「severity」の検索結果

Creates structured bug reports for defects found during Oracle-to-PostgreSQL migration. Use when documenting behavioral differences between Oracle and PostgreSQL as actionable bug reports with severity, root cause, and remediation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before submitting (blocking issues + dead code) vs what to leave for the actual review. Report-only — does not edit files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy and operationalize Amazon GuardDuty, covering protection plans for S3, EKS, EC2 runtime monitoring, and Lambda, interpreting finding severity, and building automated response with EventBridge and Lambda. Use when establishing threat detection for AWS accounts, investigating findings on compromised instances or credential abuse, or building automated incident-response playbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a vulnerability aging dashboard and SLA tracking system that measures time-to-remediation against severity-based deadlines (e.g. 14 days critical, 30 days high, 60 days medium, 90 days low), with automated escalations and compliance metrics reporting. Use when designing SLA policies, building aging/remediation dashboards, or proving compliance with remediation timelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build structured communication templates for malware incidents (ransomware, wiper, trojan, worm), covering internal stakeholder notifications, executive briefings, technical advisories for IT teams, customer notifications, and regulatory disclosures, with severity-based escalation procedures. Use when drafting or standardizing incident communications and notification workflows for a malware outbreak.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review content against your brand voice, style guide, and messaging pillars, flagging deviations by severity with specific before/after fixes. Use when checking a draft before it ships, when auditing copy for voice consistency and terminology, or when screening for unsubstantiated claims, missing disclaimers, and other legal flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan codebases for technical debt, score severity, track trends, and generate prioritized remediation plans. Use when users mention tech debt, code quality, refactoring priority, debt scoring, cleanup sprints, or code health assessment. Also use for legacy code modernization planning and maintenance cost estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user wants to convert any markdown file in their Claude project into a single-file, lightly-interactive HTML — long-form documents (specs, plans, RFCs, reports, explainers), code reviews with diffs and severity-tagged annotations, or slide decks. Triggers on "convert this markdown to HTML", "make this an HTML file", "turn this into an interactive document", "render this report as HTML", "PR writeup as HTML", "slides from this markdown". Forks context to route to one of three converter sub-skills (md-document, md-review, md-slides) based on a deterministic doctype classifier, after the user has run the design-system onboarding once. Refuses if input is under 100 lines (per Shihipar — markdown still wins below the threshold) or design-system isn't onboarded. Distinct from Anthropic's official Playground plugin (which is interactive prompt-tuning controls with sliders/knobs/prompt-copy-back) and from marketing/landing/ (which is a landing-page generator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive incident response framework from detection through resolution and post-incident review. Battle-tested SRE/DevOps practices: severity classification, timeline reconstruction, structured post-incident analysis. Use when declaring an incident, coordinating multi-team response during an outage, leading a post-mortem, or setting up on-call practices for a new service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured bug report from a description, or analyze code for potential bugs. Reproduction steps, severity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-evaluate open bugs — priority vs severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends. Run when the count grows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for security alert triage in Google SecOps. Use when investigating and triaging security alerts, determining false positives vs. true positives, assessing entity risk, adjusting alert severity or priority, and closing or escalating alerts and cases. Don't use for deep multi-hop incident investigations across host timelines (use secops-investigate), proactive threat hunting or retroactive IoC sweeps (use secops-hunt), or authoring new detection rules (use secops-detection-engineering).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The 15-minute escalation-routing runbook for the Plain support queue — detecting SLA breaches against {{sla_targets}}, VIP accounts in {{vip_accounts}}, and high severity, routing each qualifying ticket to the right team, opening a linked issue in {{linear_team}} when engineering is needed, and posting the alert to {{escalation_channel}}. Never closes a ticket or promises a resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial analysis deploying parallel expert agents to stress-test ideas, strategies, and plans — decomposes into atomic claims, attacks them, then steelmans and counter-argues, producing severity-ranked findings with remediation. USE WHEN red team, attack idea, counterarguments, critique, stress test, devil's advocate, find weaknesses, break this, poke holes, strongest objection. NOT FOR collaborative debate to find best path (use Council).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an authorized security issue for validity, severity, and a remediation plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-pass triage of a possible production incident for Superset's hosted services. Gathers signals (recent deploys, Sentry spikes, health checks), proposes a severity and a status.superset.sh message, then stops for human approval. Use when someone reports an outage, errors spike, or asks "is something down?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage a GitHub issue into something actionable — reproduce the claim, find duplicates, judge severity, and apply labels, milestone, and assignee. Use when the user asks to triage an issue, sort the backlog, deal with new issues, check whether a bug is already reported, or says "what should we do with this issue".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies security vulnerabilities, generates structured audit reports with severity ratings, and provides actionable remediation guidance. Use when conducting security audits, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or analyzing infrastructure security. Invoke for SAST scans, penetration testing, DevSecOps practices, cloud security reviews, dependency audits, secrets scanning, or compliance checks. Produces vulnerability reports, prioritized recommendations, and compliance checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan package manifests and lockfiles for outdated and vulnerable dependencies. Classify by severity and update type.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the attack-path-analysis phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to trace a security finding from source to sink and calibrate severity. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。