「reviewer」の検索結果

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Data Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, data and AI governance risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CDO review", "pressure-test the data governance in this plan", "what would a CDO say about this", "check the metric definitions and data sources" or "prepare this for the data governance board". Do not use for security controls or third-party security risk, use ciso-reviewer instead; for contract, liability or regulatory terms, use general-counsel-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Marketing Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to specific passages, marketing risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CMO review", "pressure-test the positioning", "what would a CMO say about this", "challenge the launch plan" or "check the messaging and audience". Do not use for price economics, margins or payback, use cfo-reviewer instead; for sales pipeline mechanics, use cro-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as an Investor archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict whose conditions read as terms, findings that cite the exact passage, capital-allocation risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run an investor review", "what would an investor say about this", "pressure-test the capital case" or "prepare me for the investment committee". Do not use for internal budget, cost or finance-function review, use cfo-reviewer instead; for revenue forecast and pipeline, use cro-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or rollout plan in character as a Works Council Representative archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, employee-impact risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "review this as the works council would", "what would the works council say about this rollout", "prepare me for the staff council consultation", "find the employee-impact gaps in this plan" or "pressure-test this deck from the employee representative side". Do not use for people strategy, restructuring or HR policy, use chro-reviewer instead; for whether frontline staff will adopt or work around the change, use frontline-skeptic-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck, pricing plan, go-to-market plan or forecast in character as a Chief Revenue Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to exact passages, revenue risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CRO review", "pressure-test the revenue plan", "what would sales leadership say about this" or "challenge this forecast". Do not use for partnership, deal-structure or market-positioning reviews, use cbo-reviewer instead; for the finance seat use cfo-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cursorでレビュー親を実行するnative入口。共有reviewer Skillを読み、対象・担当配分・結果集約を親が行う。

Working playbook preloaded into the reviewer helper; the coach updates its Lessons after each round. Use only when acting as reviewer or coaching it. NOT for writing a verifier brief (use subagent-dispatch).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

7-agent paper review system on Hermes Agent. 6 modes (full/re-review/quick/methodology-focus/guided/calibration). 5-panel review with editorial decision, revision roadmap, and calibration metrics. Uses delegate_task for each reviewer. Triggers: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, check revisions, calibrate reviewer, 審稿, 同儕審查, 論文審查.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

機能の実装後やマージ前に、別のエージェントへコードレビューを依頼します。変更内容と要件、対象のコミットを渡し、指摘の重要度に応じて修正を進めるスキルです。

• 大きな機能を実装した後のレビュー
• マージ前に変更を確認したいとき
• 複雑な不具合修正への第三者確認

実在するファイルや行番号を参照した段階的なコード案内をCodeTour形式で作成し、新任者の学習、設計の理解、PRレビュー、障害原因の調査に役立てるスキル。

• 新しい保守担当者向けのコード案内
• 設計や機能の処理経路を理解したいとき
• PRの変更を順番にレビューしたいとき

Analyze git diffs for risk scoring, reviewer recommendations, and change classification. Use when preparing a PR, reviewing a large or cross-module change, or before merging to assess risk and pick reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protocol-driven study screening for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews. Turns a proposal or PROSPERO protocol into confirmed eligibility rules, then screens titles/abstracts and full texts with two blinded AI reviewers and a third-reviewer adjudicator: ordered exclusion codes, no silent defaults, resumable batch runs, QC (seed studies, near-miss rechecks, kappa and PABAK), PRISMA 2020 counts, EndNote/Zotero RIS groups, an Excel log, a methods draft and a literature_corpus handoff to academic-paper. Reads RIS, PubMed .nbib, Web of Science and CSV exports; removes duplicates. 8 modes: protocol, quick, pilot, ta-screen, ft-screen, adjudicate, audit, report. Use it to screen records against eligibility criteria, pilot screening, resolve screening conflicts, audit exclusions or report the selection process. Triggers on: screen these papers, title/abstract screening, full-text screening, screening conflicts, inclusion criteria, PRISMA flow, غربالگری مقالات, اسکرینینگ عنوان و چکیده, معیارهای ورود و خروج.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to create CodeTour .tour files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: "create a tour", "make a code tour", "generate a tour", "onboarding tour", "tour for this PR", "tour for this bug", "RCA tour", "architecture tour", "explain how X works", "vibe check", "PR review tour", "contributor guide", "help someone ramp up", or any request for a structured walkthrough through code. Supports 20 developer personas (new joiner, bug fixer, architect, PR reviewer, vibecoder, security reviewer, and more), all CodeTour step types (file/line, selection, pattern, uri, commands, view), and tour-level fields (ref, isPrimary, nextTour). Works with any repository in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Serves as a reviewer of the codebase with instructions on looking for Apple App Store optimizations or rejection reasons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever you need the allowed_tools / skills preset for a sub-agent role before calling spawn_subagent. Trigger especially when user mentions: "role", "spawn_subagent", "allowed_tools", or any OMP role name (executor, architect, analyst, critic, security-reviewer, code-reviewer, qa-tester, planner, explore, debugger, verifier). Also use when a /ultrawork, /ralph, /autopilot, /ultraqa, or /team workflow step asks for role tool/skill configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating an approachable, self-contained HTML review aid for a pull request; explaining what changed, why it matters, how it works, and how it fits into the broader system; turning PR diffs, commits, tests, and architecture context into a local `.pr-review/` HTML page for reviewers; or helping reviewers understand complex code changes without dumping the full diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts a markdown PR writeup or code review (one with ```diff fenced blocks and severity-tagged > [!BLOCKER]/[!MAJOR]/[!MINOR]/[!NIT] callouts) into a single-file 2-column HTML review — unified-diff on the left, severity-tagged annotation cards on the right, top jump-nav listing every finding, mandatory named reviewer footer. Triggers when the markdown-html-orchestrator classifies an input as REVIEW, or when invoked directly via /cs:md-review. Refuses without explicit --reviewer (a code review must name a human), refuses if no diff hunks present (route to md-document instead), and refuses to encode severity in color only (every badge ships color + icon + aria-label per WCAG 1.4.1). Use after orchestrator routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or extend an E2E journey spec in evals/specs that proves a PR's change to a human reviewer. Use when a PR changes user-visible behaviour, when a reviewer asks "show me", or when the coverage decision says a journey is missing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convex code reviewer — security, auth, validators, performance, and pattern checks for code in a convex/ directory. Use to review or audit Convex functions before shipping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over a Claude Code skill until a review comes back clean, with a cross-round findings ledger, escalation when fixes stop converging, and a mechanical scope guard. Reviews are performed by the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent. Use to fix skill quality issues, iteratively refine a skill, or resume a loop after an escalation ('fix my skill', 'improve this skill until it passes review', 'skill improvement loop'). NOT for a one-time review — use the plugin-dev skill-reviewer agent directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement reviewer feedback on a Canva design. Reads all comment threads, synthesises what reviewers want, makes the clear-cut changes directly, and flags anything that needs a human decision. Use when the user asks to "implement feedback on my deck", "address comments on a design", "apply review feedback", "fix the comments on my presentation", or "implement the feedback".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviewer rejection workflow and strict lockout semantics

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。