862 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Finds, qualifies, and reaches prospects through cold outreach — list building, qualification criteria, cold email and multi-channel sequences, and the follow-up that actually gets replies. Use this to build a prospect list, write cold outreach, fix a sequence that is not getting responses, define qualification criteria, or decide whether a segment is worth pursuing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds clear, executable, and auditable inclusion and exclusion criteria for biomedical and clinical research protocols. Always use this skill when a user needs to translate a target population into operational screening rules tied to chart fields, time windows, tests, procedures, prior therapies, exclusions, and reviewable edge cases. Focus on protocol-stage precision, ambiguity reduction, auditability, and screening reproducibility rather than generic study design advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a real brainstorm — divergent generation without judgment, then convergent selection with explicit criteria — instead of listing ten obvious ideas and calling it creativity. Use when asked to brainstorm, generate ideas or options, explore a solution space, or name something. Produces a genuinely wide option set (including the weird tail), then a shortlist selected against named criteria with the rejects preserved.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate performance fairly when output is AI-assisted — what still measures the human, what now measures the tooling, and how to run the review conversation. Use when reviewing someone whose work is heavily AI-assisted, when output volume stopped meaning anything, when calibrating a team with uneven AI adoption, or when writing review criteria for the AI era. Produces review guidance: a what-measures-whom analysis, rewritten criteria, calibration rules for mixed-adoption teams, and conversation scripts. For the general review document use performance-review; for redesigning the role itself use role-redesign-for-ai.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hire an AI agent the way you'd hire an employee — a role spec with success criteria, a structured work-sample interview run on your real tasks, reference checks (what do actual users report), probation KPIs, and termination criteria written before day one. Use when choosing between AI agents/tools/copilots for a job, formalizing an AI pilot, or 'which agent should we use for X'. Produces the role spec, interview pack with scoring rubric, a decision record, and a probation plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write compelling award submissions, grant applications, and competition entries. Maps achievements to selection criteria using evidence-based narratives. Use whenever the user is applying for a business award (Telstra, chamber of commerce, industry awards), a grant, a competition, or any submission demonstrating merit against defined criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare several Japanese NLP libraries, models, or datasets for a keyword (a specific tool name, or a function/task like '形態素解析') across a handful of criteria chosen for that comparison, rendered as a ○/△/✕ table. Use when the user wants a side-by-side comparison of multiple Japanese NLP tools/libraries/datasets, not just the single best one. Trigger phrases include 'X と Y と Z を比較して', '形態素解析ライブラリを比較', 'MeCab と Sudachi どっちがいい', 'どのツールを使うべき', 'compare japanese tokenizers', 'mecab vs sudachi vs janome', 'which embedding model should I use', '日本語NERライブラリの比較表', 'pros and cons of japanese OCR tools'. For a single ranked list use search; for alternatives to one specific tool (or contribution candidates) without a multi-axis table, use discover.
Expert WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) advisor covering WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 — the W3C international accessibility standards. Use this skill whenever a user asks about WCAG success criteria, conformance levels (A/AA/AAA), accessibility audits, POUR principles, accessibility statements, ARIA patterns, colour contrast, keyboard accessibility, screen reader compatibility, mobile accessibility, cognitive accessibility, WCAG 2.2 new criteria, WCAG 3.0 preview, legal requirements referencing WCAG (EN 301 549, EAA, ADA, Section 508), or mapping WCAG to accessibility laws. Trigger for any web or digital content accessibility question — even if the user doesn't say "skill" or "WCAG".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like "we need to get audited", "a customer asked for our security report", "writing an information security policy", or "preparing for an audit". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Running closed and open betas that produce real signal. Beta participant selection, structured feedback collection, beta-to-GA decision criteria, and the difference between soft-launch (no structure, no signal), kitchen-sink (everyone in, no actionable feedback), and structured beta (calibrated cohort, intentional feedback loops, clear graduation criteria). Triggers on beta program, alpha test, beta cohort, beta participant, beta feedback, beta to GA decision, design partner, early access program, closed beta, open beta, RC release. Also triggers when a feature is approaching launch and the team needs structured pre-GA validation, when prior betas produced noise rather than signal, or when the team has soft-launched before but wants more structured feedback this time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validation-first design for Cavekit — every kit requirement must be automatically verifiable. Six-gate validation pipeline, phase gates, merge protocol, completion signals, acceptance criteria patterns. Use when designing acceptance criteria, wiring CI gates, or debugging why an agent is producing output that nobody can verify.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) advisor covering WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 — the W3C international accessibility standards. Use this skill whenever a user asks about WCAG success criteria, conformance levels (A/AA/AAA), accessibility audits, POUR principles, accessibility statements, ARIA patterns, colour contrast, keyboard accessibility, screen reader compatibility, mobile accessibility, cognitive accessibility, WCAG 2.2 new criteria, WCAG 3.0 preview, legal requirements referencing WCAG (EN 301 549, EAA, ADA, Section 508), or mapping WCAG to accessibility laws. Trigger for any web or digital content accessibility question — even if the user doesn't say "skill" or "WCAG".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like "we need to get audited", "a customer asked for our security report", "writing an information security policy", or "preparing for an audit". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Unpack a broad standard or competency descriptor into specific, assessable success criteria and sub-skills. Use when interpreting curriculum standards or writing learning objectives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screen and evaluate A-share investment opportunities. Adapts the original deal-screening skill for Chinese market data sources, A-share screening criteria, and domestic deal origination. Triggers on "A股标的筛选", "标的筛选", "screening China", "deal screening A-share", "筛选投资标的", or "screen for [criteria]".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence quality validation and decision gate criteria for product discovery reviews
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review criteria for the nw-diverger-reviewer — validates JTBD rigor, research quality, option diversity, taste application correctness, and recommendation coherence in DIVERGE wave artifacts
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluation criteria and scoring for data engineering artifact reviews
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trigger only when the user explicitly requests live Jira or Zephyr retrieval, existing-link inspection, linking authored test cases, label updates, or stale-link audits. Do not trigger for analysis-only prompts such as 'Analyze the acceptance criteria for TICK-4521', supplied acceptance criteria, test-case authoring, or AC-to-test generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standardize PRD discovery and drafting for product scope, user outcomes, requirement IDs, and acceptance criteria. Use when creating PRD, product requirements, feature specification, or acceptance criteria plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
User story generation - INVEST criteria, acceptance criteria (BDD/Given-When-Then), story mapping, epic decomposition, edge case stories, NFR stories
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transforms project briefs into testable specifications with user stories and acceptance criteria. Use after brainstorming, before planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the Privacy Threshold Analysis screening process to determine whether a full DPIA is required. Provides a quick-screen questionnaire, threshold criteria based on WP248rev.01, escalation triggers, and documentation requirements. Activate when evaluating new processing activities, system changes, or procurement decisions. Keywords: PTA, privacy threshold analysis, DPIA screening, quick-screen, threshold criteria, WP248, escalation triggers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides implementation of GDPR Article 42-43 data protection certification mechanisms including accredited certification bodies, criteria development, and periodic review. Activate when pursuing privacy certifications, evaluating certification bodies, or developing certification criteria. Keywords: certification, Article 42, Article 43, accreditation, seal, privacy mark.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。