「score」の検索結果

Score a website's AI answer-engine visibility 0–100 against the open AIV rubric, and, with the user's own API keys, check and track through the OpenAI, Perplexity, Gemini and Anthropic APIs whether AI engines actually cite it. Use when the user wants to know whether AI engines can find, parse, trust and cite their site, or whether they do. Triggers on: 'does ChatGPT cite us', 'AI citation rate', 'share of voice in AI answers', 'track AI visibility weekly', 'AIV', 'AI visibility', 'GEO audit', 'generative engine optimization', 'AEO', 'llms.txt', 'will AI cite my site', 'AI search ranking', 'get cited by ChatGPT'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates structured hiring scorecards for any role. Takes job title, requirements, and team context. Generates comprehensive scorecard with weighted scoring rubric, interview questions per competency, evaluation matrix, red/green flags, and reference check questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score and filter topics for X content creation using weighted criteria. Use when user wants to evaluate collected materials, filter topics by score, or mentions "filter topics", "score materials", "x-filter", "选题筛选". Applies 10-point scoring system with customizable weights.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates executive reporting and visualization from RoPA data including processing activity counts, risk heatmaps, compliance scores, trend analysis, and supervisory authority readiness indicators. Activate for RoPA dashboard, executive reporting, risk heatmap, compliance score, trend analysis, board reporting, KPI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AccountScore integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with AccountScore data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kaggle-first end-to-end competition workflow for scored submissions. Use when Codex must run Kaggle or competitive ML workflows through scored submission, including code competitions, validation, metrics, policy-safe public notebook/discussion intel, tabular/text/image modeling, tuning, ensembling/stacking, proactive multi-notebook architectures, producer notebooks that train models and export private Kaggle artifact datasets, downstream consumer notebooks, Kaggle GPU offload, kagglehub access, hidden-test debugging, and public score retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative rubric-based evaluation and self-improvement loop. Builds a scoring rubric interactively, evaluates an artifact with multiple models in parallel (Codex, Gemini, Claude), then autonomously improves the artifact one criterion at a time until a score threshold is met or circuit breaker fires. "/rulph", "rubric evaluate", "rubric score", "multi-model evaluate", "score and improve", "evaluate and iterate", "grade this", "루브릭 루프", "채점 루프", "자율 개선", "개선 루프", "루브릭 평가"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kaggle-first end-to-end competition workflow for scored submissions. Use when Codex must run Kaggle or competitive ML workflows through scored submission, including code competitions, validation, metrics, policy-safe public notebook/discussion intel, tabular/text/image modeling, tuning, ensembling/stacking, proactive multi-notebook architectures, producer notebooks that train models and export private Kaggle artifact datasets, downstream consumer notebooks, Kaggle GPU offload, kagglehub access, hidden-test debugging, and public score retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs skill that lints a local music or media release folder and scores it for release readiness: missing files, weak or malformed metadata, artwork and stem problems, split gaps, rights blockers, and platform-delivery issues, produced by a bundled offline script as a scored markdown and JSON report. Use when a creator has one or more release folders of tracks, artwork, and stems and wants to know what is missing before distributing, delivering, or handing it off; when metadata quality or a delivery rejection is the question; or when a release-readiness score is asked for. Reports what is present, missing, or unknown; never upgrades unknown to confirmed and never means legal clearance. NOT FOR: organizing the evidence behind a rights or split gap the report surfaces (use suede-rights-audit); building the transfer package (use suede-rights-passport); a sync one-sheet (use suede-sync-packaging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate any agent skill against a merged framework — Anthropic's Claude Code best practices plus Matt Pocock's writing-great-skills methodology — across 4 axes (Trigger, Structure, Steering, Pruning). Produces an evidence-cited scorecard (0–100), a weighted overall score, and diagnosed failure modes with prioritized fixes. Use when the user asks to evaluate, rate, or audit a skill ("evaluate this skill", "skill scorecard", "review SKILL.md"), or to compare two skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep analysis of Amazon niche markets by product ASIN, covering monopoly level, brand concentration, new product success rate, and market opportunity score. Trigger when the user mentions niche market analysis by ASIN, ASIN market research, ASIN niche lookup, monopoly assessment, brand concentration analysis, new product success rate, market demand score, competitive landscape, Amazon sub-market exploration, ASIN niche analysis, niche by ASIN, monopoly level, brand concentration, new product success rate, market opportunity score, competitive landscape, Nexscope data. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "niche market" or "ASIN", if their need involves evaluating the competitive landscape, brand density, or opportunity potential of the niche segment a specific product ASIN belongs to, this skill should also be triggered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep analysis of Amazon niche markets by keyword, covering monopoly level, brand concentration, new product success rate, and market opportunity score. Trigger when the user mentions niche market analysis, keyword market research, monopoly assessment, brand concentration analysis, new product success rate, market demand score, competitive landscape, Amazon sub-market exploration, niche market analysis, keyword market, monopoly level, brand concentration, new product success rate, market opportunity score, competitive landscape, Nexscope data. Even if the user does not explicitly mention "niche market", if their need involves evaluating the competitive landscape, brand density, or opportunity potential of the Amazon market at the keyword dimension level, this skill should also be triggered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional PDF financial plan generator. Scans current working directory for FINANCE-*.md files, extracts scores and financial data, then runs the bundled Python ReportLab script to produce a polished, client-ready PDF with cover page, Financial Health Score gauge, score breakdown, cash flow, debt, retirement, portfolio, and prioritized action plan. Output: FINANCE-PLAN.pdf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score candidate CVs on a 100-point scale against a Job Description. Use this skill when the user wants to evaluate, score, rank, or screen candidate CVs/resumes against a JD. Also trigger when the user mentions 'review CV', 'screen resume', 'rate candidates', 'shortlist', or any context involving matching resumes to job requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert 5-dimension design critique — philosophical, scored, actionable. Use when asked to "critique this design", "expert review", "score my design", "how does this look", "is this good design", "design feedback", or "review this UI". Different from /form-audit (which is technical QA for consistency/compliance) — form-critique evaluates design as a craft object: philosophy, hierarchy, execution, function, and innovation each scored 0–10 with a punch list. Add "as a report" or "give me a visual report" to produce an HTML file with SVG radar chart, evidence cards, and Keep/Fix/Quick-wins action lists — useful for design reviews and stakeholder presentations instead of CLI output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a single skill's quality against its stated purpose. Classifies the skill's purpose type, then scores applicable quality categories — universal dimensions always apply; structural dimensions (scripts, references, assets) are scored only when warranted by the skill's purpose. A focused 20-line behavioral skill with no bundled resources scores fully on all applicable categories. Use when auditing skill quality, checking marketplace readiness, evaluating skill completeness, performing pre-publication evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate semantic + keyword match score. Compares resume content against job description to calculate a fit score and identify gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the marketing harness quality gates on content. Scores Four U's (Unique/Useful/Ultra-specific/Urgent), checks for banned words and AI slop, runs SEO lint for search content. Use when "score this", "quality check", "run quality gates", "check this content", "four u's score", "banned word check", "SEO lint", or any request to validate content quality before publishing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rates any SKILL.md on a 0-100 scale across 10 dimensions with a SHIP / REWORK / SCRAP verdict. Evaluates trigger precision, instruction clarity, output predictability, edge case coverage, anti-hallucination guardrails, developer experience, composability, open-source readiness, wow factor, and real-world utility. No flattery — calibrated against Anthropic's own skill-creator rubric. Use this skill whenever someone says "score this skill", "rate my skill", "is this skill good", "skill review", "skill audit", "roast my SKILL.md", "grade this", "will this skill work", "evaluate my skill", "how good is this", or pastes a SKILL.md and asks for feedback. Also trigger when comparing two skills, benchmarking a skill collection, or asking "what's wrong with this skill" — even without the word "score".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores and strengthens startup pitch decks (pre-seed through Series A) against 35 investor-grade criteria grounded in Sequoia, DocSend, YC, a16z, and Carta data. Use when the user has shared a pitch deck (PDF, PPTX, markdown, pasted slide text, or a link to one) and asks for a review, score, feedback, or critique. A full review takes about 15–25 minutes, 40 or more for a long investor deck, so for a general pitch question with no deck, answer briefly in chat and offer the review instead of starting it. When it runs, score with the rubric, never with deck advice from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and scores Claude Projects using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics and detects seven structural anti-patterns. When global layer info is provided, adds cross-layer alignment findings. Use when user says "audit my project," "review my custom instructions," "score my project," "evaluate my Claude project," "improve my system prompt," "what's wrong with my project," "why is my project underperforming." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my project doesn't work right," "Claude is inconsistent in my project," "my Project used to work and now doesn't." Also use when the user pastes Custom Instructions asking why output is poor or generic. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is a global-layer audit (use rootnode-global-audit if available), single-prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available), or Memory-only optimization (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Append a DiT-tuning round to history.yaml. DiT-side counterpart of the LLM-path accuracy_append.py; records practice.md5, inference_outputs, fp_baseline_outputs, and the scoring fields (scores / overall_score / loss_vs_baseline / is_satisfied) populated by quant-tuning-score-dit. Idempotent on practice_id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Watchlist Manager — build, maintain, and score a dynamic watchlist with Quick Scores (0-100), alert system (breakouts, breakdowns, earnings approaching, volume spikes), and ranked display. Triggered by "trade watchlist", "trade watchlist add/remove/rescore/alerts/top".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score for .NET methods, classes, or files. Use when the user asks to assess test quality, identify risky untested code, compute CRAP scores, or evaluate whether complex methods have sufficient test coverage. Requires code coverage data (Cobertura XML) and cyclomatic complexity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests, general test execution unrelated to coverage/CRAP analysis, or general code coverage reporting without CRAP context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。