「aris」の検索結果

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares the performance of two or more audience segments across key metrics side by side. Use this skill when someone wants to compare audiences, cohorts, or groups — for example, "how do mobile users compare to desktop users on conversion," "compare new vs. returning visitors," "show me the difference between these two segments," "compare these audiences on our KPIs," or "which segment performs better." Also trigger for "segment comparison," "audience comparison," or "cohort comparison."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. Covers "X vs Y" layouts, "alternatives to X" pages, feature matrices, schema markup, and conversion optimization. Use when user says "comparison page", "vs page", "alternatives page", "competitor comparison", "X vs Y", "versus", "compare competitors", or "alternative to".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares the performance of two or more audience segments across key metrics side by side. Use this skill when someone wants to compare audiences, cohorts, or groups — for example, "how do mobile users compare to desktop users on conversion," "compare new vs. returning visitors," "show me the difference between these two segments," "compare these audiences on our KPIs," or "which segment performs better." Also trigger for "segment comparison," "audience comparison," or "cohort comparison."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

編集前後の文章やパッチから、変更箇所を比較できる画面とPNG・PDFを作るスキル。共有用URLや添付ファイルで、修正内容を具体的に伝えられます。

• 文章の変更箇所をURLで共有したいとき
• 差分をPNGやPDFで添付したいとき
• 修正確認用の高品質な資料作成

候補の探索や比較を繰り返し、試行の根拠と判断を追記型の台帳に残すスキル。前回との整合性や再検証の結果を確認し、実取引や本番操作へ進む条件を明確にします。

• 試行を重ねて候補を比較したいとき
• 判断の根拠を記録したいとき
• 新情報で前回の採用候補を見直したいとき

売上・返金・重複課金を請求データから整理し、チーム課金や利用権限の実装まで確認するスキル。料金表示と実際の動作を照合し、運営の判断材料をまとめます。

• 売上と契約状況を把握したいとき
• 重複課金や返金の原因調査
• チーム課金の実装を確認したいとき

類似企業の売上・利益率・評価倍率を比較するExcelを作成します。計算式、中央値や四分位、データの出典をまとめ、投資や買収の検討に使う比較資料を整えます。

• 同業他社との企業価値比較
• 買収検討用の比較資料作成
• 業界の成長性・収益性比較

記事・論文・メモを要約し、相互リンク付きのMarkdown知識集として蓄積。出典を残しながら質問への回答や比較をまとめ、矛盾やリンク切れも点検します。

• 記事や論文から調査用の知識集を作成
• 新しい資料を既存のノートに追加
• 出典付きの回答や比較を保存

Side-by-side comparison of ruflo vs HAL vs other GAIA harnesses — capability gaps, design decisions, and improvement roadmap

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create "[Competitor] alternative" and comparison pages for developer tools. Build honest, high-converting comparison content that ranks for competitive search terms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison', 'feature matrix', 'POC planning', 'sales demo prep', or 'pre-sales engineering'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two-way sync between a local paper directory and an Overleaf project, so ARIS audit/edit workflows stay on the local copy while collaborators edit in the Overleaf web UI. Use when user says "同步 overleaf", "overleaf sync", "推送到 overleaf", "connect overleaf", "Overleaf 桥接", "pull overleaf", "push overleaf", or wants to bridge their ARIS paper directory with an Overleaf project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze ARIS usage logs and propose optimizations to SKILL.md files, reviewer prompts, and workflow defaults. Outer-loop harness optimization inspired by Meta-Harness (Lee et al., 2026). Use when user says "优化技能", "meta optimize", "improve skills", "分析使用记录", or wants to optimize ARIS's own harness components based on accumulated experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads and summarises ScenarioRunner output — the criteria pass/fail tables from --output/--file, the machine-readable --json and --junit result files, and the criteria JSON written alongside a --record recording — and runs the metrics module (metrics_manager.py) to compute custom measurements over a recorded run offline, without the simulator. Use when the user asks "did the scenario pass", "why did it fail", "summarise these results", "compare these runs", or wants distance/speed/lane metrics from a recording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates .NET projects from templates with validated parameters, smart defaults, Central Package Management adaptation, and latest NuGet version resolution. USE FOR: creating new dotnet projects, scaffolding solutions with multiple projects, installing or uninstalling template packages, creating projects that respect Directory.Packages.props (CPM), composing multi-project solutions (API + tests + library), getting latest NuGet package versions in newly created projects. DO NOT USE FOR: finding templates (use template-discovery), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison of templates (use template-comparison), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), deciding cross-parameter defaults such as which framework to pair with native AOT or whether to keep HTTPS when auth is enabled (use template-smart-defaults), modifying existing projects or adding NuGet packages to existing projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares two or more dotnet new templates side by side to help users choose between them based on parameters, feature support, frameworks, and classifications. USE FOR: deciding between similar templates (webapi vs webapp, blazor vs blazorwasm, console vs worker), producing a side-by-side comparison of parameters and feature support, understanding how templates differ before creating a project. DO NOT USE FOR: creating a project from a template (use template-instantiation), authoring or validating custom templates (use template-authoring and template-validation), general single-template discovery (use template-discovery).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated Bayesian modeling workflow with PyMC and ArviZ. Contains critical guardrails (nutpie sampler, prior/posterior predictive checks, LOO-PIT calibration, prior sensitivity checks, 94% HDI, non-centered parameterizations, reproducible seeds) that agents won't apply unprompted — always consult before writing Bayesian model code. Trigger on: building probabilistic/Bayesian models, prior elicitation, MCMC inference, convergence diagnostics (divergences, R-hat, ESS), model comparison (LOO-CV, ELPD, stacking weights), hierarchical/multilevel models, count regressions, logistic regression with uncertainty, prior sensitivity analysis, reporting Bayesian results, or mentions of PyMC, ArviZ, InferenceData, credible intervals, posterior distributions, shrinkage, uncertainty quantification. Also trigger for model comparison, diagnosing sampling problems, choosing priors, or presenting stats to non-technical audiences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Programmatic SEO planning and audit: building or evaluating large sets of template-generated pages that target long-tail query patterns (e.g. "[service] in [city]", "[product] vs [product]", "[tool] for [use-case]"). Covers data-source and template design, thin/duplicate-content and doorway-page risks, per-page uniqueness and value thresholds, internal linking and hubs, indexation management (publish vs. noindex), and scaling without a manual action. Use whenever the user wants to generate many pages from a template/dataset, build location/comparison/use-case pages at scale, or asks why generated pages aren't indexing. Trigger on: "programmatic SEO", "pSEO", "generate pages at scale", "templated pages", "location pages at scale", "comparison pages", "[city] pages", "my generated pages aren't indexed", "doorway pages", "scale content". For one-off content use /content-writer; for keyword discovery use /keyword-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。