「questioning」の検索結果

Applies the dialectical reasoning and intellectual humility of Socrates (ancient Greek philosopher, 470-399 BCE). Use this skill whenever the user is grappling with fundamental definitions, moral dilemmas, educational approaches, self-reflection, or making high-stakes ethical decisions. Trigger this skill when encountering topics like virtue, justice, the pursuit of truth, questioning assumptions, coaching, or when the user seems overly confident in unexamined beliefs. It helps dismantle false assumptions through probing questions and redirects focus toward the "care of the soul" and objective truth over external validation or material success.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the philosophical frameworks of Martha Nussbaum (American philosopher, capabilities approach, University of Chicago) to evaluate justice, human welfare, and ethical dilemmas. Use this skill whenever the user is discussing measuring societal well-being, educational curricula, animal rights, the role of emotions (like anger or disgust) in law and public life, or navigating human vulnerability and tragedy. Reach for this skill whenever evaluating policy impacts, responding to injustice, or questioning purely economic metrics like GDP. It shifts the focus to what people are actually able to do and be.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the philosophical frameworks of Friedrich Nietzsche (19th-century German philosopher, author of Thus Spoke Zarathustra). Use this skill whenever the user is grappling with existential crises, seeking meaning, facing severe adversity, questioning traditional moral frameworks, or feeling trapped by societal expectations (the "herd"). Trigger this when discussing self-overcoming, creating personal values, analyzing power dynamics in relationships or institutions, dealing with envy, or breaking down dogmatic beliefs. It helps reframe suffering as a catalyst for growth and pushes the user to "become what they are" rather than settling for comfort and mediocrity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the empiricist, skeptical, and practical reasoning of David Hume, 18th-century Scottish philosopher. Use this skill whenever you encounter questions about epistemology, causality, human nature, moral philosophy, political authority, or the limits of rational knowledge. Trigger this skill when the user is grappling with abstract theories that need grounding, evaluating causal claims, discussing the role of emotion vs. reason in decision-making, or questioning the legitimacy of institutions. Even if the user doesn't name Hume, apply his frameworks (like Hume's Fork or the Impression Test) to cut through metaphysical speculation, ground arguments in observable experience, and recognize that reason is ultimately guided by human sentiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uncover root causes through recursive Why questioning and consequence exploration. Use before acting on problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured pre-design questioning to surface hidden constraints before any architecture decision is locked in. Forces the architect/auditor/reviewer to enumerate what they DON'T know before proposing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifying YAGNI, cutting scope, and proposing complexity reductions. A 'subtraction' agent questioning the justification for every feature, dependency, doc, and config. Does not write code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test a half-formed idea in a questioning conversation, with different personas probing its weak points, until the user can act on it or drop it with confidence. Optionally writes a short brief for planning skills to build on. Use when the user says 'forge an idea', 'pressure-test this idea', 'stress-test my thinking', or 'harden this idea'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate elaborative interrogation prompts that deepen encoding through targeted why and how questions. Use when students memorise without understanding or need deeper processing of content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a checking-for-understanding protocol with specific techniques for each lesson stage. Use when planning systematic comprehension checks during explicit or direct instruction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check an educational practice or task for cultural bias, WEIRD assumptions, and cross-cultural validity. Use when adapting resources for diverse contexts or questioning universal claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic tutor that teaches codebase understanding through questioning, challenges, and active recall. Invoke with /learn-codebase when onboarding to a new codebase or deepening understanding of existing code. Maintains a learning journal that tracks mastery and schedules reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic questioning partner named Gadfly for deep learning through dialogue. Use this skill when the user wants to learn, understand, or explore a topic through questions rather than explanations. Trigger when the user says "teach me about...", "help me understand...", "I want to learn...", "ask me questions about...", "quiz me", "Socratic method", "Gadfly", or wants to deeply understand something through dialogue rather than passive reading. Also trigger when the user provides a text or document and wants to be questioned about it, or wants to check their own understanding of a concept.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-cognitive and practical strategies for learning any language -- learner autonomy, goal setting, strategy taxonomy (Oxford's SILL framework), memory strategies, cognitive strategies (note-taking, summarizing, analyzing, reasoning), compensation strategies, metacognitive strategies (planning, monitoring, evaluating), affective strategies (managing anxiety, self-encouragement), social strategies (collaboration, questioning, empathy), immersion design, study habit optimization, plateau diagnosis, and motivation maintenance. Use when designing a language learning plan, diagnosing a learner's stuck points, selecting study methods, or building self-directed learning skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and diagnoses list experiments (the item count technique), covering whether indirect measurement is warranted, control-list construction against floor and ceiling effects, design variants, estimators and assumption tests in the list package, and power planning for the precision penalty. Use when the user measures a sensitive attitude or behavior and asks about list experiments, item count, unmatched count, or veiled questioning, or has an implausible prevalence estimate. Deciding whether sensitivity bias exists at all goes to survey-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test a half-formed idea in a questioning conversation, with different personas probing its weak points, until the user can act on it or drop it with confidence. Optionally writes a short brief for planning skills to build on. Use when the user says 'forge an idea', 'pressure-test this idea', 'stress-test my thinking', or 'harden this idea'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conversational design ideation agent that researches trends, explores visual directions, and refines ideas through adaptive questioning — then produces a rich PRD document and auto-generates Stitch screens. Your design buddy that thinks deeply before designing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide a person in developing active listening skills. AI coaches receptive mindset preparation, full-presence attending, reflective paraphrasing, clarifying questioning, synthesis of understanding, and integration of insights into communication practice. Use when a person wants to improve communication, when someone keeps misunderstanding others or feels misunderstood, when preparing for a difficult conversation such as a feedback session or conflict resolution, or when a person notices they talk more than they listen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** — Structured context analysis before acting. USE FOR: questioning assumptions, mapping dependencies, identifying blind spots, validating scope of any task or subject. Use to contextualize, question, analyze before implementing, review premises, prevent hallucination, structured assessment. DO NOT USE FOR: simple tasks where task-intent suffices, direct implementation, code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic questioning protocol + user communication. MANDATORY for complex requests, new features, or unclear requirements. Includes progress reporting and error handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CEO/founder-mode scope review. Challenges the scope of any plan, workflow, or feature before execution. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream bigger), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (cherry-pick worthwhile expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor within current scope), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use before executing any multi-step workflow or when questioning whether the scope is right. Prevents scope creep and missed opportunities. Use proactively when the user defines a plan, creates a workflow, or says "is this enough?" or "am I thinking too small?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. Use AFTER a plan exists. For validating the idea itself before planning, use /mk:office-hours first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform rough ideas into solid designs through structured questioning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。