378 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
機械学習のない既存アプリに、推薦・分類・予測などを追加するための手順を整理します。課題とデータの確認から、最初のモデルの学習・評価・組み込みまでを支援します。
技術や設計を選んだ理由を、背景・比較案・影響とともにMarkdownへ記録するスキル。連番と索引で整理し、既存の記録から過去の判断理由も確認します。
Angularの画面やサービスを作り、状態管理・フォーム・画面遷移の設計を支援します。使用バージョンに合わせて実装方針を選び、テストやビルド確認まで扱います。
Cluster a GitHub issue backlog by root cause into a small set of plan-master issues, redirect children with a standardized comment, and bundle architectural-fix PRs that close clusters atomically. Use when an issue tracker has accumulated dozens of reports that share underlying defects, when asked to triage / consolidate / cluster / dedupe issues, when asked to build a plan series or roadmap from open issues, or when routing a new incoming bug into an existing plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SPARC development workflow (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion). Use when: new features, complex implementations, architectural changes. Skip when: simple fixes, documentation, configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ADR-152 — weighted similarity between two harness fingerprints (genome + score JSON). Returns overall score in [0,1] plus per-component breakdown (cosine over 9 numerics, categorical agreement over 4 enums, jaccard over agent_topology). Unblocks ADR-151 §3.2 Recommender, §3.3 Drift Detection, §3.5 Plugin Compat. Pure-TS, no `@metaharness/*` dep — preserves ADR-150's four architectural constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
5-dimension harness readiness scorecard from `metaharness score {path}`. Returns harnessFit / compileConfidence / taskCoverage / toolSafety / memoryUsefulness + estCostPerRunUsd + scaffoldReady. Pure-read; subprocess invocation; degrades gracefully when MetaHarness is absent (ADR-150 architectural constraint).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run `@metaharness/darwin evolve {repo}` to mutate a harness's seven policy surfaces (planner/contextBuilder/reviewer/retryPolicy/toolPolicy/memoryPolicy/scorePolicy), sandbox-score each variant, and promote only measured wins. The model is frozen; the harness evolves. Closes the loop ADR-150 opens (score+genome describe; evolve changes). Degrades gracefully when @metaharness/darwin is absent (ADR-150 + ADR-153 architectural constraints).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold a custom AI agent harness via `metaharness new {name} --template {id} --host {id}`. Defaults to DRY-RUN (no writes) unless --confirm is passed. Refuses to write to the calling repo root or anywhere inside it. Honors ADR-150 architectural constraint + ruflo's "destructive-action confirmation" pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review repository architecture using Ontoly Software Graph and MCP capabilities. Use when asked to explain architecture, module boundaries, package topology, service ownership, or architectural risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authors a Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain Management Solution Blueprint from scratch through a structured, section-by-section architect interview, establishing scope, target operating model, application and data architecture, integration landscape, migration strategy, security model, ALM, testing, deployment, and support approach, with a decision log capturing rationale and rejected alternatives. Use when the user wants to create D365 implementation architecture documentation, start a D365 implementation, design the architecture, prepare a Solution Blueprint, or identify the architectural decisions the programme must make. Do not use for critique of an existing design; that is a review task rather than blueprint authoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design AI agent architectures through requirements discovery, or audit and diagnose architectural flaws in existing agents. Architecture only; excludes implementation and general code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code review through the lens of real engineers' documented philosophies (Torvalds, Thompson, Carmack, Kent Beck, Jobs, Cagan). Complements abstract-role adversarial review with named, sourced perspectives. Use when automated review findings feel generic, when a PR has architectural or UX impact, or when the author wants pre-submit hardening beyond standard checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn GDDs plus architecture into epics — one per architectural module, with untraced requirements. Then /create-stories [epic-slug].
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A GDD changed — scan ADRs and the traceability index for now-stale architectural decisions. Impact report, guides resolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural code review — coding standards, SOLID, testability, performance concerns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a PR against the Pascal architectural rules — package boundaries (core/viewer/editor/nodes), the registry-driven composition model (def.geometry / def.renderer / def.system), legacy-dispatch regressions, the slots + world-scale-UV convention for new nodes/geometry, hook hygiene (useEditor/useScene/useViewer), and selector performance. Use when the user asks to review a PR, audit a branch, or check that changes respect the codebase's architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proven workflow architectural patterns from real n8n workflows. Use when building new workflows, designing workflow structure, choosing workflow patterns, planning workflow architecture, or asking about webhook processing, HTTP API integration, database operations, AI agent workflows, batch processing, or scheduled tasks. Always consult this skill when the user asks to create, build, or design an n8n workflow, automate a process, or connect services — even if they don't explicitly mention 'patterns'. Covers webhook, API, database, AI, batch processing, and scheduled automation architectures. Also use when optimizing a slow workflow or speeding up large-item-count processing (node count, batchSize, all-items vs per-item).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing changed or staged code, a branch, or a PR in the Handsontable monorepo across architecture, code quality, performance, accessibility, and tests. Covers SOLID / Law of Demeter / plugin decoupling / breaking-changes policy, custom ESLint rules / JSDoc / naming / cognitive complexity, large-array and render-batching performance, WCAG 2.1 AA + keyboard navigation, and the tests a change ships (a named exercising test per new path, scoped mutation, a ticket on every weakened assertion). Trigger when asked to review changes, check a diff against Handsontable conventions, assess architectural correctness, spot performance regressions, verify accessibility, or judge whether a change's tests prove it, and as the design lens before or while implementing any core change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。