58 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Compares two Prof datasets (GPU vs NPU / NPU vs NPU) by auto-installing and calling msprof-analyze compare, then parses the result xlsx into HTML report and Chinese xlsx. Invoke when user provides two prof dirs to compare, or has a compare result xlsx to analyze/translate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户提供 MindStudio profiler 采集的性能数据（框架 profiler、msprof 命令行）时，对数据完整性、采集状态及关键配置进行校验，确保后续分析工具能正常运行。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
分布式训练梯度尖刺 (Gradient Spike) 根因定位。基于梯度监控数据 (trend.db/CSV)、 msprobe dump 统计数据，三阶段渐进式从异常坐标定位逐层深入到算子级根因。 当用户明确指明分析梯度尖刺问题时使用此 skill。 即便用户提供以上数据，但未指明分析梯度尖刺问题时，不可使用此skill。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Partner, channel, and ecosystem marketing for B2B SaaS — and the design of the partner program itself. Use this skill for co-marketing with technology alliances and channel partners, integration launches, joint campaigns and content, partner tiering and enablement, cloud-marketplace go-to-market (AWS, Azure, GCP listings, private offers, committed-spend drawdown), and for channel program architecture: whether to launch a partner program at all, which motions to run (referral, technology, services/SI, reseller), partner unit economics, margin and SPIF design, partner recruitment and certification ramp, and the rules of engagement that settle a contested deal. Also triggers on: partner marketing, co-marketing, channel, reseller, VAR, MSP, distributor, OEM, alliance, ecosystem, integration launch, marketplace listing, AWS Marketplace, private offer, MDF, joint webinar, co-branded, channel conflict, rules of engagement, deal registration, partner program design, should we build a partner program, partner economics, partner P&L, partner CAC, margin stacking, SPIF, rebate, partner recruitment, partner onboarding, partner certification, partner tiers, our partners signed up and never sold anything.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Predicts whether a DNA variant alters mRNA splicing using sequence-based deep-learning tools — SpliceAI (10kb context dilated CNN, clinical default), Pangolin (multi-tissue), MMSplice (modular per-region CNN with calibrated ΔPSI), SpliceTransformer/TrASPr (tissue-aware transformers), SpliceVault (empirical 300K-RNA lookup of likely mis-splicing outcomes), CADD-Splice (composite score). Applies the ClinGen SVI 2023 framework for ACMG/AMP variant interpretation (PVS1, PP3, BP4 evidence codes), HGVS splicing nomenclature (c.123+1G>A, c.123-3T>G, r.spl?), extended-window scoring for deep-intronic pseudoexons, tissue-specific predictions, branchpoint variant detection (BPHunter, LaBranchoR), and splice-switching ASO design. Use when interpreting splice impact of clinical variants, prioritizing VUS, identifying deep-intronic pathogenic variants, or designing ASOs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Predicts whether a DNA variant alters mRNA splicing using sequence-based deep-learning tools — SpliceAI (10kb context dilated CNN, clinical default), Pangolin (multi-tissue), MMSplice (modular per-region CNN with calibrated ΔPSI), SpliceTransformer/TrASPr (tissue-aware transformers), SpliceVault (empirical 300K-RNA lookup of likely mis-splicing outcomes), CADD-Splice (composite score). Applies the ClinGen SVI 2023 framework for ACMG/AMP variant interpretation (PVS1, PP3, BP4 evidence codes), HGVS splicing nomenclature (c.123+1G>A, c.123-3T>G, r.spl?), extended-window scoring for deep-intronic pseudoexons, tissue-specific predictions, branchpoint variant detection (BPHunter, LaBranchoR), and splice-switching ASO design. Use when interpreting splice impact of clinical variants, prioritizing VUS, identifying deep-intronic pathogenic variants, or designing ASOs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about hazardous materials (hazmat) transportation under 49 CFR 171-180 — placarding requirements, segregation tables, hazmat employee training (49 CFR 172 Subpart H), Hazmat Safety Permit (HMSP), shipping papers, packaging groups, emergency response phone, security plans, hazmat endorsement on CDL, and bulk vs non-bulk distinctions. Cite specific 49 CFR section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
编写Python脚本，利用正则表达式匹配文件中的特定模式（如GOPub数字=PMSPIGO），提取其中的数字，根据数字范围应用条件逻辑，并在匹配行下方追加新行。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced API exploitation methodology focused on business logic abuse and sophisticated attack patterns that bypass traditional security controls. Covers business logic bypass through API call chaining and workflow manipulation. Addresses GraphQL-specific attacks including batching for credential brute-force, query depth exploitation, and introspection abuse. Includes pagination exploitation for data exfiltration, webhook hijacking for SSRF and data interception, and resource exhaustion through algorithmic complexity attacks. Covers race conditions in API transactions using parallel request techniques. Provides comprehensive JWT manipulation including algorithm confusion, kid injection, jku/x5u abuse, and claim tampering. Details API key leakage detection across source repositories, client-side code, and error messages. Covers undocumented endpoint discovery through predictable naming, debug routes, and source map analysis. Tooling includes Arjun, ParamSpider, jwt_tool, and GraphQL Voyager. Designed for a...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。