1,718 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Resilience testing specialist for failure injection, game day planning, and building confidence in system reliabilityUse when "chaos engineering, resilience testing, failure injection, game day, fault tolerance, chaos experiment, disaster recovery, reliability testing, chaos-engineering, resilience, failure-injection, game-day, fault-tolerance, reliability, testing, litmus, chaos-monkey, ml-memory" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarksUse when "agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent, testing, evaluation, benchmark, agents, reliability, quality" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
侍酒师与葡萄酒 (侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。) Master OS — automated mastery of 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 侍酒师 / 葡萄酒 (Sommelier & Wine) — 葡萄酒鉴赏 + 侍酒服务的职业认知操作系统，从业者/侍酒师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 两大认证体系张力 — WSET (Wine & Spirit Education Trust, 英国, 知识+SAT 系统化品鉴方法, Diploma/L4 笔试导向) vs Court of Master Sommeliers (CMS, 美/英, 服务+盲品演绎法+理论三位一体, MS 头衔), 外加 Institute of Masters of Wine (MW, 学术研究+论文) 与 UC Davis 葡萄酒学/葡萄栽培学学院派; (b) 盲品 = 纯 tacit 校准技能 — 演绎品鉴网格 (deductive tasting: 看色/闻香/品味 → 结构线索 calculated structure → 推断品种/产区/年份/酒龄), WSET SAT vs CMS deductive grid 两套方法论; (c) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (产区/品种/酒法/风土/酿造/葡萄栽培) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (品鉴味觉记忆/盲品/侍酒服务), 这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的知识」与「不可言传的味觉」之间; (d) 旧世界 vs 新世界框架 — 旧世界以风土/法定产区为组织原则 (AOC/DOCG/QbA 分级法), 新世界以品种为标签; 风土 (terroir) 是核心组织概念; (e) 侍酒服务/酒店层 — 餐厅 floor 的配餐 (food pairing)、醒酒/侍酒温度、酒单与酒窖管理、by-the-glass 与饮品项目经济学、盲品 service exam; (f) 葡萄酒商业层 — 三级分销体系 (美国 three-tier)、定价/配额 (allocation)、期酒 (en primeur)、投资酒 (Liv-ex) 与拍卖; (g) 智识/品味演进 — 帕克百分制 (Robert Parker / Wine Advocate 100-point) vs Jancis Robinson 20 分制散文派; 经典派 vs 现代派酿造; 自然酒/低干预 (natural/minimal-intervention) vs 传统技术派. 学派分歧: WSET 知识体系派 vs CMS 服务盲品派、旧世界风土派 vs 新世界品种/技术派、自然酒派 vs 传统派、百分制点评派 vs 散文叙述派、经典平衡派 vs 浓郁现代派. 不含: 家庭自酿 DIY 套件、纯调酒/鸡尾酒/烈酒、葡萄园重型农机工程、酒精成瘾/公共卫生政策、酒类电商运营纯营销。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「侍酒师」「sommelier」「葡萄酒」「wine」「盲品」
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
调香师与香水 (调香师 / 香水 (Perfumery & Fragrance) — 香水创作与香气调配的职业认知操作系统，从业者/调香师/评香师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (原料知识/香料化学/嗅觉家族分类/accord 和弦/配方结构 %/挥发度金字塔/IFRA 法规) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (嗅觉记忆/闻香训练/「the nose」/创作直觉/盲嗅识别)，这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的原料与公式」与「不可言传的嗅觉记忆与品味」之间，嗅觉记忆是极致 tacit 技能; (b) 法系传统 vs 分子/合成派 — 法国 Grasse 天然香料 + haute parfumerie 艺术传统 (天然精油/原精/学徒制) vs 现代分子派 (aroma chemicals 香基/captives 专利分子/headspace 顶空捕香/功能香精)，两套对「香水是什么」的世界观; (c) 培养/传承 — ISIPCA (凡尔赛香水学校) + 四大香精公司内部调香学校 (Givaudan/Firmenich(DSM-Firmenich)/IFF/Symrise) + 学徒制 + 「鼻子」tacit 校准; 角色分工: perfumer(parfumeur 调香师) vs evaluator(评香师) vs flavorist(食用香精师); (d) 行业结构 — 四大香精公司寡头 (Givaudan/DSM-Firmenich/IFF/Symrise) + Mane/Robertet/Takasago，为品牌做 B2B 命题创作 (the brief → creation → mods 模型); vs niche/indie 小众独立香水 (artisanal/直营); 天然 (Grasse/精油) vs 合成 (香基/captives) 的成本与可持续之争; (e) 创作层 — 香调金字塔 (top/heart/base notes 前中后调)、accord 和弦、配方 (酒精中 % 浓度)、浓度分级 (parfum/EDP/EDT/EDC)、调香师的「香风琴」orgue、trials/mods 试样迭代、weighing 称量精度; (f) 法规与安全 — IFRA standards (原料限用)、EU 致敏原标签 (26→80+ allergens)、REACH、橡苔/atranol 限用、经典香水 (Mitsouko/Chanel No.5) 因法规被迫重配 (reformulation) 与创作自由之张力; (g) 评价/批评 — Luca Turin & Tania Sanchez (《Perfumes: The Guide》《The Secret of Scent》气味的科学)、香评人、Fragrantica/Basenotes 社区、vintage vs reformulation 之争、niche vs designer 之争。学派分歧: 法系天然传统派 vs 分子合成派、天然纯粹派 vs 合成实用派、haute parfumerie/niche 艺术派 vs mass designer 商业派、「鼻子=艺术家」vs「调香师=香气工程师/技师」、嗅觉科学之争 (Luca Turin 振动理论 vs 主流形状/受体理论)。不含: 香薰蜡烛/家居香氛纯生产营销、芳香疗法健康宣称 (aromatherapy)、纯化妆品配方学 (超出香精范畴)、DIY 家用香氛套件、精油传销/MLM。) Master OS — automated mastery of 调香师 / 香水 (Perfumery & Fragrance) — 香水创作与香气调配的职业认知操作系统，从业者/调香师/评香师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (原料知识/香料化学/嗅觉家族分类/accord 和弦/配方结构 %/挥发度金字塔/IFRA 法规) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (嗅觉记忆/闻香训练/「the nose」/创作直觉/盲嗅识别)，这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的原料与公式」与「不可言传的嗅觉记忆与品味」之间，嗅觉记忆是极致 tacit 技能; (b) 法系传统 vs 分子/合成派 — 法国 Grasse 天然香料 + haute parfumerie 艺术传统 (天然精油/原精/学徒制) vs 现代分子派 (aroma chemicals 香基/captives 专利分子/headspace 顶空捕香/功能香精)，两套对「香水是什么」的世界观; (c) 培养/传承 — ISIPCA (凡尔赛香水学校) + 四大香精公司内部调香学校 (Givaudan/Firmenich(DSM-Firmenich)/IFF/Symrise) + 学徒制 + 「鼻子」tacit 校准; 角色分工: perfumer(parfumeur 调香师) vs evaluator(评香师) vs flavorist(食用香精师); (d) 行业结构 — 四大香精公司寡头 (Givaudan/DSM-Firmenich/IFF/Symrise) + Mane/Robertet/Takasago，为品牌做 B2B 命题创作 (the brief → creation → mods 模型); vs niche/indie 小众独立香水 (artisanal/直营); 天然 (Grasse/精油) vs 合成 (香基/captives) 的成本与可持续之争; (e) 创作层 — 香调金字塔 (top/heart/base notes 前中后调)、accord 和弦、配方 (酒精中 % 浓度)、浓度分级 (parfum/EDP/EDT/EDC)、调香师的「香风琴」orgue、trials/mods 试样迭代、weighing 称量精度; (f) 法规与安全 — IFRA standards (原料限用)、EU 致敏原标签 (26→80+ allergens)、REACH、橡苔/atranol 限用、经典香水 (Mitsouko/Chanel No.5) 因法规被迫重配 (reformulation) 与创作自由之张力; (g) 评价/批评 — Luca Turin & Tania Sanchez (《Perfumes: The Guide》《The Secret of Scent》气味的科学)、香评人、Fragrantica/Basenotes 社区、vintage vs reformulation 之争、niche vs designer 之争。学派分歧: 法系天然传统派 vs 分子合成派、天然纯粹派 vs 合成实用派、haute parfumerie/niche 艺术派 vs mass designer 商业派、「鼻子=艺术家」vs「调香师=香气工程师/技师」、嗅觉科学之争 (Luca Turin 振动理论 vs 主流形状/受体理论)。不含: 香薰蜡烛/家居香氛纯生产营销、芳香疗法健康宣称 (aromatherapy)、纯化妆品配方学 (超出香精范畴)、DIY 家用香氛套件、精油传销/MLM。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 调香师 / 香水 (Perfumery & Fragrance) — 香水创作与香气调配的职业认知操作系统，从业者/调香师/评香师/学习者视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — codifiable 理论层 (原料知识/香料化学/嗅觉家族分类/accord 和弦/配方结构 %/挥发度金字塔/IFRA 法规) ⇄ tacit 校准层 (嗅觉记忆/闻香训练/「the nose」/创作直觉/盲嗅识别)，这行的核心矛盾是「可背诵的原料与公式」与「不可言传的嗅觉记忆与品味」之间，嗅觉记忆是极致 tacit 技能; (b) 法系传统 vs 分子/合成派 — 法国 Grasse 天然香料 + haute parfumerie 艺术传统 (天然精油/原精/学徒制) vs 现代分子派 (aroma chemicals 香基/captives 专利分子/headspace 顶空捕香/功能香精)，两套对「香水是什么」的世界观; (c) 培养/传承 — ISIPCA (凡尔赛香水学校) + 四大香精公司内部调香学校 (Givaudan/Firmenich(DSM-Firmenich)/IFF/Symrise) + 学徒制 + 「鼻子」tacit 校准; 角色分工: perfumer(parfumeur 调香师) vs evaluator(评香师) vs flavorist(食用香精师); (d) 行业结构 — 四大香精公司寡头 (Givaudan/DSM-Firmenich/IFF/Symrise) + Mane/Robertet/Takasago，为品牌做 B2B 命题创作 (the brief → creation → mods 模型); vs niche/indie 小众独立香水 (artisanal/直营); 天然 (Grasse/精油) vs 合成 (香基/captives) 的成本与可持续之争; (e) 创作层 — 香调金字塔 (top/heart/base notes 前中后调)、ac
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CSS design tokens and color system for vehicle insurance platform. Use when defining colors, spacing, typography, or design variables. Keywords: eye-care colors #5B8DEF/#8B95A5/#C5CAD3, CSS variables, spacing system, color palette, typography scale, design tokens, variables.css, theme colors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish Service Level Objectives (SLO), Service Level Indicators (SLI), and Service Level Agreements (SLA) with error budget tracking, burn rate alerts, and automated reporting using Prometheus and tools like Sloth or Pyrra. Use when defining reliability targets for customer-facing services, balancing feature velocity against system reliability through error budgets, migrating from arbitrary uptime goals to data-driven metrics, or implementing Site Reliability Engineering practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix silent incorrect results in RFDB Datalog queries that share a variable between two edge atoms on opposite ends (e.g. self-join patterns like `edge(M, C, "T1"), edge(C, M, "T2")`). Use when: (1) a Datalog rule returns rows that look structurally wrong (e.g. a self-loop rule reports hits but pinning M to each reported id refutes the edge existence), (2) Cypher `MATCH (m)-[:R1]->(c)-[:R2]->(m)` returns the same bogus rows (engine-level bug, not Datalog-specific), (3) results change when you bind one variable explicitly vs. leave it free. Root cause: hash- join fast path in `eval_edge_hash_join` / `eval_incoming_hash_join` unconditionally rebinds the non-key Term::Var without checking whether the variable is already bound in the current row.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Analyze and mitigate the bullwhip effect where demand variability amplifies upstream in supply chains. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose order variability amplification, quantify the bullwhip ratio, or implement dampening strategies — even if they say 'why are our orders so volatile', 'supply chain variability', or 'demand amplification problem'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess the scientific integrity and trustworthiness of publications before relying on their findings. Use this skill whenever evaluating a paper for a workflow, citing a study, building an analysis on published methods, or when a user asks about the reliability of a study. Checks for formal retractions, corrections, expressions of concern, and — critically — informal contradictions where subsequent studies failed to reproduce key findings. Integrates with PubMed, bioRxiv, and Consensus to provide a trust assessment. Use this skill for ANY publication evaluation, retraction checking, author reliability assessment, or when a user says "can I trust this paper", "is this study reliable", "has this been refuted", or "check this publication".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates guidance for reliability, resilience, availability, redundancy, fault-tolerance, and disaster recovery (DR) for Google Cloud workloads based on the design principles and recommendations in the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework. Use when the user asks to evaluate, design, or improve the reliability, resilience, availability, or disaster recovery capabilities of Google Cloud workloads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves GKE workload reliability, using PDBs, health probes, and topology spread constraints. Use when configuring GKE workload reliability, setting up PDBs, or configuring GKE health probes (liveness, readiness, startup). Don't use for disaster recovery setup or full cluster backups (use gke-backup-dr instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configuring or troubleshooting Salesforce CPQ Advanced Approvals: SBAA__ApprovalRule__c, SBAA__ApprovalVariable__c for cross-line aggregation, SBAA__ApprovalChain__c for ordered approver sequences, escalation timeouts, Smart Approvals for re-quote skip logic, and the managed package's permission sets. Trigger keywords: CPQ Advanced Approvals, SBAA approval rule, approval variable, approval chain, discount approval, line-level approval, Smart Approvals, requote approval. NOT for standard non-CPQ Salesforce approval processes - use admin/approval-processes. NOT for CPQ price rules and discount schedules - use admin/cpq-pricing-rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces internal case viability and conflict check memos for personal injury litigation intake. Screens conflicts, assesses liability and damages, checks statute of limitations, and outputs an accept/decline recommendation. Use when evaluating new PI intake, running conflict checks, assessing case merit pre-filing, or preparing acceptance memos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a U.S. Asset Purchase Agreement for deals where a buyer acquires specified business assets while avoiding unwanted liabilities. Enforces itemized asset/liability schedules, purchase price mechanics with working capital true-ups, IRS Form 8594 tax allocation, seller and buyer reps and warranties with disclosure schedules, pre- and post-closing covenants, closing conditions and deliveries, and indemnification with basket/cap limits. Use when drafting an asset purchase agreement, APA, asset acquisition, purchase and sale of assets, asset deal, or excluded liabilities agreement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces structured asset and liability summaries from financial documents for legal proceedings. Extracts valuations, ownership classifications, and encumbrances, then outputs net-worth overview, categorized schedules, disputed items, and documentation gaps. Use when preparing financial summaries for divorce/dissolution, estate planning, bankruptcy, business valuation, or settlement negotiations. Trigger on: net worth summary, marital estate, balance sheet, asset schedule, liability schedule, community/separate property.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommends continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) over multiple daily injections (MDI) for adults with type 1 diabetes who have achieved their A1C goal but experience severe hypoglycemia or high glucose variability, provided the patient and caregivers are willing and able to use the device. Consider CSII when clinicians hear 'A1C is at goal but patient has severe lows or glucose swings' or think 'pump for hypoglycemia-prone controlled T1DM'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommends postpartum endocrine care (diabetes management) in addition to usual obstetric care for individuals with preexisting diabetes (including those with pregnancy loss or termination). Triggered by postpartum care planning for patients with diabetes after delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill suggests administering a glucocorticoid antagonist (e.g., mifepristone) in patients with Cushing's disease who have diabetes or glucose intolerance and are not surgical candidates or have persistent disease after transsphenoidal surgery. Consider when encountering persistent hypercortisolism after TSS, contraindications to surgery, or comorbid diabetes/glucose intolerance requiring medical control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
System reference for the crouton layout engine (@fyit/crouton-layout) — the LayoutTree/layout_configs data model, the croutonLayoutBlocks registry and sizing contract, the viability metric, the deterministic placer (#709), and how layouts persist and seed. Use when reasoning about WHY a layout renders/composes/persists the way it does, when a question is shaped like "what is a LayoutTree / where do layouts live / why did the placer pick this arrangement / why won't this pane shrink / where does minWidth get read", or when a generated POC boots with the wrong (or no) default layout. Trigger phrases: "layout tree", "layout_configs", "viability check", "composeDefaultLayout", "block sizing contract", "why is my layout not viable". For authoring a block component, use the block-authoring skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods (NIST HB 151) — the practical statistics reference for engineering, metrology, and quality. Use for: exploratory data analysis and the four univariate assumptions (4-plot); measurement process characterization including bias/precision, calibration designs, gauge R&R, and ISO/GUM uncertainty budgets; production process characterization (stability vs. capability); process modeling and regression (LS/WLS/NLS/LOESS); design of experiments (screening, fractional/factorial, response-surface, Taguchi); statistical process control (Shewhart/CUSUM/EWMA charts, capability indices, acceptance sampling); product/process comparisons (hypothesis tests and confidence intervals for 1/2/3+ groups, ANOVA, multiple comparisons); and reliability (lifetime & repair-rate models, accelerated testing, reliability growth). Scope limits: this is applied frequentist statistics for measurement and quality — it does NOT reproduce the per-distribution formula galleries, worked case studies, datasets, plot images, or Dataplot/R code of the original web Handbook (those are described, not copied); it is thin on modern machine learning, Bayesian methods beyond conjugate reliability priors, time-series/forecasting, and Bayesian experimental design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8729.1A — NASA's R&M (Reliability and Maintainability) standard covering spaceflight and support systems (Revision A, 2017-06-13). Use for NASA's objectives-driven R&M framework — the R&M objectives hierarchy (one Top Objective decomposed into four sub-objectives, paired with tailorable strategies), how R&M requirements are established inside the SMA Plan required by NPR 7120.5, the SMA Technical Authority concurrence/independent-evaluation governance, milestone vs. readiness review gates, the reliability/maintainability/availability vocabulary (Ai vs. Ao, the failure causal chain, risk as a triplet), and the R&M Evidentiary Methods catalogue (FMEA/FMECA, FTA, RBDA, RCM, LORA, plus the space-environment and parts-pedigree analyses). Scoped to NASA spaceflight and support systems and to assurance planning: it is an objectives-and-strategies standard, so it deliberately does NOT prescribe step-by-step analysis procedures (those live in the referenced NASA Preferred Reliability Practices) and is thin on facility R&M, detailed math/derivations, and non-NASA or commercial life cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when explaining or writing TBQ3 language syntax, including Params, Vars, Events, data types, variables, sequence variables, arrays, Map variables, control flow, operators, assignment, functions, and formula execution rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read, query, and write WooCommerce product variations correctly — the WC_Product_Variable (parent) vs WC_Product_Variation (child) class split, the parent's get_variation_prices( $for_display ) cached aggregation and how to bust the wc_var_prices_<id> transient, programmatic variation creation via WC_Product_Variation + set_parent_id + set_attributes + save followed by WC_Product_Variable::sync, the inherited-vs-own variation stock model (parent flag, variation flag, derived stock_status), get_available_variations for frontend variation data, and the $for_display tax-handling parameter that breaks display logic when forgotten. Use when scaffolding plugin code that creates / queries / modifies variations or when debugging stale variation data after programmatic writes. Triggers on WC_Product_Variation, WC_Product_Variable, get_variation_prices, get_available_variations, product_variation post type, wc_var_prices, sync_variation, or programmatic variation creation context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Blameless — blameless incident management, SLO tracking, retrospectives, and reliability insights. Covers incident lifecycle, blameless retrospective facilitation, follow-up tracking, reliability scorecards, and incident type categorization. Use when managing active incidents, conducting retrospectives, tracking SLO compliance, or analyzing reliability trends in Blameless.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。