8,372 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to define their ideal customer profile, position an AI product, build messaging architecture, or validate product-market fit. Also use when the user mentions 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' 'positioning,' 'PMF,' 'product-market fit,' 'messaging,' 'buyer persona,' 'enrichment signals,' 'market positioning,' or 'competitive positioning.' This skill covers market positioning, ICP definition, messaging architecture, and PMF validation for AI-native products. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert Mermaid diagram creation, validation, and rendering with dual-engine output (SVG/PNG/ASCII). Supports all 20+ diagram types including C4 architecture, AWS architecture-beta with service icons, flowcharts, sequence, ERD, state, class, mindmap, timeline, git graph, sankey, and more. Features code-to-diagram analysis, batch rendering, 15+ themes, and syntax validation. Use when users ask to create diagrams, visualize architecture, render mermaid files, generate ASCII diagrams, document system flows, model databases, draw AWS infrastructure, analyze code structure, or anything involving "mermaid", "diagram", "flowchart", "architecture diagram", "sequence diagram", "ERD", "C4", "ASCII diagram". Do NOT use for non-Mermaid image generation, data plotting with chart libraries, or general documentation writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete browser automation with Playwright. Auto-detects dev servers, writes clean test scripts to /tmp. Test pages, fill forms, take screenshots, check responsive design, validate UX, test login flows, check links, automate any browser task. Use when user wants to test websites, automate browser interactions, validate web functionality, or perform any browser-based testing. Do NOT use for quick page debugging or network inspection (use chrome-devtools instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects anemic domain models, validates and refactors them into rich domain models, and enforces tactical DDD patterns (Entities, Value Objects, Aggregates, Domain Services, Domain Events). Use when the user asks to validate, review, or check domain models or DDD code; detect anemia; refactor domain objects; improve encapsulation; or mentions terms like "anemic model", "rich domain", "aggregate", "value object", "domain event", "ubiquitous language", "is this good DDD", "does this follow DDD", or "check my domain". Do NOT use for module or service boundary design, architectural decomposition, strategic DDD context mapping, or code outside the domain layer (DTOs, controllers, infrastructure adapters).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finds duplicate business logic spread across multiple components and suggests consolidation. Use when asking "where is this logic duplicated?", "find common code between services", "what can be consolidated?", "detect shared domain logic", or analyzing component overlap before refactoring. Do NOT use for code-level duplication detection (use linters) or dependency analysis (use coupling-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, repair, validate, or package a reusable iPollo Video template in an active HyperFrames template-authoring session. Use for video template structure, editable variables, reusable scenes, GSAP motion, component reuse, cover metadata, and save-ready validation; do not use for ordinary one-off video edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
create a fraimz, make fraimz, prove it works, frame proof, PR proof, validate experience, e2e evidence, fraimz.html. The full fraimz loop — frame the claim, drive the real app via CDP, validate/repair, output fraimz.html. Use whenever a task ends with "please create a fraimz" or any change needs end-to-end proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
frame proof, HTML frames, screenshots, recording, PR proof, e2e evidence, validate visually. Daytona artifacts workflow for validated screenshots and optional videos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register AI agents on-chain using the ERC-8004 Trustless Agents standard. Manage agent identity as NFTs, build reputation through feedback, and request third-party validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for using n8n-mcp MCP tools effectively. Use when searching for nodes, validating configurations, accessing templates, managing workflows, organizing workflows into folders, managing credentials, auditing instance security, or using any n8n-mcp tool. Provides tool selection guidance, parameter formats, and common patterns. IMPORTANT — Always consult this skill before calling any n8n-mcp tool — it prevents common mistakes like wrong nodeType formats, incorrect parameter structures, and inefficient tool usage. If the user mentions n8n, workflows, nodes, or automation and you have n8n MCP tools available, use this skill first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when a developer explicitly asks to clean, prune, tidy, or organize DeepChat SDD documentation after implementation and validation. Scans docs/features, docs/issues, and docs/architecture; prefers multi-agent review when available; removes completed issue docs when a linked GitHub issue is closed or implementation and validation evidence proves the bug no longer exists, drops stale plans and legacy task files from completed feature or architecture goals, and deletes obsolete feature or architecture docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Darwin Skill 2.0 (达尔文.skill 2.0): autonomous skill optimizer, v2.0 integrates Microsoft Research SkillLens (arXiv 2605.23899) 9-dim rubric + SkillOpt (arXiv 2605.23904) validation-gated design + human-in-the-loop checkpoints. Evaluates SKILL.md files using a 9-dimension rubric (structure + effectiveness + meta-skill blacklists), runs hill-climbing with git version control, spawns independent judge agents for blind evaluation, validates improvements through test prompts with auto-break on diminishing returns, and generates visual result cards. Use when user mentions "优化skill", "skill评分", "自动优化", "auto optimize", "skill质量检查", "达尔文", "darwin", "帮我改改skill", "skill怎么样", "提升skill质量", "skill review", "skill打分".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2-layer plan validation: instant structural checks + trigger-based specialist agents. Auto-fixes issues using ADRs and first principles. Every issue must be resolved before execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Template for commands that implement a structured recipe: validate preconditions, then execute numbered steps. Fork this and replace the placeholder content. The 'Context Validation Checkpoints' section is the key pattern, forcing Claude to verify preconditions before starting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates the complete planning pipeline: product direction (ceo-review) -> architecture (eng-review) -> implementation plan (start) -> validation (validate) -> execution (execute). Run stages individually or let the orchestrator coordinate the full flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Formik form handling with validation patterns. Use when building forms, implementing validation, or handling form submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a hook", "add a PreToolUse/PostToolUse/Stop hook", "validate tool use", "implement prompt-based hooks", "use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}", "set up event-driven automation", "block dangerous commands", or mentions hook events (PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, SubagentStop, SessionStart, SessionEnd, UserPromptSubmit, PreCompact, Notification). Provides comprehensive guidance for creating and implementing Claude Code plugin hooks with focus on advanced prompt-based hooks API.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill provides reference guidance for citation verification in academic writing. Use when the user asks about "citation verification best practices", "how to verify references", "preventing fake citations", or needs guidance on citation accuracy. This skill supports ml-paper-writing by providing detailed verification principles and common error patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffolds new agent skills for the dotnet/skills repository. Use when creating a new skill, generating SKILL.md files, writing a skill description that the runtime will actually route to, or setting up skill directory structures. Handles frontmatter generation, section templates, and validation guidance. Do not use for fixing a skill that already fails its evaluation (use improve-skill-quality) or for writing eval.yaml (use create-skill-test).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies cross-parameter default rules when creating .NET projects with dotnet new, filling gaps consistently without overriding values the user set explicitly. USE FOR: choosing which target framework to pair with native AOT, deciding whether to keep HTTPS when authentication is enabled, recognizing that controllers and minimal-API flags are mutually exclusive, filling unset related parameters during project creation, explaining why a default was applied and ensuring an explicit user value is never overridden. DO NOT USE FOR: creating the project itself (use template-instantiation), finding or comparing templates (use template-discovery and template-comparison), authoring or validating custom templates (use template-authoring and template-validation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares two or more dotnet new templates side by side to help users choose between them based on parameters, feature support, frameworks, and classifications. USE FOR: deciding between similar templates (webapi vs webapp, blazor vs blazorwasm, console vs worker), producing a side-by-side comparison of parameters and feature support, understanding how templates differ before creating a project. DO NOT USE FOR: creating a project from a template (use template-instantiation), authoring or validating custom templates (use template-authoring and template-validation), general single-template discovery (use template-discovery).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and validate claims using counter-hypothesis testing. Use when verifying technical content, checking references, validating API endpoints, or performing quality assurance on deliverables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Defensive CI/CD patterns: semver validation, token checks, retry logic, draft detection — earned from v0.8.22
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。