「code review loop」の検索結果

PyTorchのモデルや学習コードを作成・点検し、データ読み込み、実験の再現性、学習状態の保存、GPUメモリや処理速度の改善を支援するスキル。

• PyTorchの学習コード作成・レビュー
• 実験結果が揃わない原因を調べたいとき
• 読み込み速度やGPUメモリの改善

Autonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task. Guides the user through defining goals, measurable metrics, and scope constraints, then runs an autonomous loop of code changes, testing, measuring, and keeping/discarding results. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. USE FOR: autonomous improvement, iterative optimization, experiment loop, auto research, performance tuning, automated experimentation, hill climbing, try things automatically, optimize code, run experiments, autonomous coding loop. DO NOT USE FOR: one-shot tasks, simple bug fixes, code review, or tasks without a measurable metric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive OpenAI's Codex CLI (`codex exec`) as a non-interactive coding sub-agent from inside Claude Code. Load WHENEVER you want to delegate a coding/analysis/refactor task to Codex, get a second opinion / adversarial review from another model, fan out parallel agents across files or worktrees, or run a long mechanical job while you stay the planner. Covers the exact `codex exec` flags, sandbox tiers, output capture, JSON/schema modes, session resume, parallel fan-out, and the mandatory "delegate → capture → independently verify, never trust the self-report" supervision loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. In Copilot CLI it defaults to the native complementary rubber-duck subagent with host-event model evidence; elsewhere it uses Codex, while explicit external reviewer overrides remain available. Implements fixes and re-reviews until a policy-approved positive assessment or max rounds is reached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harden a plan with independent Claude/Codex review, then optionally build and cross-inspect it. Start in either Claude Code or Codex: the host plans and the other provider reviews. Use for claudex this plan, claudex-loop, or the legacy crucible trigger; not for trivial edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean — bounded review, fix, verify loop before opening a PR. Use when codex is installed and you want an external cross-model critic on your changes before pushing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean — bounded review, fix, verify loop before opening a PR. Use when codex is installed and you want an external cross-model critic on your changes before pushing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive escalation-resolution workflow for the bmad-loop orchestrator. A bmad-loop run paused on a CRITICAL escalation (a contradiction or gap a dev/review session could not safely resolve alone); you and the human disambiguate the frozen spec so the story can be re-driven. Invoked as /bmad-loop-resolve <story-key>. Unlike the automated dev/review sessions this session is interactive — a human is present and you SHOULD ask.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to take over, adopt, or babysit a GitHub pull request until it merges — read review feedback, fix it, resolve threads, dismiss unreasonable change requests, and merge once approved and green. Picks between driving the PR live in this session or handing it to the Looper daemon for unattended background runs, confirming with the user when unclear. Triggers on "take over this PR", "接管这个 PR", "持续修复 review 直到合并", or a Looper takeover bot comment. Works in any coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, opencode, Gemini, …) using gh + git.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALIGN-video for Claude Code with independent Codex adversarial review. Create or revise a video through agent-authored code, rendering, editing and fresh-context audiovisual review, without image, video or music generation models. Use for reference-led animation, procedural films, motion design, explainers, construction replays, and continuing an existing coded-video project. Carries the work from reference study and animatic through a finished, reproducible film; supports explicitly requested self-review when appropriate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until it reaches the repository's configured Greptile merge threshold with zero unresolved actionable comments, or until the five-review maximum is reached. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes/re-shelves, re-triggers review only for new head SHAs unless a 5/5 score is already published, and repeats. Use when the user wants to optimize a PR/MR/CL against Greptile's code review standards without creating runaway review loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Quality] Use when you need to combine /why-review + /fix in a recursive loop — each round runs /why-review to find validated findings then /fix to resolve them, then loops again over the CHANGED target until a fresh full /why-review produces zero findings (nothing left to fix).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Quality] Use when you need to combine /changes-review + /fix in a recursive loop — each round runs /changes-review (report-only) to surface validated findings over a fixed diff scope, then /fix to resolve them, then loops again with a FRESH full /changes-review over the CHANGED diff until one complete pass produces zero validated findings (nothing left to fix).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated code from a codebase while preserving behavior. Use when editing or reviewing code to make it read like a human engineer on this team wrote it. Works through a test-guarded detect-modify-verify loop: pin down the functional contract and edge cases first, write or run tests as a safety net, then rewrite AI tells (redundant comments, emoji, verbose names, reflexive try/except, defensive null-guards, over-decomposition, speculative abstraction, dead code, non-idiomatic constructs, hallucinated dependencies) and re-verify after every change. The tests decide whether a defensive block is slop or a real safeguard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), refactoring, and quality improvement. Use when reviewing code, eliminating code smells, reducing technical debt, refactoring methods, running self-critique loops, or improving maintainability and readability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task. Guides the user through defining goals, measurable metrics, and scope constraints, then runs an autonomous loop of code changes, testing, measuring, and keeping/discarding results. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. USE FOR: autonomous improvement, iterative optimization, experiment loop, auto research, performance tuning, automated experimentation, hill climbing, try things automatically, optimize code, run experiments, autonomous coding loop. DO NOT USE FOR: one-shot tasks, simple bug fixes, code review, or tasks without a measurable metric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AIエージェントが継続して作業するループを、品質確認と評価、失敗時の停止・再実行の方針を組み合わせて設計し、進捗停滞や再試行に対処するスキル。

• 継続作業のループ方式を選びたいとき
• 品質確認と評価を組み合わせたいとき
• 失敗や進捗停滞からの復旧

Djangoの公開や変更提案の前に、環境・コード品質・データベース変更・テスト・脆弱性・設定を順に検証し、段階別の合否と修正すべき問題をレポートにまとめます。

• Djangoの変更提案前の確認
• マイグレーションを確認したいとき
• テストカバレッジの目標確認

Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re-triggers until HEAD is reviewed with zero threads awaiting the agent's reply (remaining open threads are explicit hand-offs to the human — escalated declines, design tradeoffs). You merge a clean PR; the bot runs it. Trigger phrases: "address copilot comments", "run a copilot review loop", "fix this PR", "iterate on copilot feedback". Repo-agnostic, gh CLI + PowerShell. Full autopilot needs repo Triage/Write; external PR authors get single-iteration mode plus manual re-trigger (UI 🔄 or substantive-commit push).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Apache ShardingSphere or user-authorized downstream pull requests and PR discussions from public or authorized repository evidence. Use for code-correctness or mergeability decisions, CI-focused review, root-cause and regression analysis, complete consolidated findings, copy-ready committer feedback, challenged findings, multi-round review, and formal review of local implementation candidates in the repository completion loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when LoopX must manage a multi-PR or multi-MR delivery program across one or more repositories: inventory current change requests, reconcile new/merged/closed or retargeted work, preserve requirement and dependency priorities, maintain a roadmap document, or monitor material lifecycle/check/review changes over time. Use provider-neutral snapshots and one grouped continuous monitor; do not use for deep per-PR code review, approval, commenting, or merge actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up iterative design-to-code development loop with Anima SDK. Use when rapidly iterating on Figma-to-code output, comparing framework outputs, or building a local preview server for generated components. Trigger with: "anima local dev", "anima dev loop", "anima preview", "anima iteration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive manuscript review with three modes: single-pass (default), --adversarial critic-fixer loop, and --peer [journal] simulated peer-review pipeline (editor + 2 dispositioned referees + editorial decision, calibrated to a target journal). R&R continuation via --peer --r2/--r3; hostile-editor stress test via --peer --stress; reviewer-disposition variance reporting via --peer --variance N. Auto-invokes /review-r + /audit-reproducibility on referenced scripts unless --no-cross-artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。