「claim」の検索結果

Use when users ask about Nexus Mutual claims history, claim statistics, approval/denial rates, payout amounts, or want to analyze past claims for a product or time period.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when claiming the AI bounty on the tDVV mainnet sidechain. This public claim skill now supports Portkey AA/CA only, requires CA sync and holder preflight before any write, and routes to AA/CA onboarding, AA/CA claim, or diagnostics-only stop handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether each claim in a manuscript is supported by the source it cites, reading the project's per-source Markdown knowledge base. Flags contradicted, unsupported, overclaimed, out-of-scope, and misattributed claims with verbatim source quotes. Runs citation-check first, and stops at a pre-flight gate when the knowledge base is missing, incomplete, or holds unconverted PDFs. Use to verify that a draft's claims match the sources it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for JWT, JWS, and JWE validation paths, header parsing, key selection, claim acceptance, audience and issuer checks, role derivation, and token-to-identity confusion bugs. Use when the user asks to inspect JWT headers or claims, key lookup, `kid` handling, `alg` confusion, audience or issuer validation, role claims, or explain how a token becomes accepted identity or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use at the start of any session on a project with a build graph (`.hedgehog/hedgehog.db`), and again at every claim/dispatch/verify cycle within it. Owns consuming the build graph — claiming task packets, delegating each to the layer's agent, running `hedgehog verify` to gate the commit, recording debt and decisions, the intent check at an intent's last layer, and when to clear context. Not for a build agent handed an already-claimed packet — that agent never claims, dispatches, or verifies; this skill is the orchestrating session's own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Release one current Proto UI work-item claim when it expired, became invalid, or the contributor stopped. Use only for the contributor's own recorded claim and only when the exact reversible GitHub mutation is authorized. Do not select replacement work, change readiness, or release another contributor's claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post one already selected Proto UI work-item claim as a reversible GitHub metadata mutation. Use after pui-select produced a current proposal and the exact claim has authorization, live permission, current readiness, and an idempotent write boundary. Do not select work, decide readiness, release claims, or widen the authorized wording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze insurance claims workflow systems for intake optimization, adjudication rules, subrogation, litigation management, and settlement analytics. Triggers: 'audit claims process', 'review FNOL workflow', 'evaluate claims automation', 'check subrogation recovery'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or customizing industry-specific guided processes in Salesforce Industries clouds: insurance claims lifecycle (FNOL through closure), telecom order management decomposition, and utility service request workflows. Trigger keywords: FNOL process design, claims OmniScript customization, Industries order decomposition workflow, utility service order design, insurance claim lifecycle stages, telecom commercial-to-technical order flow. NOT for the Industries object model — use architect/industries-data-model. NOT for Insurance Cloud licensing and policy architecture — use architect/insurance-cloud-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Salesforce Industries Insurance (Financial Services Cloud Insurance): permission set licenses, irreversible org settings, core insurance objects, coverage types, claim configuration, and OmniScript-based quoting via the Insurance Product Administration API. Trigger keywords: insurance setup, FSC Insurance, InsurancePolicy object, InsurancePolicyCoverage, policy quoting OmniScript, claim type configuration, InsProductService, Digital Insurance Platform, many-to-many policy, multiple producers. NOT for which FSC Insurance modules to license or how to architect claims and underwriting — use architect/insurance-cloud-architecture. NOT for generic OmniStudio setup, CPQ/Pricebook quoting or Health Cloud.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts U.S. Contract Disputes Act (CDA) certified claims for federal government contracts, covering FAR Part 33 compliance, entitlement/quantum sections, certification language, and final-decision demand. Use when preparing a CDA claim, certified claim, or submission to a contracting officer under the Contract Disputes Act.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts filing-ready proofs of claim for U.S. bankruptcy proceedings using Official Form B 410 under FRBP 3001. Handles secured, unsecured priority, and general unsecured claims with proper valuation, documentation, and bar date compliance. Use when a creditor needs to file or amend a proof of claim in a bankruptcy case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build our pitch deck narrative", "write a fundraising story", or "structure the sales pitch narrative"; derives from the narrative canon a company pitch/deck narrative — problem → the undeniable shift → product-as-hero → proof → the ask — as a slide-beat outline (one narrative beat per slide, with the claim ID each proof beat rests on), for both a sales pitch and a fundraising deck. Every proof beat is labeled Measured / User-provided / '[needs source]' and unverified ones route to the claims candidates. Not for the launch-window battle cards and talk track — use sales-enablement-kit; not for the durable message hierarchy or the arc itself — use message-system-architect / strategic-narrative-designer; not for finished deck visual design — out of scope; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 路演叙事/融资故事/销售 pitch/幻灯节拍

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan launch pricing", "design pricing tiers / packaging", or "set up a launch discount / early-bird offer"; produces a launch pricing and packaging plan — tier structure and naming, a value-to-price map aligned to the message house, a launch-offer ladder with a true deadline reason, beta / early-adopter pricing with a post-launch graduation path, and guarantee / refund terms — with every price claim and offer term submitted to memory/events/claims.ndjson. Not for the canonical offer / claim record — use offer-claims-registry; not for paid-newsletter subscription economics — use newsletter-monetization-planner; not for ad bidding — use bid-strategy-planner. 发布定价/梯度打包/早鸟优惠/保证设计

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to "test a claim against data", "validate an empirical hypothesis", "refine a model/theory with evidence", "characterize a pattern and verify it", "演繹と帰納で検証", "仮説をデータで検証して更新", "実例と反例で確かめる", "弁証法ループ", "主張を現物で裏取り", "傾向分析を検証して精緻化", or mentions iteratively updating a hypothesis by deriving predictions and testing them against a real corpus. NOTE: Use this for VALIDATING/REFINING an empirical claim or model against real data through a derive→test→update loop. Use strong-inference for debugging an UNKNOWN cause, and devils-advocate for adversarially stress-testing a DESIGN proposal.

Use when the user mentions connect/disconnect wallet, sign in, sign out, web3 wallet, wallet address, check balance, how much crypto do I have, send BNB/USDT/crypto, transfer tokens, swap tokens, buy/sell token, DEX trade, limit order, market order, cancel order, get a quote, transaction history, wallet settings, daily limit, slippage, MEV protection, supported chains, available networks, prediction market, predict.fun, YES/NO market, place a prediction, redeem winnings, claim payout, prediction portfolio, prediction PnL, x402 payment, HTTP 402 Payment Required, pay a known x402 API, check approvals, view token approvals, revoke approval, manage approvals, wallet approvals, authorization management, token authorization, DeFi protocols, DeFi position, DeFi portfolio, staking, liquidity pool, LP, yield farming, health factor, APY, TVL, DeFi investment, DeFi deposit, DeFi redeem, DeFi stake, DeFi unstake, add liquidity, remove liquidity, claim rewards, claim fees, or any on-chain wallet operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh Codex reviewer with no prior context; base output is same-family provisional. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. A secondary Codex agent evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with NO prior context to prevent confirmation bias. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh Claude Ads platform, API, policy, regulation, benchmark, issue, pull-request, fork, and repository evidence. Use for ads research refresh, expired refresh_due dates, stale API or platform claims, reverify-or-demote decisions, release-current claim validation, ecosystem review, current platform changes, or updating paid-media knowledge. When tools or sources are unavailable, still demote the stale claim for the current run and block dependent release-current assertions before requesting access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review marketing copy for claims that need substantiation, reframing, or cutting. Use when the user says "review this marketing copy", "check these claims", "can we say this", "is this puffery or a problem", or pastes marketing content (landing pages, emails, ads, taglines).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。