「inline」の検索結果

Place pre-screened literature citations into a LaTeX or Word manuscript, or restyle the citations already in one. Three modes: (1) inline placement — inline \cite{}/\citet{}/\citep{} with a compiled references.bib, for author-date journals (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago author-date, IEEE, Vancouver); (2) footnote placement — full formatted \footnote{} or OOXML footnotes for legal and notes styles (Bluebook, OSCOLA, Chicago, APA, McGill) with Id./supra short forms; (3) restyle — convert existing footnote citations from one style to another. This skill is manual-invoke ONLY — trigger ONLY when the user explicitly runs /cite-placement or explicitly names the "cite-placement" skill. Do NOT auto-trigger on general citation, footnote, or reference requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when finishing spec.md before writing test-definitions.md, or when the review gate asks for a spec review — self-reviews the just-authored spec inline and earns its Tier 1 review stamp. Your own inline pass; do not spawn a sub-agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Confluence collaboration surface via the confluence-as wrapper: comments, attachments, labels, watchers. Triggers: 'add comment to page 12345', 'upload attachment to page 12345', 'label page 12345 as urgent', 'watch page 12345'. Inline-vs-footer comment safety enforced. NOT for page CRUD (mk:confluence-page); NOT for bulk ops (mk:confluence-bulk).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dev-graph を静的 HTML に可視化したいとき、外部 CDN/npm なしの自己完結 SVG + inline JS 成果物を生成したいときに使う。

Detects deeply nested loops with duplicated inline logic and recommends extracting into small, named functions. Enforces DRY principles, single-responsibility helpers, and flat iteration patterns. Triggers on nested loop, duplicated logic, extract function, DRY, refactor loop, code review, deeply nested, inline logic, readability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

plan artifact がある時のみ、plan 中の assumption / open question が実装で解消された証拠を diff・PR 本文と突合する evidence-sufficiency 観点。解消されないまま残った前提・未記録の新規 Unknown を検出する。plan 欠損時は発火しない（Pre-execution Gate）。plan 欠損でも PR 本文に前提が inline 列挙されていれば列挙分のみ部分評価し、計画 issue の bare 参照だけなら skip する

修正完了後に agent-review-kit でレビューHTMLを生成し、ユーザーがブラウザで書いた差分コメントを Codex または Claude Code の同一セッションで受け取り、回答・修正・resolve を未解決0件まで繰り返すレビューループ。AIレビューの指摘を add-comment でブラウザ上のコメントとして表示し、ユーザーが返信した指摘だけ修正する「AIレビューモード」も含む。実装プラン・設計書などの任意HTMLを publish-html でレンダリング済みのまま表示し、要素クリック・テキスト範囲でコメントを受け取る「HTMLレビューモード」も含む。他のレビュースキルの結果の出力先として agent-review-kit が指定された場合も、このスキルを読んで AI レビューモードの手順に従うこと。Use when the user wants to review changes in a browser (GitHub-like diff review), review a rendered HTML doc (plan/design doc) in a browser, iterate on fixes with inline comments, or display AI review findings as browser comments (output target: agent-review-kit).

コードの構造や処理の流れ、性能比較を対話型の図で説明し、OpenClawのダッシュボードに指標や表を継続して表示するスキルです。

• コード構造やデータの流れを説明したいとき
• 実測した性能を比較したいとき
• UIの試作を操作して確認したいとき

作成済みの実装計画を、同じセッションでタスクごとに実行します。テストの失敗と成功、進捗や判断を記録し、最後にブランチ全体をレビューするスキルです。

• 作成済みの開発計画を実装したいとき
• 実装用の別エージェントなしで進めたいとき
• 進捗記録から作業を再開したいとき

調査テーマを複数の問いに分け、ウェブ情報の検索と本文の読み込みを通じて、出典・確信度・情報不足を明記したレポートにまとめるスキル。

• 競合や市場動向を調べたいとき
• 導入前に技術を比較したいとき
• 市場規模や成長予測の調査

When to delegate to `cavecrew-investigator` (locate code), `cavecrew-builder` (1-2 file edit) or `cavecrew-reviewer` (diff review) instead of working inline or using `Explore`. Their output is compressed, so main context lasts longer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite UX/UI & Advanced GSAP Motion Engineer. Enforces Python-driven true randomization for layout variance, strict AIDA page structure, wide editorial typography (bans 6-line wraps), gapless bento grids, strict GSAP ScrollTriggers (pinning, stacking, scrubbing), inline micro-images, and massive section spacing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Elite UX/UI & Advanced GSAP Motion Engineer. Enforces Python-driven true randomization for layout variance, strict AIDA page structure, wide editorial typography (bans 6-line wraps), gapless bento grids, strict GSAP ScrollTriggers (pinning, stacking, scrubbing), inline micro-images, and massive section spacing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show a chart, diagram, table, report or mockup inline in this Orca chat as an HTML page. Use when a visual would help the user understand your answer. Only available when the ORCA_CHAT_VISUALS_DIR environment variable is set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or improve documentation for code, APIs, libraries, repositories, or software projects. Supports README generation, API reference documentation, inline code comments, architecture documentation, changelog generation, and developer guides. Trigger on requests like "document this code", "create a README", "generate API docs", "write developer guide", or when analyzing codebases for documentation purposes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid. Also use for everyday subjects with steps, parts, relationships, or states: a leave or travel plan, an application or approval process, a back-and-forth such as renting, where money or documents go, or where an application or order stands. Not for numeric charts or dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when applies to all HTML documents. Check the `<html>` opening tag for a `lang` attribute with a non-empty, valid BCP 47 language code. Also check for `lang` attribute changes on individual elements when the document contains content in multiple languages (inline quotes, foreign terms, multilingual sections). The `lang` attribute is inherited — child elements inherit the language from their nearest ancestor with `lang`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Inline critical CSS for faster rendering. Check the rendered layout across breakpoints and interaction states before proposing a fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a self-contained HTML page (chart, table, diagram, dashboard) to show inline in a thread. Use before calling show_html_page, html_preview or html_render, or whenever an answer reads better as a page than as prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On an explicit planning request, always call `read_skill` for this skill before answering. Research first, then return one concise inline plan; do not create a plan file unless the user explicitly asks or a governing workflow requires one. Start and end the reply by saying this is not a special mode and `go` executes the plan; do not implement in the planning turn. For ordinary implement, build, fix, debug, or refactor requests, work directly. When an explicit plan divides work into separate diffs, commits, or PRs and the user asks to publish, preserve that split and tell the user before deviating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the current diff, or a PR number/branch/path target, for correctness bugs (plus reuse/simplification/efficiency cleanups where the model's review recipe covers them) at the given effort level (low|medium|high|xhigh|max: from few high-confidence findings up to many, some of them uncertain; ultra: deep multi-agent review in the cloud); with no level given, it reuses the level you typed last. Pass --comment to post findings as inline PR comments, or --fix to apply the findings to the working tree after the review. Pass --max-findings <n> to report up to n findings, or --max-findings all for every finding. The choice stays until you pass --max-findings default. For ultra on a GitHub.com PR target, --post asks to post the finished review’s findings to the PR as a single comment from the user’s GitHub account (not a review; the launch dialog still confirms in interactive sessions, while non-interactive mode posts on the flag alone) and --no-post hides that option.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagramming know-how for Artifacts - when a picture earns its place, how to draw one that shows the real mechanism, and the inline-SVG mechanics that keep it legible in both themes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document analysis with inline source screenshots. When you ask Copilot to analyze a document, Eyeball generates a Word doc where every factual claim includes a highlighted screenshot from the source material so you can verify it with your own eyes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。