the user picks it, and is marked as unfinished. Lists every plan with its created and last-change dates; plans can be picked by number or by date. Never deletes, renames or commits. Use when user says "archive plans", "archive completed", "archive old plans", "clean up plans", or "show archived plans". Not for .unikit/code/PLAN.md or FIX_PLAN.md; to check that a plan is really done use /unikit-verify, to commit the move use /unikit-commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user gives a SaaS product's landing page URL, homepage, or name and asks for a full teardown or deep-dive of how the product works across web, desktop, and mobile — including per-platform feature inventories and user journeys, tech stack, pricing/plan mapping, how the platforms integrate and sync (and the business logic behind those choices), hardware integrations, business-scale/revenue signals, and concrete release artifacts per platform — with a structured Markdown report as the deliverable. Trigger on phrases like "research this SaaS", "do a platform teardown of X", "map every feature of this product across web/mobile/desktop", "reverse-engineer how this app works everywhere", or a bare URL plus a request to understand the whole product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building a frontend and the user wants a distinctive / animated / "wow" UI element in React + Tailwind - e.g. a laptop-opening-on-scroll, 3D tilt card, spotlight hero, animated beams/background, marquee, bento grid, interactive globe, meteor/particle background, shimmer button, or scroll/reveal motion. Fetches the showpiece component LIVE at build time from code libraries (Aceternity, Magic UI, Cult UI, ReactBits, 21st.dev) via their shadcn registry command (or WebFetch fallback), then adapts it to brand tokens. Also covers plain components (button, form, modal, table, etc.) as a fallback. Triggers on "make it pop", "something flashy", "animated [X]", "like [cool site]", "build a [showpiece] section". NOT for non-React stacks. Inspiration galleries (Dribbble/godly) are visual reference only - never code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Root-causes one specific mistake the agent just made, such as not committing despite instructions to, by checking it against the loaded AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, skills, and Beads memories, delegating the investigation to a separate agent where the harness supports one; proposes concrete context improvements, and lets the user choose which to apply and how to remediate. Use when the user invokes `/learn` or `$learn`, with or without a description of the mistake, including `/learn /qs`-style shorthand naming the corrective command. For a broad end-of-session documentation sweep, use `documentation-updates` (`/reflect`) instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces an attorney-ready memo from a corpus of legal documents supplied by the user. Use when a user shows up with a folder, zip, or vault of case documents and asks for a case summary, case evaluation, litigation package, intake memo, matter overview, or "can you summarize this case for me." The skill ingests the corpus into a searchable index, OCRs anything non-searchable, inventories and diagnoses the practice area, loads the appropriate practice-area playbook module(s) (PI/tort, commercial litigation, IP infringement, or user-authored extensions), iteratively searches the corpus across eight core dimensions plus any module-specific dimensions, defers specialized document clusters (depositions, medical records, discovery, liens) to dedicated sibling skills, and synthesizes a cited memo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs human-in-the-loop review points for DAG workflows. Determines what to present to the human, how to collect feedback, and how to route approve/reject/modify decisions back into the DAG. Use when adding approval gates, designing review UX, or handling human feedback in agent workflows. Activate on "human review", "approval gate", "human-in-the-loop", "human gate", "approval workflow", "user review step". NOT for executing human gates at runtime (use dag-runtime with Temporal signals), general UX design, or chatbot conversation design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data structures and algorithms for AI agent episodic memory. Covers vector stores (HNSW, IVF, PQ), temporal indexing, knowledge graphs with triple stores, hierarchical summarization, forgetting curves, working/long-term/ procedural memory, and memory consolidation. Deep analysis of MemGPT/Letta, Zep/Graphiti, Mem0, and the Stanford generative agents memory architecture. Teaches the CS fundamentals behind how agents remember, retrieve, and forget. Activate on: "agent memory", "episodic memory", "vector search algorithm", "HNSW", "memory retrieval", "forgetting curve", "knowledge graph memory", "MemGPT", "Letta", "Zep", "Mem0", "memory consolidation", "temporal retrieval", "agent long-term memory", "memory layer". NOT for: conversation protocol design (use agent-conversation-protocols), agent infrastructure selection (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), building RAG pipelines (use ai-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to design contextual inputs for an always-on AI agent with episodic memory. Covers what data to feed the agent, how to structure observations and triggers, ambient context capture (screen, audio, calendar), context window budgeting, and retrieval strategies that keep the agent grounded in what's actually happening. Activate on: "what should the agent observe", "context inputs for agent", "ambient context capture", "agent triggers", "agent input design", "screenpipe integration", "context window budget", "what data to feed my agent", "/always-on-agent-inputs". NOT for: memory architecture and storage (use always-on-agent-architecture), application ideas (use always-on-agent-applications), safety concerns (use always-on-agent-safety).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and adopt production AI agent infrastructure in 2026. Covers framework selection (LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, MCP), orchestration patterns, evaluation, observability, memory systems, and tool use. Also covers the SOCIAL dimension: how to sell agent infrastructure internally, change management, measuring ROI, building trust in autonomous systems, and scaling adoption across teams. Activate on: "agent infrastructure", "agent framework comparison", "which agent framework", "sell AI tools internally", "agent adoption", "agent observability", "agent evaluation", "MCP architecture", "agentic mesh", "enterprise AI agents", "AI change management", "agent ROI". NOT for: building specific agents (use ai-engineer), designing agent behavior patterns (use agentic-patterns), prompt tuning (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide pump setting adjustments for the MiniMed 780G system based on CareLink data, using Medtronic's 3-step follow-up workflow. Use when a clinician has CareLink data for a 780G patient and wants to know what to change — which setting, by how much, and how to program it. Triggers include: "what do I adjust", "how to fix high TIR", "how to reduce hypos", "adjust ICR/ISF/basal", "SmartGuard settings", "780G pump settings review", or any question about optimising 780G therapy after reviewing a download.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a codebase and recommend Claude Code automations (hooks, subagents, skills, plugins, MCP servers). Use when user asks for automation recommendations, wants to optimize their Claude Code setup, mentions improving Claude Code workflows, asks how to first set up Claude Code for a project, or wants to know what Claude Code features they should use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map Delphi classes to a relational database using TMS Aurelius ORM attributes. Use when the user asks to create entity classes, add Aurelius mapping to existing classes, fix or review mapping attributes, explain how a class is mapped, or work with associations, inheritance, automapping, nullable fields, blobs, or composite identifiers. Triggers on requests like "create Aurelius entities for...", "map this class to Aurelius", "add ORM mapping", "fix the mapping on this class", "how do I map a one-to-many in Aurelius".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save, load, update, delete, merge, and navigate entity objects using TMS Aurelius ORM (TObjectManager). Use when the user asks how to persist or retrieve data with Aurelius, manage object lifetime, work with associations or collections at runtime, handle transactions, use cached updates, or control concurrency. Does NOT cover query DSL or criteria/projections (those are in a separate skill). Triggers on requests like "save an entity with Aurelius", "load a customer from the database", "add items to a collection", "how do I update an object", "flush changes", "delete a record with Aurelius", "merge a transient object", "how do transactions work in Aurelius", "batch updates Aurelius".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and install specialized agent skills from the open ecosystem. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks 'how do I do X', 'find a skill for X', 'is there a skill for X', wants to extend agent capabilities, or needs help with a specific domain (design, testing, deployment, etc.). Make sure to use this skill whenever the user mentions skills, plugins, extensions, tools, or wants to find new capabilities for the agent. Integrates with the Skills CLI and skills.sh directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The router for how a change legally happens in this repo — which sign-off gate fires for which kind of change, what counts as approval, how the packages-edit guard works, and how work is allowed to reach main. Use when starting ANY change and unsure which rules apply, when an Edit to packages/* gets BLOCKED, when a pipeline issue sits on status:blocked and you need to know what unblocks it, or when asked "do I need sign-off for this", "how do I get this merged", "can I deploy this", "who approves X", "why won't my approval label/reaction do anything".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare your data to a partner's data in the marketplace. Given a dataset you already own with person/edge data, this skill walks you through picking a partner data source to match against, choosing which identifier types to match on, optionally selecting which enrichment attributes to attach, and then submits the report — returning overlap, match counts, and demographic coverage. Use when: "how does my data compare to your marketplace", "compare my data to [partner]", "how much overlap do I have with [supplier]", "run a match report", "match my customers against 3P data", "see what enrichment is available for my dataset", or any open-ended question about marketplace overlap. (narrative-identity)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the GAO Agile Assessment Guide (GAO-24-105506, 2023). Use for assessing and managing Agile software development in federal programs: the Agile Manifesto and framework family (Scrum, Kanban, XP, SAFe, DA, DSDM, Lean, DevOps); the three adoption perspectives (team dynamics, program operations, organization environment); requirements decomposition (epics, features, user stories, INVEST, MoSCoW, definition of done); Agile-aware federal contracting (FAR, modular contracting, SOO/PWS/SOW, product owner vs. COR); program monitoring and control (WBS, cost, schedule, EVM at the feature level); Agile metrics (velocity, lead/cycle time, CFD, burn charts); and the auditor's key-question bank. Oversight- and acquisition-oriented: it tells you how to *assess and govern* Agile programs, not how to code. Thin on hands-on engineering practice, deep cost/schedule checklists (see gao-cost, gao-schedule), and any non-US-federal context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns sustainability or ESG reports the user provides into a DRAFT question pack for reviewers: every quantitative disclosure as stated with unit, period, boundary and page, year-over-year changes computed only from the stated figures with the arithmetic shown, targets with stated and computed progress, restatements and inconsistencies, gaps and specific questions to the report owner. No assurance, accuracy or conformance verdict. Use when the user asks to "prepare review questions on our sustainability report", "what changed year on year in this ESG report", "check the figures in this report before it goes to the board", "find the gaps in this ESG disclosure" or "build a question pack for the report owner". Do not use for reviewing marketing text against environmental-claim rules, use green-claims-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。