「multi-source」の検索結果

Use when verifying information (fact, number, quote, event, statement) against authoritative primary sources, or cross-checking a number via one-level metric decomposition (Z = P × Q). Triggers: "verify X", "is this true", "find the original source", "where is this number from", "two sources disagree", "is it true X never did Y". Covers five scenarios: (1) basic truthfulness check, (2) completeness / out-of-context quoting, (3) one-level reasoning verification, (4) negative-statement handling, (5) multi-source conflict side-by-side output. Dig into whitelisted primary sources only (user-supplied files, official websites & databases, authoritative industry sources); cited reports / charts / datasets must be downloaded and read locally to count as verified — if download is blocked, hand the link to the user. If nothing can be found, plainly state "cannot verify" rather than guessing, patching, or citing secondary paraphrases. Always reply in the user's question language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source comprehensive research using perplexity-researcher, claude-researcher, and gemini-researcher agents. Launches up to 10 parallel research agents for fast results. USE WHEN user says 'do research', 'research X', 'find information about', 'investigate', 'analyze trends', 'current events', or any research-related request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep, iterative, multi-source research that explores a topic from multiple perspectives, detects contradictions, and produces a comprehensive vault note with fact-level citations and a confidence map. Use this skill whenever the user says /deep-research, "deep research X", "research X thoroughly", "investigate X deeply", "I need to really understand X", or wants research that goes beyond a quick web search. Also use when the user wants to understand a complex, contested, or multi-faceted topic, compare competing approaches with evidence, or build a comprehensive mental model they can trust for decisions. This is heavier than /research — it searches web, academic papers, Reddit, and the vault, then loops through exploration and critique rounds until the evidence base is solid. When in doubt between /research and /deep-research, prefer this one if the topic is complex, contested, or the user wants depth over speed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source research on a customer question or topic with source attribution. Use when a customer asks something you need to look up, investigating whether a bug has been reported before, checking what was previously told to a specific account, or gathering background before drafting a response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run multi-source web research with adversarial verification and produce a cited report: decomposes the question into 3-6 distinct queries (broad, specific, comparative, recency-anchored), searches and ranks sources by authority, recency, and specificity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered revenue intelligence: sales call insight extraction, content-to-revenue attribution, and multi-source client reporting. Use when asked to analyze sales calls, build revenue attribution models, or generate client reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Citation format and verification protocol for legal documents that draw on Bates-stamped source records. Defines the bracket citation format, multi-source citation rules, quotation handling, the verification pass that runs before output, and the [UNVERIFIED] flag protocol. Use this skill any time another skill produces a legal work product that cites Bates-stamped pages, including medical chronologies, deposition summaries, demand letters, case briefs, and discovery responses. Also use any time the user asks how to format a citation or verify that a claim is supported by the source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep multi-source technical research with citations — tech evaluation, ecosystem/standards comparison. NOT for API docs (mk:docs-finder), codebase discovery (mk:scout), or project Q&A (mk:ask-me).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional network graph analyst identifying Gladwellian superconnectors, mavens, and influence brokers using betweenness centrality, structural holes theory, and multi-source network reconstruction. Activate on 'superconnectors', 'network analysis', 'who knows who', 'professional network', 'influence mapping', 'betweenness centrality'. NOT for surveillance, discrimination, stalking, privacy violation, or speculation without data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive framework for analyzing crypto tokens — market data, liquidity health, tokenomics, unlock schedules, and risk assessment. Combines on-chain data, API queries, and multi-source validation to generate actionable investment verdicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce comprehensive synthesis with explicit citations from multiple ordinary public-web sources via the Tavily CLI. Use for detailed reports, comparisons, market or literature research, and questions whose answer requires multi-source web evidence rather than a quick lookup. Do not use for simple discovery (tavily-search), one known URL (tavily-extract), one-site URL discovery or bulk extraction (tavily-map/crawl), or research centered on named social, community, career, code, media, authenticated, or cross-platform sources (Agent Reach). Takes 30-120 seconds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct comprehensive AI-powered research with citations via the Tavily CLI. Use this skill when the user wants deep research, a detailed report, a comparison, market analysis, literature review, or says "research", "investigate", "analyze in depth", "compare X vs Y", "what does the market look like for", or needs multi-source synthesis with explicit citations. Returns a structured report grounded in web sources. Takes 30-120 seconds. For quick fact-finding, use tavily-search instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route ordinary public-web information tasks to the correct Tavily CLI operation. Use when the task concerns publicly accessible webpages and needs web discovery, clean extraction, URL mapping, same-site crawling, or public-web-only research, but the exact Tavily operation is not yet clear or several operations must be sequenced. Prefer the specific leaf skill when intent is clear: tavily-search for discovery without a URL, tavily-extract for known URLs, tavily-map for URL/site-structure discovery, tavily-crawl for content from many pages on one site, tavily-research for cited multi-source synthesis, and tavily-dynamic-search for programmatic filtering with context isolation. Do not use for named social/community/media/career/code platforms, login or cookie-dependent content, platform-native discussions, or cross-platform collection; use Agent Reach there. Do not use for local files, Git operations, deployments, or ordinary code editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates the enrichment of raw indicators of compromise with multi-source threat intelligence context using SOAR platforms, Python pipelines, or TIP playbooks to reduce analyst triage time and standardize enrichment outputs. Use when building automated enrichment workflows integrated with SIEM alerts, email submission pipelines, or bulk IOC processing from threat feeds. Activates for requests involving SOAR enrichment, Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, TheHive, Python enrichment pipelines, or automated IOC processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build collaborative forensic incident timelines using Timesketch to ingest, normalize, and analyze multi-source event data for attack chain reconstruction and investigation documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with multi-source intelligence; or making block/monitor/whitelist decisions. Activates for requests involving VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, MalwareBazaar, MISP, or IOC enrichment pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Correlate events across multiple log files from different sources, systems, or time periods. Build unified timelines, identify causal relationships between events, and highlight anomalies that span multiple data sources. Supports timezone normalization and gap detection. Use when analyzing logs from multiple systems (frontend, backend, database, infrastructure), investigating distributed system failures, or building event timelines across services. Triggers: "correlate these logs", "build timeline from multiple logs", "cross-system analysis", "find related events across logs", "multi-source log analysis", "distributed trace analysis"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform comprehensive, multi-source research on any topic using AI-powered web search and analysis. Covers deep_research for broad discovery and semantic_content_search for site-specific knowledge retrieval. Use when you need to research brands, markets, competitors, or trends with citations — before creating content, planning campaigns, or making strategic decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source research synthesizer. Takes a question, runs 3-5 parallel web searches with varied phrasings, deduplicates, and returns a cited, concise answer. For Hebrew questions, searches in both Hebrew and English. Output is always under ~400 words.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Tavily's multi-source research workflow for comparisons, market analysis, literature-oriented exploration, or detailed cited reports. Use only when bounded search and extraction are insufficient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces thorough, multi-source cited research reports from web and news without paid APIs. Use when the user asks for deep research, landscape analysis, competitive intel, market research, or a cited report needing broad source coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive investigation of complex multi-domain narratives (technology, theology, policy, finance). Systematically decouples factual claims from speculation through iterative verification, multi-source comparison, and contradiction resolution. Use for investigations requiring institutional knowledge, historical context, and handling of conflicting incentives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。