「discipline」の検索結果

React 18/19の画面部品を実装・レビューする際に、状態管理やデータ取得、フォーム、読み込み・エラー表示、アクセシビリティの設計を支えるスキル。

• Reactの画面部品をレビューしたいとき
• 共有する状態の置き場所を決めたいとき
• フォームとデータ取得の設計

複雑な作業や失敗から、根本原因、次回の行動、問題を見分ける兆候を抽出し、再利用できる学習記録にまとめます。同じ原因の既存記録との重複も整理します。

• 複雑な作業後に学びを残したいとき
• 障害調査の原因と教訓の記録
• 同じ原因の学習記録を統合したいとき

顧客や取引先が参加するチャットで、エージェントの応答条件と送信内容を定めるスキル。呼びかけへの応答、内部情報の保護、承認用の下書きへの切り分けを扱います。

• 顧客グループでの応答ルール設定
• 取引先への返信から内部情報を守りたいとき
• 価格や契約の回答を承認用下書きに分ける

AIエージェントの不調を、指示・記憶・ツール実行・画面表示など12の層から調べるスキル。コードやログを根拠に原因を整理し、重要度順の指摘と修正案をまとめます。

• アプリ内だけで起きる不調を調べたいとき
• 過去の会話が混ざる原因を調査
• ツールの未実行や実行の誤報を確認

Audit a python-pptx export against its source HTML deck, identify layout/content drift (footer overflow, cropped content, missing italic/em, lost styling, off-rhythm spacing), and re-export with strict footer-rail + cursor-flow layout discipline. Use this skill whenever the user has a .pptx that was generated from an HTML slide deck and asks to compare/audit/verify/fix the export — including phrases like "compare ppt with html", "fidelity audit", "fix the pptx", "ppt is cut off", "footer overlap", "italic missing in pptx", "re-export the deck", "pptx-html-fidelity-audit", or any case where a python-pptx → HTML round-trip needs verification or repair. Also trigger when the user shows you a deck.html and a deck.pptx side by side and is debugging visual differences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes a written ulw-plan work plan with Boulder state, evidence ledger, worktree discipline, and parallel subagents. Use when the user says ulw-execute or asks to run a .omo/plans plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate 4-30 second cinematic video with ByteDance Seedance 2.5 through fal.ai, Volcengine Ark, Runway, or ComfyUI Partner Nodes. Use for long single generations, synchronized audio, and large multimodal reference sets (up to 30 images, 10 videos, and 10 audio clips). Also covers the 2.5 prompt contract: section order, multi-shot "Hard cut" breakdown, named locks for continuity across cuts, the asset and character-sheet method, voice conditioning, and iteration discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rules for when an agent should recall from long-term memory before acting and when it should save decisions, corrections and failures afterwards. Works with any memory backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Board meeting preparation, investor updates, and executive communication. Use when preparing board decks, writing investor updates, handling bad news with the board, structuring QBRs, or building board-level metric discipline. Includes the "Three Things" narrative model, the 4-tier metric hierarchy, and the pre-brief pattern that prevents board surprises.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A short self-bias checklist to run at the START of any investment research task (stock screen / sector study / company deep-dive). Four biases that systematically warp AI research — leader-bias (only big caps), English-bias (miss JP/KR/TW players), narrative-bias (chase concept labels), confirmation-bias (only bullish evidence) — plus recency-bias. Load this first, then research with the corrections in mind. Not a workflow, just a 60-second attitude reset that materially improves coverage and honesty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Buy-side discipline system. For each holding, maintain a written investment thesis — core thesis in 5 sentences, falsifiable assumptions, red lines, valuation anchors — and re-check it each quarter against new earnings/events. Scores thesis health 1-10 from assumption breakage and red-line triggers, and recommends hold / add / trim / exit. Use it right after buying a stock (to write the thesis) and every earnings season (to check it). Bridges the research→buy→monitor gap that most investors skip.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standing context for Slack sibling agents — one room per team, creator-posted introductions, bot-to-bot hop discipline. Ships as instructions.md composed into the group's CLAUDE.md at spawn; there is no workflow to invoke.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pro frontend engineering discipline. Enforces build-test-verify workflow for every web project. Never declare done until the site is built, tested, responsive, accessible, and visually verified in a real browser. Pairs with a deployment skill such as vercel-cli, where one is installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you report a brain page to the user — created, edited, committed, or relayed from a subagent — a working link is part of the deliverable, in the SAME message. Derive the path mechanically (git ls-files --full-name), push BEFORE linking, verify the link resolves when a hosted remote exists, and degrade through a defined fallback chain when it doesn't. Inside brain pages the rule inverts: relative links preserve the link graph; absolute URLs are for chat deliverables only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end discipline for turning any large data source (audio libraries, email takeouts, document corpora, chat exports, API dumps) into brain pages at scale. The lifecycle spine: SCHEMA → ACCESS → TRIAL → EVALUATE → IMPROVE → CODIFY → TEST → SKILLIFY → BULK → MONITOR. State is tracked in a durable JSON manifest (see MANIFEST-PATTERN.md) so any crash, session boundary, or subagent fan-out resumes from ground truth instead of memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The session loop that makes agentmemory pay off, recall before starting work, save at decision points, learn from corrections. Use when starting a nontrivial task, after settling a decision or debugging a gotcha, or whenever deciding if something belongs in memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cmux package architecture, refactor layering, dependency inversion, file organization, DocC documentation, package design discipline, testability, and Swift 6 concurrency rules. Use before adding or meaningfully rewriting Swift files, Swift packages, coordinators, services, repositories, or public package APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning and synthesizing product/user research as a method-and-repository discipline — selecting the right method for the goal (generative interviews vs usability test vs concept test vs validation), computing method-based saturation/sample size with an explicit confidence level, or synthesizing coded observations into insights while flagging single-source anecdotes. Never fabricates user insight; an insight requires recurrence across independent participants. Distinct from product-team/ux-researcher-designer (persona/journey artifacts), product-discovery (discovery-sprint planning), and experiment-designer (live A/B) — this is the research-ops method + insight-repository layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns marketing prompts into tested, versioned production assets: A/B prompt evaluation against structured test cases, immutable prompt version history with diffs, ready-to-use marketing prompt templates (ad copy, email campaigns, social posts, landing pages, SEO meta), and an LLM-governance playbook for marketing teams (claim discipline, disclosure rules, human-review gates). Use when a marketing team relies on AI-generated content and needs prompt quality to be measurable and safe — or when the user mentions 'prompt engineering,' 'improve my prompts,' 'prompt templates,' 'prompt versioning,' 'AI content workflow,' or 'AI governance for marketing.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when defining, reviewing, or operating SLOs/SLIs/error budgets. Triggers on "define an SLO", "what should our SLO be", "error budget", "burn rate", "SLI", "service level objective", "Google SRE workbook", "multi-window burn-rate alert", or any reliability-target question. Ships SLO designer, error-budget calculator with multi-window burn-rate thresholds, and SLO reviewer that catches the common bugs (target too aggressive, window too short, conflicting SLOs, no SLI definition). 4 references on SLO principles + SLI design + error budget math + composition with feature-flags-architect/chaos-engineering/kubernetes-operator. NOT a generic observability skill — specifically the SLO discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VP of Engineering advisory for startups: delivery throughput (DORA 4 metrics + bottleneck identification), engineering hiring funnel (sourcing → screen → onsite → offer conversion + time-to-fill + pipeline gap), engineering team structure (squad/tribe/chapter design + tech-lead manager-trigger thresholds), and production discipline (on-call, deployment cadence, postmortem culture). Use when sprint velocity is dropping, eng hiring is broken, team structure is unclear, or deciding when to add a tech-lead manager. NOT a CTO skill (which owns architecture) — VPE owns delivery operations and how the team ships.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or revising a company's commercial policy — the rules of engagement governing discounts off list price, approver thresholds, exception flows, and the deal framework that Deal Desk and AEs operate under. Covers discount matrix design (ARR band x term length x payment terms x strategic value), commercial policy design, exception policy, discount governance, approval thresholds, deal framework structure, and policy linting (contradictions, gaps, cliff edges, gaming surfaces). For Head of Commercial, Head of Deal Desk, VP Sales, or RevOps at the policy-design moment — NOT per-deal application (that is deal-desk) and NOT pricing model selection (that is pricing-strategist).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:vpe-review <plan> — Throughput-first VP of Engineering interrogation of any plan that touches delivery, eng hiring, team structure, or production discipline. Use when cycle time balloons, DORA metrics slide, or before committing to an eng hiring wave or a reorg.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Head of Ops, Knowledge Manager, or TPM-Internal needs to author, validate, or clean up company SOPs and internal runbooks (procurement intake, vendor offboarding, incident-comms cascade, employee onboarding) — including 5W2H completeness checks (Who-What-When-Where-Why-How-HowMuch), cross-link and orphan-page validation across a sprawling Notion/Confluence/Obsidian wiki, KB ingestion + hygiene reporting, and runbook step verification (named owner, expected duration, observable success signal, rollback path, escalation contact). Pairs Ishikawa's 5W2H method, Gawande's *The Checklist Manifesto*, ISO 9001, ITIL v4, and Google SRE Workbook runbook discipline with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools that score completeness, detect anti-patterns, and emit prioritized cleanup lists (e.g., "validate this runbook before it goes into rotation", "audit our Confluence wiki for stale and orphaned SOPs").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。