Parallel research agent orchestration dispatching 5-10 concurrent agents for comprehensive multi-source research with synthesis and validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
146 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Parallel research agent orchestration dispatching 5-10 concurrent agents for comprehensive multi-source research with synthesis and validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs multi-source research across GitHub, HN, Reddit, arXiv, and Semantic Scholar. Use when surveying a technical topic across multiple channels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Use when the user needs thorough investigation, market research, technical deep-dives, due diligence, or comprehensive analysis on any subject.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deterministic deep research via RivalSearchMCP. 9 tools: 5-engine web search (DuckDuckGo/Bing/Yahoo/Mojeek/Wikipedia), 9-platform social search (Reddit/HN/StackOverflow/Dev.to/Medium/ProductHunt/Bluesky/Lobste.rs/Lemmy), 5-source news (Google/Bing/Guardian/GDELT/DDG), 5 academic DBs (OpenAlex/CrossRef/arXiv/PubMed/EuropePMC), GitHub search, website mapping, content extraction with OCR, and research topic synthesis. No API keys required. Use when the user needs web research, competitive analysis, content discovery, or academic paper search.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides user research and research ops. Use when running interviews, usability tests, surveys, or synthesis to de-risk product decisions; not experiments or review mining.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds repeatable deep-research workflows for verified synthesis. Use when producing evidence-backed briefs, comparisons, dossiers, or research pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Searches and discovers academic papers across multiple sources (Semantic Scholar, arXiv, Tavily, Exa, Gemini deep research, AMiner, Google Scholar) with adaptive engine selection based on query type. Returns ranked, deduplicated results with metadata (authors, venue, year, citations, abstract, PDF link). Use when the user asks to find papers / literature / publications / preprints / references on a topic, search for related work, look up a specific paper by title or DOI or arXiv ID, find papers by an author, find recent SOTA / state-of-the-art work, survey a research area, or run a deep / comprehensive literature search with synthesis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build structured ICP documentation by scraping case studies, testimonials, and solutions pages from your website. Produces firmographics, champion + economic buyer personas, pain points, decision criteria, anti-ICP, customer proof points, and voice-of-customer synthesis. Writes to marketing/icp/ICP.md as the canonical ICP every downstream skill reads. Triggers - "icp research", "ideal customer profile", "persona research", "customer segments", "who are our customers", "build ICP"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert research analyst specializing in comprehensive information gathering, synthesis, and insight generation. Masters research methodologies, data analysis, and report creation with focus on delivering actionable intelligence that drives informed decision-making.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research best practices and synthesize into design decisions for artifact creation. Invoke BEFORE any creator skill to ensure research-backed decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search academic papers and conduct literature reviews using OpenAlex API (free, no key needed). Use when the user needs to find scholarly papers by topic/author/DOI, explore citation chains, get structured paper metadata (title, authors, abstract, citations, DOI, open access URL), fetch full text of open access papers, or conduct automated literature reviews with theme identification and synthesis. Triggers on requests involving academic search, paper lookup, citation analysis, literature review, research synthesis, or scholarly reference gathering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic literature review methodology for social science research. Use when conducting systematic reviews, research synthesis, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, or comprehensive literature searches across economics, political science, sociology, education, public health, and development. Produces structured notebook cells with search strategy, evidence table, thematic synthesis, and gap analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce comprehensive synthesis with explicit citations from multiple ordinary public-web sources via the Tavily CLI. Use for detailed reports, comparisons, market or literature research, and questions whose answer requires multi-source web evidence rather than a quick lookup. Do not use for simple discovery (tavily-search), one known URL (tavily-extract), one-site URL discovery or bulk extraction (tavily-map/crawl), or research centered on named social, community, career, code, media, authenticated, or cross-platform sources (Agent Reach). Takes 30-120 seconds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Tavily's multi-source research workflow for comparisons, market analysis, literature-oriented exploration, or detailed cited reports. Use only when bounded search and extraction are insufficient.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when user requests research requiring multiple sources, comprehensive analysis, or synthesis across topics - technical research, domain knowledge gathering, market analysis, or learning about complex subjects
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
学術・技術文献を検索し、選定基準に沿って比較・統合するスキルです。検索履歴や除外理由を残し、根拠の強さと引用を確認したレビューにまとめます。
Orchestrate multi-phase deep research with web search, memory retrieval, pattern matching, and synthesis into structured findings
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies Arbor Hypothesis Tree Refinement to research artifacts with repeatable evaluators, including model training, agent harnesses, data synthesis and benchmark optimization. Uses persistent hypotheses, isolated experiments, evidence propagation and held-out candidate comparison for multi-experiment research runs. Includes a standard-library state manager and guidance for the RUC-NLPIR Arbor CLI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize user research into themes, insights, and recommendations. Use when you have interview transcripts, survey results, usability test notes, support tickets, or NPS responses that need to be distilled into patterns, user segments, and prioritized next steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize repeated themes from selected research conversations or notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three-layer bias analysis on any URL, file, or text — auto-fetches the content and any cited study, then audits data-level biases, source conflicts of interest, and journalism-added distortions, separating what the data supports from what's editorialized. USE WHEN bias analysis, analyze bias, bias check, check this study, who funded this, is this source biased, fact-check article, methodological flaws, source credibility, what's wrong with this claim. NOT FOR psychological author analysis, research synthesis (use Research), entity due diligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for AI deep research — methodology, source evaluation, search optimization, cross-referencing, synthesis, and citation formats
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
External research synthesis from Trail of Bits, SlowMist, ConsenSys, Immunefi, and Cyfrin. Use this for advanced audit methodology, Echidna/Medusa fuzzing setup, Slither custom detector writing, attack pattern deep dives, or the 4-phase learning roadmap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when generating higher-level synthesis notes such as literature reviews, comparison matrices, project summaries, or other cross-note summaries inside the project knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。