3,264 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guides SOC 2 Type II Privacy Trust Services Criteria preparation and audit execution. Covers AICPA TSP Section 100 Privacy criteria P1-P8 including notice, choice/consent, collection, use/retention/disposal, access, disclosure, security, and quality. Includes evidence collection, control testing, and report review. Keywords: SOC 2, privacy criteria, TSP, AICPA, Type II, trust services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Social Media Publisher. Takes approved content from outputs/ and schedules it across platforms via Blotato MCP. Generates infographic-style visuals (stat cards, framework diagrams, process graphics, quote graphics) for posts flagged by platform-specialist skills. Requires Blotato MCP to be configured. Run after /linkedin-writer, /threads-writer, /x-writer, or /caption-writer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a structured literature review on a given topic by defining a search strategy, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting key findings, and synthesizing results into a coherent academic review. Use when the user requests literature review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define release criteria, deployment environments, and rollback strategies during PRD v0.8 Deployment & Ops. Triggers on requests to plan releases, define deployment criteria, or when user asks "how do we deploy?", "release criteria", "deployment plan", "rollback strategy", "go-live checklist". Outputs DEP- entries with deployment steps and release criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Socratic spec-refinement front of /feature, and the planning front of /sprint. Routed to BEFORE any code — it turns a one-line idea into a concrete spec with testable criteria, ready for initial combined sprint review or explicit sequential approval. Five gated phases — frame, shape, refine, write, review-and-approve. No implementation before an approved spec; the caller retains required planning, execution and delivery ordering. Each acceptance criterion becomes one tdd Phase 1 obligation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Opt this repo into codeArbiter — scaffold the root-level .codearbiter/ state store.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
微信公众号文章的选题、研究、写作、改稿、审稿与交付工作流。Use when creating, outlining, researching, rewriting, auditing, or packaging Chinese WeChat Official Account articles, 微信文章, 公众号推文, 公众号长文, 热点解读, 干货教程, 观点文, 故事文, 对比测评, 复盘文, 标题摘要, 配图方案, or 微信移动端排版稿. 通用网站 SEO 文章优先使用 writer；LinkedIn 长文优先使用 linkedin-writer；Medium 或英文叙事长文优先使用 medium-writer。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US recruiting and staffing firms — executive search/retained search, RPO, tech/sales/healthcare recruiting, contingent/contract staffing, and temp staffing. Triggers on "find me an executive search firm for a CFO search", "shortlist three retained-search boutiques in NY focused on tech", "we need RPO support for a 50-engineer hiring push", or "pull contact info for these 8 staffing firm domains", even when described indirectly (need help hiring at scale, executive recruiter for senior roles). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip when the user wants to hire someone as their own employee (job-board questions, in-house recruiter hires, "where should I post the role"), individual job-seekers looking for recruiters to represent them, candidate-side career coaching, non-US firms, individual freelance recruiters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative literature-review workflow for a research topic. Use this skill to draft up to 10 search keywords, build a seed set from OpenAlex title-and-abstract matches, expand by backward and forward citations, screen candidates by title and abstract, repeat until no new relevant papers remain, rank the final set, inspect up to 30 full texts, build a concept-reference knowledge graph, and write a literature review grounded only in the final included references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an English Language and Literature Professor — backward-designing a first-year composition or literature syllabus against a shared outcomes rubric, deciding whether an AI-detection or plagiarism flag on a student essay warrants an integrity case, reading where a tenure case's monograph actually sits in a university press's pipeline, or handling a content complaint about an assigned literary text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Eliciting and documenting a sales process before it is built in Salesforce: stage sequencing, entry/exit criteria per stage, win/loss analysis requirements, and stage transition rules. Trigger keywords: sales process design, stage discovery, entry criteria, exit criteria, stage gate, win/loss categorisation, sales methodology, pipeline stages, opportunity stage mapping, stage ladder, probability ladder, forecast category mapping, required fields per stage, stage swim lane, discovery workshop, handoff brief. NOT for configuring OpportunityStage, Sales Processes or Path in Setup — use admin/opportunity-management. NOT for cross-functional swim-lane maps — use admin/process-flow-as-is-to-be.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a task iteratively over a user-specified duration by dispatching subagents. The orchestrator stays strictly linear and time-checked, but each iteration fans out MULTIPLE subagents in parallel over independent units (and those subagents may fan out further). Shared state — a compact progress digest and a growing environment cheatsheet — lives on disk and is passed to every subagent BY REFERENCE, killing the per-subagent rediscovery tax. Every subagent first reads an initialiser preamble that points it at that shared state and makes it write findings back, so the cheatsheet populates itself; role prompts are produced ONCE on the filesystem by a single scaffold command and dispatched by path, never re-typed per dispatch. Subagents persist their results to disk and return only a tiny status, so the orchestrator's context stays small and lasts. The orchestrator classifies the goal as FINITE or OPEN-ENDED: finite lists may finish early; open-ended goals use the full duration, never idle, never manufacture busywork. Use when the user gives a task and a duration and wants it ground out iteratively by subagents over that time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies when task outputs require iteration based on quality signals, unmet requirements, or explicit feedback. Triggers appropriate re-execution strategies. Activate on 'needs iteration', 'retry needed', 'not good enough', 'try again', 'refine output'. NOT for feedback generation (use dag-feedback-synthesizer) or convergence tracking (use dag-convergence-monitor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Einmaliger Tasksolver+Writer+Maintainer-Durchlauf fuer den Projektordner, in dem die Session gerade sowieso gearbeitet hat (inkl. Unterordner) — kein systemweiter Sweep. Loest offene triviale/autonome Register-Punkte, aktualisiert Dokumentation auf den gemessenen Ist-Stand (im Projekt UND in der Root der Pipeline, in der das Projekt liegt) und raeumt Strays/Temp- Dateien nach dem Papierkorb-Prinzip weg. Nutze diesen Skill bei /tidy-up, "raeum das Projekt auf", "mach hier sauber bevor wir weitermachen", am Ende einer Arbeitssitzung an einem Projekt, oder als faellige autonome Aufgabe innerhalb von /work-autonomous + /goal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scores inbound leads against the qualification rubric the user supplies (criteria, scale, weights, thresholds and disqualifiers as given): one DRAFT scorecard per lead with the evidence quoted per criterion, UNKNOWN wherever the lead's information is missing, totals shown with and without the UNKNOWN criteria, a ranked list and a suggested next step such as a qualification call, a request for missing details, nurture or a courteous decline. Use when the user asks to "score these inbound leads", "qualify this lead against our rubric", "run the web form submissions through our lead criteria", "which of these leads should sales call first" or "build a lead scorecard". Do not use for preparing the first call with a lead, use discovery-call-prep instead; for an existing account's growth plan use account-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a DRAFT weighted supplier evaluation matrix from supplier responses and the panel's agreed criteria, weights and scale: a provisional score per cell with the quoted evidence and anchor behind it, a register of every missing or partial answer, and calibration and sensitivity flags. Provisional for panel moderation; never recommends, awards or disqualifies. Use when the user asks to score, weight or rank supplier, bid or tender responses against agreed criteria, for example "score these bids", "build the evaluation matrix", "weight the tender responses" or "rank the suppliers against our criteria". Do not use for a side-by-side comparison without scores, use rfp-comparison-pack instead; for writing the criteria, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ISTQB/JSTQB のテスト計画（test planning）活動を支援するスキル。テスト対象のプロダクトリスク（product risk）を発生可能性×影響度で識別・評価し、それを根拠にテストアプローチ（どこを厚くテストするか）・開始基準（entry criteria）・完了基準（exit criteria）を定めた test-plan.md を作る。「テスト計画を立てて」「テスト戦略を決めたい」「何をどこまでテストすべきか整理して」「リスクベースでテスト範囲を決めたい」と依頼されたときに使う。単発のテスト作成依頼（単にユニットテストを書きたいだけ）は対象外。/test-plan <テスト対象名> で明示的に呼び出されたときのみ使用する。
Identifies when task outputs require iteration based on quality signals, unmet requirements, or explicit feedback. Triggers appropriate re-execution strategies. Activate on 'needs iteration', 'retry needed', 'not good enough', 'try again', 'refine output'. NOT for feedback generation (use dag-feedback-synthesizer) or convergence tracking (use dag-convergence-monitor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
論文や研究計画を共通の評価基準で読み、研究方法、根拠、引用、文章構成を点検するスキル。評価の理由と修正の優先順位、次に直す内容を整理します。
アプリ開発を計画・実装・評価のエージェントに分け、動作中の画面を検証しながら、設定した品質基準に向けて修正を繰り返す開発支援スキル。
AIによる開発の成功条件を実装前に定義し、コード・ルール・モデル・人の評価で新機能と既存機能を確認しながら、複数回の試行から信頼性を記録するスキル。
ブランドの目的や顧客像、語り口を複数回の対話で掘り下げ、回答を保存しながらブランドブックにまとめます。創業者の考えを言語化し、制作担当者への共有に使えます。
When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform. Also use when the user mentions 'ad copy variations,' 'ad creative,' 'generate headlines,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'ad iterations,' 'creative testing,' 'write me some ads,' 'Facebook ad copy,' 'Google ad headlines,' 'LinkedIn ad text,' 'static ads,' 'ad templates,' 'iMessage ad,' 'chat reveal ad,' 'ChatGPT ad,' 'Apple Notes ad,' 'AirDrop ad,' 'creative strategy,' 'creative roadmap,' 'creative retro,' 'hook writing,' 'creative review page,' 'present ad creative for approval,' 'motion video ad,' 'faceless video ad,' 'UGC ad,' 'greenscreen ad,' 'TikTok/Reels ad format,' 'which ad format to make,' 'Meta ad format tier list,' or 'creative format taxonomy.' Use it to produce or iterate ad copy at scale. Copy avoids AI tells like 'it's not X, it's Y' reveals. For campaign strategy and targeting, see ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Protocol-driven study screening for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews. Turns a proposal or PROSPERO protocol into confirmed eligibility rules, then screens titles/abstracts and full texts with two blinded AI reviewers and a third-reviewer adjudicator: ordered exclusion codes, no silent defaults, resumable batch runs, QC (seed studies, near-miss rechecks, kappa and PABAK), PRISMA 2020 counts, EndNote/Zotero RIS groups, an Excel log, a methods draft and a literature_corpus handoff to academic-paper. Reads RIS, PubMed .nbib, Web of Science and CSV exports; removes duplicates. 8 modes: protocol, quick, pilot, ta-screen, ft-screen, adjudicate, audit, report. Use it to screen records against eligibility criteria, pilot screening, resolve screening conflicts, audit exclusions or report the selection process. Triggers on: screen these papers, title/abstract screening, full-text screening, screening conflicts, inclusion criteria, PRISMA flow, غربالگری مقالات, اسکرینینگ عنوان و چکیده, معیارهای ورود و خروج.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。