「multi-source」の検索結果

Foundry IQ knowledge bases. WHEN: make local or Blob documents searchable; create/diagnose KBs; triage unsupported connectors or multi-source KB creation/reconfiguration; connect existing KB to agents (including multi-source KBs); create/reuse a Search service; retrieve from an existing knowledge base with citations; no brand words needed. Read its procedure before query/target questions. NOT: other KB providers, repository-file search, classic Azure AI Search index/query/app work, generic agent creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundry IQ knowledge bases. WHEN: make local or Blob documents searchable; create/diagnose KBs; triage unsupported connectors or multi-source KB creation/reconfiguration; connect existing KB to agents (including multi-source KBs); create/reuse a Search service; retrieve from an existing knowledge base with citations; no brand words needed. Read its procedure before query/target questions. NOT: other KB providers, repository-file search, classic Azure AI Search index/query/app work, generic agent creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs multi-source research across GitHub, HN, Reddit, arXiv, and Semantic Scholar. Use when surveying a technical topic across multiple channels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Portable multi-source research with cross-source validation and an offline evidence ledger. Use for fact-checking, comprehensive research, or any question requiring multiple independent perspectives; work with the host agent's search tools and optionally add SandBase Tavily, Exa, Scholar, and Cloudsway coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrate multiple source findings into an attributed synthesis or comparison. Use for combine these summaries, synthesize results, merge findings or multi-source analysis. Preserve claim-level provenance, coverage, qualifiers, conflicts and uncertainty rather than repeatedly compressing narrative summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct deep, multi-source research by cross-referencing data from web search, news, social media, academic sources, and proprietary databases. Enforces APA 7th citations, evidence hierarchy, and 2-cycle verification per research theme. Built for competitive intelligence analyst workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete automated literature discovery pipeline: multi-source search → six-dimension scoring → fine reading → formatted delivery → archival. Combines a configurable engine with daily cron-driven application layer. Works with Feishu, Telegram, or any messaging platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build collaborative forensic incident timelines using Timesketch to ingest, normalize, and analyze multi-source event data (including Plaso output) for attack chain reconstruction and investigation documentation. Use when reconstructing the sequence of events during an incident investigation or when multiple analysts need to jointly tag, annotate, and search a shared DFIR timeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy MISP via Docker and configure feeds from sources like abuse.ch, AlienVault OTX, and CIRCL to aggregate, correlate, and distribute threat intelligence, including automated feed synchronization and STIX/TAXII-based integration with Splunk, Elasticsearch, and SOAR platforms. Use when standing up centralized IOC management or wiring multi-source threat feeds into a SIEM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates the enrichment of raw indicators of compromise with multi-source threat intelligence context using SOAR platforms, Python pipelines, or TIP playbooks to reduce analyst triage time and standardize enrichment outputs. Use when building automated enrichment workflows integrated with SIEM alerts, email submission pipelines, or bulk IOC processing from threat feeds. Activates for requests involving SOAR enrichment, Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, TheHive, Python enrichment pipelines, or automated IOC processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with multi-source intelligence; or making block/monitor/whitelist decisions. Activates for requests involving VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, MalwareBazaar, MISP, or IOC enrichment pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research skill powered by NotebookLM MCP. Conducts structured multi-source research (market analysis, competitive intel, trend analysis, prospect research) using Google NotebookLM as the research engine, then delivers formatted briefs and optional studio artifacts (slides, audio podcasts, videos, infographics, reports, mind maps).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query decomposition and multi-source search orchestration. Breaks natural language questions into targeted searches per source, translates queries into source-specific syntax, ranks results by relevance, and handles ambiguity and fallback strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source research on a customer question or topic with source attribution. Use when a customer asks something you need to look up, investigating whether a bug has been reported before, checking what was previously told to a specific account, or gathering background before drafting a response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research agent skill. Use when the user needs thorough, scientific, truth-seeking research on any topic -- investigating claims, finding primary sources, synthesizing evidence, producing cited reports. Triggers on: 'research this', 'investigate', 'deep dive', 'find sources', 'what does the evidence say', 'literature review', 'fact check', 'analyze the research on', any request requiring multi-source investigation with citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent web research with mandatory URL verification, confidence-tagged output, and four depth modes (quick to deep investigation). USE WHEN research, do research, quick research, extensive research, deep investigation, find information, investigate, extract alpha, analyze content, retrieve content, AI trends, enhance content, extract knowledge, web scraping, YouTube extraction, map landscape, competitive analysis, find it, find this, find this product, identify this, what is this, what's that thing, track down, locate, help me find, I can't find X online, can't find it online, source this — never substitute raw WebSearch/WebFetch for a multi-source find/identify/investigate request. NOT FOR people/company/entity deep background, academic papers (use ArXiv), JSON entity extraction, or content-adaptive wisdom extraction (use ExtractWisdom).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ahrefs API analyst (extension). Reads referring domains, backlinks, organic keywords, and content explorer data via the tested @ahrefs/mcp@0.0.11 server. Pairs with seo-backlinks for multi-source confidence weighting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find, verify, and synthesize scientific literature — from "what's the seminal paper for X" through full multi-source reviews. Covers grounding claims in real retrieved sources, avoiding fabricated citations, handling retractions, and calibrating confidence to evidence strength.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks Codex to research, find learning materials, process "素材：" links, "请你读" / "精读" a material, build a material radar, or use multi-source information retrieval for career learning and Agent infra tracking. Do not use the career/Agent-infra routing bias for user-directed `整理笔记` into a named note.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research with hyperresearch, for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. Use when the user asks for deep research, a research report, a literature review, or a multi-source analysis with verified citations. Checks that the hyperresearch CLI is installed, sets it up in the current project for the agent you are running in, then hands off to the hyperresearch pipeline (a tier-adaptive 16-step pipeline with a persistent source vault). Not for quick lookups one or two searches can answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct enterprise-grade research with multi-source synthesis, citation tracking, and verification. Use when user needs comprehensive analysis requiring 10+ sources, verified claims, or comparison of approaches. Triggers include "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", or "analyze trends". Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qianfan Deep Research Agent for complex research tasks. Combines information retrieval, multi-source analysis, content synthesis, and report generation. Use when user needs in-depth research, analysis reports, or comprehensive investigation on complex topics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive clinical laboratory data harmonization for multi-source healthcare analytics. Convert between US conventional and SI units, standardize numeric formats, and clean data quality issues. This skill should be used when you need to harmonize lab values from different sources, convert units for clinical analysis, fix formatting inconsistencies (scientific notation, decimal separators, whitespace), or prepare lab panels for research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。