「rev」の検索結果

Reviews one SKILL.md against the format rules and returns a findings table: strict YAML front matter with exactly name and description, name equal to the folder, description as the trigger, the eight-heading skeleton, capability-neutral wording, safety boundaries. Each finding carries severity, rule identifier, location, quoted evidence and replacement text; the verdict READY, REVISE or BLOCKED is an apparent state and the owner decides. Use when the user asks to "review this SKILL.md", "check my skill file before upload", "lint this skill description", "validate the front matter of this skill" or "score this skill folder". Do not use to write an agent's instructions field, use agent-instructions-drafter instead; for injection or leakage exposures use agent-instructions-red-team; for launch tests use agent-evaluation-plan. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads an accounts payable exception list (mismatches, possible duplicates, missing or exhausted purchase orders, missing receipts, vendor or bank detail differences) with any invoice, purchase order and receipt data supplied, and returns a DRAFT action sheet: per line, the exception as stated, the facts as read, the difference where both sides exist, one proposed next action for the accounts payable clerk to perform, who or what it needs, and a draft query, with UNKNOWN wherever the data is silent. Use when the user asks to "review these invoice exceptions", "work through the AP exception queue", "what should I do with these blocked invoices", "propose next steps for the three-way match failures" or "sort out the duplicate and missing PO invoices". Do not use for a purchase order log screened for anomalies, use purchase-order-anomaly-review instead; for an expense claim against policy, use expense-policy-precheck. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-checks one expense claim or travel plan, line by line, against the expense or travel policy the user supplies, and returns a DRAFT precheck sheet: the policy clause matched to each line, the limit quoted as the policy states it, whether the amount sits within, at or outside that limit, missing receipts, pre-approvals or justifications, and neutral questions for the approver and the claimant, with UNKNOWN wherever the policy or the claim is silent. Use when the user asks to "check this expense claim against policy", "pre-check my travel request", "is this claim within policy", "review these expenses before I submit them", "what receipts or approvals are missing" or "prepare the approver's questions for this claim". Do not use for a purchase order log or spend extract, use purchase-order-anomaly-review instead; do not use to compare a policy against a standard or regulation, use policy-gap-review instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open the alpha review screen to mark judge keepers as gold or miss, read per-miner precision, and print the eval state. Use when tuning a miner's accuracy. Thin launcher over the existing harvest engine and local review server. Triggers: "/alpha-review", "alpha screen", "open the review screen".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Daily wisdom review applying Charlie Munger's mental models to your work and thinking. Use when asked to review decisions, analyze thinking patterns, detect biases, apply mental models, do a "Munger review", or run the Munger Observer. Triggers on scheduled daily reviews or manual requests like "run munger observer", "review my thinking", "check for blind spots", or "apply mental models".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

既存のレビュー結果 (review-self / review-external) を再点検し、漏れ・誤検知・ハルシネーション・根拠欠落を検出する W チェック skill

.river-review.{yaml,json} の context.budget / ranking / reviewMode 設定をモデル仕様とリポジトリ規模に合わせて調整するレビュー観点。

Checks whether AI-assisted work defines review criteria, accessible context, explicit review loop, human judgment boundary, and feedback capture before delegating to an agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a second opinion or independent review from Codex (OpenAI) via the local Codex CLI. Use when the user wants Codex to review a design memo, PR, diff, or decision, or to cross-check an approach from another model. Also trigger on "Codexに聞いて", "Codexと相談", "Codexにレビュー", "Codexの意見", "別のモデルで確認".

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Crucible — atlassian Crucible code review management including review creation, commenting workflows, approval processes, and Jira integration. Use when managing Crucible review workflows, configuring review templates, and enforcing review completion policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Coderabbit — codeRabbit AI code review management including automated review comments, auto-suggestions, review customization, and learning from feedback. Use when configuring CodeRabbit for AI-assisted code review, custom review rules, and automated suggestion workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Bitbucket Pr Reviews — bitbucket pull request review management including default reviewers, merge checks, branch permissions, and build status integration. Use when configuring or automating Bitbucket PR review workflows across repositories and workspaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes - Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when someone asks to write, rewrite, review, or improve text that appears inside a product or interface. Examples: "review the UX copy", "is there a better way to phrase this", "rewrite this error message", "write copy for this screen/flow/page", reviewing button labels, improving CLI output messages, writing onboarding copy, settings descriptions, or confirmation dialogs. Trigger whenever the request involves wording shown to end users inside software — apps, web, CLI, email notifications, modals, tooltips, empty states, or alerts. Also trigger for vague requests like "review the UX" where interface copy review is implied. Do NOT trigger for content marketing, blog posts, app store listings, API docs, brand guides, cover letters, or interview questions — this is a technical writing skill for interface language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hostile self-review of recently written AI workflow code that then applies fixes (agents, tools, chat context, summarization, tokens, attachments). Use after generating AI systems code, or when asked to self-review and harden it. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate attacks (adversarial-challenge). Prefer: adversarial-challenge → decide → this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Devil's-advocate attack on AI workflow designs — threat model, assumption challenges, code critiques, and hypothetical redesigns with no file edits. Use for "attack this design", devil's advocate, or hostile challenge on agents/tools/summarization/tokens. Not for PR peer review (code-review) or self-review that applies fixes (ai-systems-review). Prefer: this skill → decide → ai-systems-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interacts with live Hunk diff review sessions via CLI. Inspects review focus, navigates files, hunks, and exact lines, reloads session contents, adds inline review comments, and paints attention marks on character ranges. Use when the user has a Hunk session running or wants to review diffs interactively.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the screens, UX, wording, feedback after actions, accessibility, or layout of frontend/ come up, even without the word "review" — delegates to the frontend-ux-reviewer agent, which runs the dev screens against the Lean CLI with Playwright and reports with evidence. Not for reviewing the domain model itself (that is the ddd skill's review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SwiftUI プレビュー・Swift REPL・Apple ドキュメント検索。Xcode ネイティブ MCP 経由でのみ利用可能。「preview」「SwiftUI preview」「プレビュー」「REPL」「playground」「Swift 実行」「Apple docs」「ドキュメント検索」などのキーワードで自動適用。

コード変更のセルフレビューを実施する。Triggers on: '/self-review', 'セルフレビュー', 'self-review', 'コードレビューして'

Check Pull Request on current branch, and obtain unresolved review comments. `gh` command is required. Use this when user instructed with `PR review comment` `PR レビューコメント` etc.