「model comparison」の検索結果

Use when the user asks about finding the best, top, or recommended model for a task, wants to know what AI model to use, or wants to compare models by benchmark scores. Triggers on: "best model for X", "what model should I use for", "top models for [task]", "which model runs on my laptop/machine/device", "recommend a model for", "what LLM should I use for", "compare models for", "what's state of the art for", or any question about choosing an AI model for a specific use case. Always use this skill when the user wants model recommendations or comparisons, even if they don't explicitly mention HuggingFace or benchmarks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about finding the best, top, or recommended model for a task, wants to know what AI model to use, or wants to compare models by benchmark scores. Triggers on: "best model for X", "what model should I use for", "top models for [task]", "which model runs on my laptop/machine/device", "recommend a model for", "what LLM should I use for", "compare models for", "what's state of the art for", or any question about choosing an AI model for a specific use case. Always use this skill when the user wants model recommendations or comparisons, even if they don't explicitly mention HuggingFace or benchmarks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-model benchmark for gstack skills. Runs the same prompt through Claude, GPT (via Codex CLI), and Gemini side-by-side — compares latency, tokens, cost, and optionally quality via LLM judge. Answers "which model is actually best for this skill?" with data instead of vibes. Separate from /benchmark, which measures web page performance. Use when: "benchmark models", "compare models", "which model is best for X", "cross-model comparison", "model shootout". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "compare models", "model shootout", "which model is best".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a coherent, whole-paper mathematical modeling solution framework from a complete contest problem. Use after the user supplies a CUMCM or other modeling problem and asks for modeling ideas, an overall solution plan, question-by-question analysis, candidate-model comparison, model-selection reasons, innovations, validation, or cross-question linkage. For every question, explain the task and mathematical essence, compare multiple feasible models in tables, recommend a route with explicit reasons, and keep all questions connected through shared data, variables, parameters, constraints, and validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opinionated Bayesian modeling workflow with PyMC and ArviZ. Contains critical guardrails (nutpie sampler, prior/posterior predictive checks, LOO-PIT calibration, prior sensitivity checks, 94% HDI, non-centered parameterizations, reproducible seeds) that agents won't apply unprompted — always consult before writing Bayesian model code. Trigger on: building probabilistic/Bayesian models, prior elicitation, MCMC inference, convergence diagnostics (divergences, R-hat, ESS), model comparison (LOO-CV, ELPD, stacking weights), hierarchical/multilevel models, count regressions, logistic regression with uncertainty, prior sensitivity analysis, reporting Bayesian results, or mentions of PyMC, ArviZ, InferenceData, credible intervals, posterior distributions, shrinkage, uncertainty quantification. Also trigger for model comparison, diagnosing sampling problems, choosing priors, or presenting stats to non-technical audiences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare several Japanese NLP libraries, models, or datasets for a keyword (a specific tool name, or a function/task like '形態素解析') across a handful of criteria chosen for that comparison, rendered as a ○/△/✕ table. Use when the user wants a side-by-side comparison of multiple Japanese NLP tools/libraries/datasets, not just the single best one. Trigger phrases include 'X と Y と Z を比較して', '形態素解析ライブラリを比較', 'MeCab と Sudachi どっちがいい', 'どのツールを使うべき', 'compare japanese tokenizers', 'mecab vs sudachi vs janome', 'which embedding model should I use', '日本語NERライブラリの比較表', 'pros and cons of japanese OCR tools'. For a single ranked list use search; for alternatives to one specific tool (or contribution candidates) without a multi-axis table, use discover.

Regression analysis, ANOVA, generalized linear models, Bayesian methods, and model selection. Covers the full modeling workflow from problem formulation through diagnostics -- linear regression, logistic regression, Poisson regression, mixed-effects models, prior specification, posterior inference, AIC/BIC comparison, cross-validation for model selection, and assumption checking. Use when fitting models, testing hypotheses, or selecting among competing statistical explanations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a 'model comparison grid' video from a config — a fal-style "same prompt, N contenders" showcase — a dark real-DOM stage where per beat a monospace prompt fades in centered, docks to a small top strip, then a labeled 2-4 panel grid (static images OR muted video clips, mixable per cell) staggers in and holds for comparison, plus a minimal end card — frame-stepped via Playwright (video cells are frame-seeked deterministically) and encoded with FFmpeg. Deterministic assembly, FREE (cell media comes from create-image-fal / create-video-fal, music from create-music-elevenlabs), text stays pixel-crisp. Use for the model-comparison-grid format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing Scenario models on the same brief through MCP: a bake-off with shared prompts and inputs, cost, generation time and quality measured side by side, choosing a default model, testing a new release against the incumbent, or finding which model handles a style, edit, or reference image best. Keywords: model comparison, benchmark, bake-off, A/B test, contact sheet, cost per asset, latency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to send the same prompt to several LLMs and compare the answers - sequentially (stopwatch, clean per-lane timing) or in parallel (true race), with optional repetitions per model, judged by the starting model across quality, correctness, completeness, instruction fidelity and latency (time is only one dimension). Triggers on /compare-race, 'model race', 'vergleiche modelle', 'gleicher prompt an mehrere modelle'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

大規模言語モデルの知識・推論・コード生成を共通の課題で評価するスキル。複数モデルの比較表や学習途中の成績推移を作り、評価結果と個別の回答を保存します。

• MMLU・GSM8Kでのモデル評価
• 複数モデルの比較表作成
• 学習途中のモデルの成績追跡

Fits and diagnoses Python statistical models including OLS, GLM, discrete and mixed models, ARIMA and SARIMAX. Supports coefficient inference, marginal effects, model comparison and time series forecasting with explicit design and uncertainty checks. Used for econometrics and statistical modeling; for guided test selection with APA reporting, see statistical-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Bayesian phylogenetic analysis with MrBayes, BEAST2, RevBayes, and PhyloBayes including MCMC convergence diagnostics and model comparison. Use when needing posterior probability support, Bayesian model averaging, site-heterogeneous models for deep phylogenies, or formal model comparison via stepping-stone sampling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fit cognitive drift-diffusion models (Ratcliff DDM) to reaction time and accuracy data with parameter estimation (drift rate, boundary separation, non-decision time), model comparison, and parameter recovery validation. Use when modeling binary decision-making with reaction time data, estimating cognitive parameters from experimental data, comparing sequential sampling model variants, or decomposing speed-accuracy tradeoff effects into latent cognitive components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and checks Bayesian models with PyMC, including hierarchical models, NUTS MCMC, variational inference, mutable-data predictions, posterior predictive checks, diagnostics, and PSIS-LOO model comparison. Use for probabilistic modeling and uncertainty inference in PyMC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate trained machine learning models with the right metrics and comparison logic. Use for benchmark review, threshold selection, calibration, validation, and model comparison; not for feature engineering or leakage auditing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add file-based observability, tracing, and run analysis to LLM/agent experiments — per-turn transcripts, tool calls and results, reasoning traces, token/cost accounting, per-episode artifacts, plus terminal viewers and a run-comparison report. Platform-agnostic: one small adapter covers OpenAI, Gemini/Vertex, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Tinker, vLLM, or any custom inference stack, and the same tooling then works unchanged. Use this skill whenever the user wants observability, tracing, logging, or run tracking for model experiments; asks why an agent failed a task or wants to replay/debug/diff an episode; wants to compare models, arms, or ablations; wants to instrument a new folder, repo, or platform ("add observability here", "do the same for Tinker/Gemini/OpenAI"); wants to import or tie in existing experiment results so old runs show up alongside new ones; or wants eval runner scripts where many models share one protocol. Reach for this even when they only say "log what the model is doing", "I can't tell what happened in this run", or "set up traces for this experiment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to compare or benchmark multiple LLMs/agents arena-style but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — a general-purpose win-rate comparison on a custom task, or a benchmark specifically about reference/citation hallucination rate. Also use when the user mentions model arena, agent arena, pairwise model comparison, win-rate ranking, or comparing models on a task and hasn't specified whether that task is generic or about citation accuracy. This skill is the entry router for the arena-eval suite: it asks one diagnostic question when needed, then recommends the workflow or workflows needed to cover the request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically evaluate and compare multiple AI models or agents without pre-existing test data. Generates test queries from a task description, collects responses from all target endpoints, auto-generates evaluation rubrics, runs pairwise comparisons via a judge model, and produces win-rate rankings with reports and charts. Supports checkpoint resume, incremental endpoint addition, and judge model hot-swap. Use when the user asks to compare, benchmark, or rank multiple models or agents on a custom task, or run an arena-style evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement overlay — version the WHOLE deployable LLM-app artifact as one bundle: prompts + compiled programs + model snapshot pins + retrieval config + eval-set version, versioned together so a deploy is reproducible and rollback is atomic. Activate when preparing to deploy an LLM app, when asking "what exactly is running in prod right now?", when a deploy must be reproducible months later, or when an incident needs a clean rollback. The core reframe: an LLM app artifact is NOT an ML model — it is a manifest over many independently-mutable parts, not one weights file. Do NOT activate for one-off prompt edits with no deploy, for a single-component demo, or where a vendor owns the whole prompt lifecycle. For versioning ONE compiled prompt use [[agentsop-per-model-artifacts]]; for the CI comparison mechanism use [[agentsop-regression-gate]]. Search keywords: prompt versioning, reproducible deploy, what is running in prod, rollback LLM app, model pinning, prompt registry, version prompts and config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the operator wants two or more model conditions (Opus 5, Fable 5.1, Sol) compared on one source head and one prompt, or wants a harness change that must serve more than one model. Covers the condition design that separates harness quality from solver capability, the recorded-evidence join, the reading of each bucket, and the rule under which a change is admitted for every model rather than one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tracks cumulative LLM costs across DAG execution and makes real-time decisions to stay within budget. Downgrades models, skips optional nodes, or stops early when cost exceeds thresholds. Use when managing execution budgets, analyzing cost breakdowns, or optimizing model routing for cost. Activate on "cost budget", "too expensive", "reduce cost", "cost optimization", "model downgrade", "budget exceeded". NOT for LLM model selection logic (use llm-router), pricing comparisons across providers, or billing/invoicing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。