「quality-audit」の検索結果

Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, publish readiness, or 内容质量/EEAT评分. Runs 80-item CORE-EEAT scoring with veto checks and fix plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accessibility (a11y) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible". Do NOT use for SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive site audits covering multiple areas (use web-quality-audit) and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit launch readiness; report ship/no-ship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a read-only, actionable audit of Python code quality, modernization, maintenance burden, ecosystem opportunities, or Pythonic design across a PR, git diff, staged/unstaged changes, files, or directories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, and best practices. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Study a merged or shipped tdmcp implementation and extract reusable learnings: code improvements, runtime/UX lessons, test gaps, docs updates, roadmap items, and harness changes. Use when the user asks to learn from a completed feature/project/PR/build, analyze what can be improved from an implementation, or turn a real installation experience into actionable tdmcp improvements. This is a post-implementation learning harness; it does not replace tdmcp-pipeline for building or tdmcp-quality-audit for broad repo audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit memory retrieval quality (drift, staleness, citation-groundedness) and produce remediation backlog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit data quality across six DAMA DMBOK dimensions — Completeness, Accuracy, Consistency, Timeliness, Validity, Uniqueness. Produces a scored data quality report with issue log and remediation plan. Use when profiling datasets, onboarding new data sources, or building data quality gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks cyclomatic complexity, nesting, long methods, god classes, method signatures, O(n²), N+1 queries, constants management. Returns findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a comprehensive code quality audit covering security, performance, and maintainability. Use for quarterly audits, pre-release reviews, or when onboarding to a large codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit our social presence" or "is this batch safe to publish"; runs either the typed ECHO asset gate or a separate program-maturity profile, with channel-truth, claim, disclosure, manipulation, UGC-rights, and denominator checks. Not for creator deliverables — use creator-content-auditor; not for launch readiness — use launch-readiness-auditor. 社媒资产门/运营成熟度/发布前放行

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build our social posting calendar", "set weekly slots and queue depth per channel", or "plan the evergreen recycle rotation"; produces the always-on brand calendar — pillar allocation with hero/hub/help balance and give:ask targets (all labeled Estimated starting heuristics to calibrate against own analytics, never scored rules), per-channel recurring slots with queue depth, a batching workflow, an evergreen recycle cycle with freshness re-checks, deliberate open slots for realtime/trend moments fed by trend-spotter go/skip verdicts, and first-comment/publish-order ops — cadence commitments filed to the channel registry, and no batch ships to the queue without a SHIP verdict from social-quality-auditor pre-publish mode. Not for repurposing an existing asset or the paid-amplification calendar — use content-amplifier. 社媒排期/内容日历/栏目配比/常青循环复用

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run the weekly social readout", "which denominator does our engagement rate use", or "which posts won this week and what changes next cycle"; produces the organic-social metric dictionary (every rate names its denominator — ERR engagement-by-reach vs ERI by-impressions vs ER-by-follower — locked across periods), median-not-mean per-post rollups with organic and boosted separated, EMV as labeled exec-translation only (never inside any score), an attributed CHAOSS/Orbit-style community-health readout with employees excluded, and the best/worst-performer write-back the next calendar cycle consumes. Not for dollar-ROI math or the ECHO profile result gate verdict — use roi-calculator and social-quality-auditor. 社媒周报/互动率分母/指标字典/复盘回写

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "generate subject line variants", "pre-score my subject lines", or "will this subject get truncated / trigger spam filters"; produces a labeled subject + preheader variant set and a per-variant heuristic pre-score card — spam-trigger flags, length/truncation across desktop + mobile, emoji-count, and the inbox preview render (from-name + subject + preheader) — before any test is run. Not for the body copy or CTA — use email-creative-builder; not for the A/B test design or significance read — use send-experiment-designer; not for the profile-weighted EQS or the S1/S2/N1/D1 vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件主题行生成/主题行预打分/截断与垃圾词检查

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a win-back campaign", "re-engage lapsed subscribers", "run a re-permission / re-consent sweep", or "sunset my dead list"; produces a closed-loop reactivation program — a lapsed-cohort definition, a staged offer ladder, a re-consent (re-permission) capture step, and a sunset-confirm / suppression rule. Owns none of the SEND-N sub-item notes: engagement-decay / sunset is email-sequence-designer's and preference-center / frequency options is preference-frequency-manager's — this skill references those notes, it does not re-emit them. Not for the general lifecycle flows (welcome/cart/post-purchase) — use email-sequence-designer; not for the preference-center / opt-down ladder — use preference-frequency-manager; not for the consent record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or the N1 veto — use email-quality-auditor. 流失召回/重新授权/沉默用户清理

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a preference center", "set up a frequency opt-down ladder", "give people a step-down instead of unsubscribe", or "design a topic/cadence preference page"; produces a preference-center field spec, a frequency/topic opt-down ladder (down-tier paths that substitute for a hard unsubscribe), a preference-to-suppression mapping, and a SEND N-dimension sub-item note on preference-center / frequency options offered. Not for the lifecycle flow map or cadence governance — use email-sequence-designer; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or ruling the N1 unsubscribe veto — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件偏好中心/降频阶梯设计/退订替代降档

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan how our narrative lands on every surface", "write per-surface message-match specs", or "brief each creative builder from the canon"; maps the narrative-registry canon onto every flagship surface (homepage, pricing, store listing, sales deck, social bio, docs, email) as a per-surface message-match spec — what claim, pillar, proof, and objection reframe each surface must carry — and cuts a handoff brief to each discipline's creative builder (content-writer, ad-creative-builder, email-creative-builder, social-creative-builder, message-house-builder), so the same story lands consistently everywhere. Not for writing the finished surface copy — use each discipline creative builder; not for the tier-scoped launch asset manifest — use launch-asset-packager; not for scoring cross-surface consistency — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 叙事落地/逐面消息一致/创意交接简报/画布传导

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build email segments from my list", "make engaged / lapsed / RFM segments", "set up cart-abandoner or lifecycle-stage audiences", or "build a suppression list of unsubscribes and bounces"; turns the user's OWN list/CRM/GA4/ecommerce export into behavioral, attribute, and lifecycle-stage segments plus a suppression list, with per-segment sizes labeled Measured/Estimated, informing the SEND E (Engagement/targeting) dimension. Not for scoring EQS or running vetoes — use email-quality-auditor; not for authentication or spam-content checks — use deliverability-qa. 邮件列表分群/生命周期分群/抑制名单/流失召回

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "watch my list health over time", "flag decaying / unengaged subscribers on a schedule", "why is my open rate drifting down / bounces creeping up", or "build me a re-permission and prune worklist"; runs the scheduled SEND list-decay + suppression-drift watch — an engagement-recency cohort read (30/90/180/365-day), hard-bounce and spam-complaint trend vs benchmark, suppression-list growth/leakage check, and a segmented re-permission / sunset / prune worklist tied to SEND S (list hygiene) and E (engagement-decay) sub-items. Not for the one-time pre-send authentication pre-flight — use deliverability-qa; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing the EQS or enforcing vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件列表健康度监控/退订漂移/沉睡用户清理

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to record/query the brand narrative canon, tagline, message hierarchy, voice/naming rules, or a canon re-version; curates complete versioned canon events through the append-only narrative stream and derived views. Not for TALE scoring — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for authoring the system — use message-system-architect. 品牌叙事台账/canon 记录/语气与命名规范

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build programmatic SEO pages", "generate pages at scale", "rank on a high-authority third-party site", "borrow domain authority", "build a vs / alternative page", "do local SEO", "optimize a Google Business Profile", or "fix NAP" — one page-build router with four modes: programmatic (template × dataset systems), parasite (barnacle publishing on Medium/Reddit/LinkedIn/GitHub), comparison (vs / alternative pages in four formats), and local (GBP + NAP + citations + location pages), each with its own thin/duplicate, honesty, or reputation-abuse guardrail. Not for finding what to target — use keyword-research or content-gap-analysis; not for drafting one standalone article — use content-writer; not for scoring a page for publish — use content-quality-auditor. 程序化SEO/批量页面/寄生SEO/借势权重/对比页/vs页/替代页/本地SEO/谷歌商家档案/NAP一致性

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit on-page SEO" or "diagnose why a single page dropped"; scores titles, meta, header structure, keyword placement, links, and images with prioritized fixes. Not for E-E-A-T / publish-readiness scoring — use content-quality-auditor; not for crawl / CWV / indexing — use technical-seo-checker. 页面SEO审计/排名诊断

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。