131 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Post-event analyst note (conferences, KOL events, site visits) with the professional note anatomy — headline verdict, per-stock takeaways with model numbers, KOL distillation, cross-trial comparison lattices, modeled deltas vs consensus (peak × POS), three what's-changed vectors, risk bullets, and materiality-rated conflicting views. Use after any med event to convert the event into actionable takeaways.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Algorithms Researcher. Use when a task calls for Algorithms Researcher judgment. Reasons from separating problem, model, and cost model (comparison, word-RAM, arithmetic, online) through exchange/matroid greedy proofs, subproblem-DAG dynamic programming, max-flow min-cut and Goemans–Williamson primal-dual rounding, Karp–Rabin fingerprinting, competitive ratio and Yao's principle, PTAS/FPTAS (Williamson–Shmoys), and Instance Space Analysis over DIMACS10/MIPLIB 2017/SuiteSparse while treating amortized-versus-average-case conflation, unproven greedy killed by a 4-node counterexample, Monte Carlo without a false-match probability, DIMACS10 suite overfitting, and 'linear time' hiding word-size tricks over bit-length L as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Connects Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other MCP hosts to Writingmate for model discovery, text comparison, image generation, and video generation with Seedance, Sora, Veo, Kling, PixVerse, and other available models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-owned measurement discipline for tracking plans, event and conversion instrumentation, UTM and campaign-parameter hygiene, and verification of what actually fires. Use when setting up, auditing, or repairing analytics across web, product, paid, and lifecycle surfaces. NOT FOR: experiment design or significance decisions (use suede-ab-testing), campaign optimization (use suede-ads), attribution models, model comparison, or cross-tool reconciliation (use suede-attribution), or revenue-process architecture (use suede-revops).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for Codex models/pricing, scheduled tasks, skills, settings, setup, troubleshooting, customization, automations, and self-knowledge—including 'you,' 'your,' 'this app,' or 'this coding agent' when they refer to Codex—and for OpenAI APIs/products and ChatGPT Work. Also use for model choice/migration, prompting, SDKs, Responses, Realtime, agents, evals, and Chat/Work/Codex comparisons. Do not use for generic app/software tasks that merely mention Codex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and runs reproducible evaluations for AI agents, prompts, tools, skills, and model-backed workflows using realistic datasets, isolated baselines, objective assertions, rubric grading, trajectory analysis, cost/latency tracking, and regression comparison. Use when measuring agent quality, optimizing skill triggering, comparing prompts or models, or gating an AI feature release. Not for ordinary deterministic unit tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and benchmark a forecasting model — walk-forward CV, error metrics, baseline comparison. Use when asked "is this forecast any good", "validate a forecasting model", or "backtest the forecast".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for LLM observability in production — token cost tracking, hallucination rate monitoring, latency analysis, prompt/completion logging, model comparison dashboards, and AI-specific tracing (Langfuse, Helicone, Lunary, OpenTelemetry GenAI) / Panduan ahli observabilitas LLM di produksi — pelacakan biaya token, pemantauan tingkat halusinasi, analisis latensi, logging prompt/completion, dashboard perbandingan model, dan tracing khusus AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Financial statements, business segments, dividends, valuation multiples (PE/PB/PS), industry comparison, operating data, corporate actions, company and executive profiles, cross-stock comparison, and valuation ranking via Longbridge. Also: DCF models, value investing screens (low PE/PB, margin of safety), and behavioral finance analysis frameworks. Triggers: "财报", "三表", "利润表", "资产负债", "现金流", "估值", "PE", "PB", "分红", "公司信息", "高管", "行业估值", "并购", "DCF", "内在价值", "低估值", "安全边际", "行为金融", "小盘成长", "专精特新", "主营业务", "业务构成", "收入结构", "业务分析", "是做什么的", "是干嘛的", "公司画像", "行业排名", "行业龙头", "市场份额", "收入占比", "业务结构", "財報", "估值", "分紅", "內在價值", "安全邊際", "主營業務", "業務構成", "收入結構", "行業排名", "行業龍頭", "financial report", "income statement", "balance sheet", "valuation", "dividend", "company info", "industry valuation", "DCF", "value screen", "behavioral finance", "main business", "business composition", "revenue structure", "what does XX do", "industry ranking", "market share", "利潤表", "資產負債", "現金流", "行業估值", "併購", "行為金融", "小盤成長"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, run, and review fair performance, token, and cost comparisons across GitHub Copilot CLI, Codex CLI, and direct model APIs. Use for AI CLI benchmark, Copilot vs Codex, prompt-cache diagnosis, cache read/write analysis, fresh-process latency measurement, token-cost comparison, or when a benchmark must separate provider caching from local CLI caches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design leakage-safe machine learning experiments that mirror real deployment and support fair model comparisons. Use when defining prediction timing, feature eligibility, train-validation-test splits, baselines, metrics, or controlled model iterations; not for auditing whether raw labels are trustworthy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate self-contained HTML/CSS benchmark and comparison charts in an ego-inspired Browser-Native Editorial style. Use for blue-white product metrics, model benchmarks, A/B comparisons, efficiency reports, difficulty breakdowns, and compact technical data panels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate HTML reports and structured metrics from model evaluation results. Creates publication-ready reports with embedded outputs (images, audio, charts) and metrics.json for cross-model comparison. Use when generating reports, writing metrics, creating evaluation summaries, or formatting benchmark results. Triggers on "generate report", "write metrics", "create report", "evaluation summary", "benchmark results", "format results".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bayesian modeling with PyMC. Build hierarchical models, MCMC (NUTS), variational inference, LOO/WAIC comparison, posterior checks, for probabilistic programming and inference.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
実際の開発課題で複数のコーディングエージェントを比較するスキル。成功率、取得可能なAPI費用、所要時間、繰り返し実行の安定性を測り、選定や更新後の評価に使えます。
将来のキャッシュフローを現在価値に換算し、企業価値と1株当たりの評価額を算出するExcelを作成します。前提を変えた再計算やシナリオ比較、感度分析も扱います。
Applies Arbor Hypothesis Tree Refinement to research artifacts with repeatable evaluators, including model training, agent harnesses, data synthesis and benchmark optimization. Uses persistent hypotheses, isolated experiments, evidence propagation and held-out candidate comparison for multi-experiment research runs. Includes a standard-library state manager and guidance for the RUC-NLPIR Arbor CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-product Zoom reference skill. Use after the workflow is clear when you need shared platform guidance, app-model comparisons, authentication context, scopes, marketplace considerations, or API-vs-MCP routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes competitor products and companies by synthesizing data from pricing pages, app store reviews, job postings, SEO signals, and social media into structured competitive intelligence. Produces feature comparison matrices scored across 12 dimensions, SWOT analyses, positioning maps, UX audits, pricing model breakdowns, action item roadmaps, and stakeholder presentation templates. Use when conducting competitor analysis, comparing products against competitors, researching the competitive landscape, building battle cards for sales, preparing for a product strategy or roadmap session, responding to a competitor's new feature or pricing change, or performing a quarterly competitive review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Zero-context verification that every number, comparison, and scope claim in the paper matches raw result files. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with NO prior context to prevent confirmation bias. Use when user says "审查论文数据", "check paper claims", "verify numbers", "论文数字核对", or before submission to ensure paper-to-evidence fidelity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill covers applied microeconomic empirical methods and research design. Use when the user is selecting an identification strategy, comparing estimators, running diagnostics, designing a research study, or evaluating an empirical strategy. Triggers on "which method", "what estimator", "how to choose", "method comparison", "empirical strategy", "research design", "applied micro", "identification strategy", "power analysis", "design-based", "model-based", "minimum detectable effect", "specification".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。