「threat」の検索結果

Systematically collects, categorizes, and distributes indicators of compromise (IOCs) during and after security incidents to enable detection, blocking, and threat intelligence sharing. Covers network, host, email, and behavioral indicators using STIX/TAXII formats and threat intelligence platforms. Activates for requests involving IOC collection, indicator extraction, threat indicator sharing, compromise indicators, STIX export, or IOC enrichment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Correlates disparate security incidents, IOCs, and adversary behaviors across time and organizations to identify unified threat campaigns, attribute them to common threat actors, and extract shared indicators for improved detection. Use when multiple incidents exhibit overlapping indicators, when sector-wide attack campaigns require cross-organizational analysis, or when building campaign-level intelligence products. Activates for requests involving campaign analysis, incident clustering, cross-organizational IOC correlation, or MISP correlation engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and deploy a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) by integrating open-source CTI tools (MISP, OpenCTI, TheHive, Cortex) into a unified system with feed ingestion pipelines, enrichment workflows, STIX/TAXII interoperability, and analyst dashboards. Use when architecting or standing up a centralized CTI platform to collect, analyze, and disseminate threat intelligence across a security team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map advanced persistent threat (APT) group TTPs to the MITRE ATT&CK framework using the attackcti Python library to query STIX/TAXII data for group-technique associations, then generate ATT&CK Navigator layer files to visualize and compare defensive coverage against adversary profiles. Use when profiling an APT group's techniques, building Navigator coverage heatmaps, or assessing technique coverage gaps against a specific threat actor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an automated adversary infrastructure tracking system in Python (dnspython, python-whois, shodan, networkx) that pivots across passive DNS, certificate transparency logs, WHOIS records, and IP enrichment to map threat-actor C2 networks and flag newly registered domains matching known patterns. Use when pivoting from known indicators to discover related C2 infrastructure or maintaining a continuously updated map of a threat actor's network.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes structured and unstructured threat intelligence feeds to extract actionable indicators, adversary tactics, and campaign context. Use when ingesting commercial or open-source CTI feeds, evaluating feed quality, normalizing data into STIX 2.1 format, or enriching existing IOCs with campaign attribution. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, Mandiant Advantage, MISP, AlienVault OTX, or automated feed aggregation pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator visualizations for threat-intel reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for STRIDE threat modeling, DREAD risk scoring, data-flow-diagram threat analysis, or a quick secret scan — or when a security request needs routing to the right specialist skill (pen-testing, incident response, cloud posture, red team, AI security, threat hunting, secure code review). This skill owns threat modeling; everything else routes to a sibling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the threat-modeling phase of a security scan, the user explicitly invokes $threat-model, or the user explicitly asks to create, update, or persist a repository threat model. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the threat-modeling phase of a security scan, the user explicitly invokes $threat-model, or the user explicitly asks to create, update, or persist a repository threat model. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an application or system — including one built quickly with AI coding agents — needs a security review with regulatory grounding: a STRIDE threat model, a LINDDUN privacy threat model, a dependency exposure screen against live CVE / CISA-KEV / EPSS data, or a selected, non-exhaustive screen of which EU security obligations (GDPR, NIS2, Cyber Resilience Act, AI Act) may apply and which need determination. Orchestrates the server-enforced threat-modeling workflows of the Ansvar Gateway MCP connector and grounds every regulatory statement in officially published text fetched at answer time — scope, role, and application-date limits stated, never a compliance verdict. Never simulates a workflow and never answers legal questions from model memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or refresh a STRIDE-based threat model for the current repository using Bug Hunter-native artifacts. Use whenever the repository has no threat model yet, the architecture changed materially, a security review needs fresh trust-boundary context, or the user explicitly asks for a threat model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IOC extraction, threat intelligence correlation, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, hunt hypothesis generation, and detection rule creation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct proactive, hypothesis-driven threat hunts — search SIEM / EDR / logs for adversaries who haven't tripped an alert yet. ATT&CK-driven, hypothesis-based methodology. Use when the user mentions 'threat hunting,' 'proactive hunt,' 'TaHiTI,' 'PEAK framework,' 'MITRE ATT&CK hunt,' 'hypothesis-driven hunt,' 'hunt hypothesis,' 'living off the land,' 'LOLBins,' 'beaconing,' 'lateral movement detection,' 'data staging,' 'persistence hunting,' or wants to find threats that have evaded existing detections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured threat-modeling session for a new feature, system, or architecture — STRIDE, attack trees, data flow diagrams, abuse cases. Use when the user mentions 'threat model,' 'threat modeling,' 'STRIDE,' 'attack tree,' 'abuse case,' 'data flow diagram,' 'DFD,' 'security architecture review,' 'security review,' 'design review,' 'pre-implementation security,' 'shift left,' 'what could go wrong,' or needs strategic security thinking before code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct structured threat modeling for software systems using established methodologies to identify, prioritize, and mitigate security threats before they are exploited. Use when the user requests threat modeling or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the threat-modeling phase of a security scan, the user explicitly invokes $threat-model, or the user explicitly asks to create, update, or persist a repository threat model. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement layered collective defense using alarm signaling, role mobilization, and proportional response. Covers threat detection, alert propagation, immune response patterns, escalation tiers, and post-incident recovery for distributed systems and organizations. Use when designing defense-in-depth where no single guardian covers all threats, building incident response that scales with severity, or when current defense is over-reactive to every alert or under-reactive to genuine threats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured threat assessment methodology. Intent + Capability + Opportunity = Threat Level. Use when formally evaluating a threat. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need Liberty91 platform intelligence — what actually happened (deduplicated Threat Events with every source, Admiralty reliability/credibility and verification stage), whether an IOC is already known to your account, the canonical threat library (actors, malware, vulnerabilities, clusters, ATT&CK TTPs), alert matches, or which of your customer organizations an occurrence affects — or when you need to push intelligence back: ingesting your own report, generating an intelligence package, or uploading an organization document. Also supplies event provenance fields, when the platform returns them, and Threat Library alias resolution to /source-provenance and /quality-of-information-check. Two-way, first-party integration. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation and friends, /ioc-enrichment-workflow, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /vulnerability-intelligence. Reads $LIBERTY91_API_KEY.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need authoritative classification, threat-name, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, dynamic-analysis or sandbox results on a file hash, or when you need network threat intelligence for a URL/domain/IP from ReversingLabs Spectra Analyze (A1000). Returns verdict, risk score, AV detection ratio, threat name, behavioural tags, and pivot candidates (parent containers, extracted files, related samples by family). Commonly invoked by /hash-investigation and /malware-analysis. Other agents/skills can chain this for deeper malware enrichment beyond VirusTotal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence on an indicator (IOC reputation for an IP, domain, hash, or URL — malicious confidence, linked actors, malware families, reports) OR on an adversary (threat-actor profile, origin/target search, MITRE ATT&CK TTPs, finished intel reports). Answers questions like "look up 1.1.1.1", "what TTPs does Charming Kitten use?", "which threat actors operate from Russia?", and "latest report on Mustang Panda". Commonly invoked by the four /*-investigation skills, /ioc-enrichment-workflow, /threat-actor-profiling, and the regional espionage cells. Other agents/skills can chain this for vendor-authoritative actor and finished-intel context. Requires a Falcon Intelligence subscription.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enriches indicators with context from threat-intel sources: planning lookups against reputation, passive DNS, WHOIS, and sandbox/sample databases, scoring confidence, and avoiding operational-security mistakes that tip off adversaries. Activates for requests to enrich IOCs, add threat context, or plan indicator lookups safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。