「threat-model」の検索結果

Build a mental and visual map of the target application before hunting — entry points, trust boundaries, data flows, and high-value functionality. Use when user has scope parsed and wants to plan WHERE to hunt rather than diving into recon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full penetration test using MCP tools — recon, scanning, exploitation, and reporting. Tailored for OpenCode (BYO LLM). Supports network/web targets and local codebases. Chains into analyze-cve, threat-modeling, and remediate skills automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

White-box source code security review structured around OWASP ASVS 5.0 (427 verification requirements across 16 chapters). Reads and understands application source code to build a security-aware knowledge base that enriches all downstream skills. Covers: tech stack identification, route/endpoint mapping, authentication and authorization architecture, dangerous function patterns, source-to-sink data flow tracing, IaC review, dependency analysis, ASVS compliance mapping, and LLM integration security (prompt injection, tool abuse, output handling, RAG poisoning, MCP server patterns). When LLM/AI framework usage is detected, automatically reviews OWASP LLM Top 10 patterns from source code and chains into /ai-redteam with white-box context for live endpoint testing. Chains into /pentester, /threat-modeling, /web-exploit, /api-security, /cloud-security, /analyze-cve, /credential-audit, and /ai-redteam — providing white-box context that transforms black-box testing into targeted, informed assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevent common AI report pitfalls — bug blending, inflated threat models, and generic language. Train Claude with your best past reports for concise, technical submissions. Based on Critical Thinking Bug Bounty Podcast Episode 166.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a threat model document. Use when the user says "threat model", "threat modeling", "STRIDE analysis", "attack surface analysis", "security design review", "what are the threats to this system", "adversarial analysis", "identify threats", "security threat assessment", or needs to systematically identify and document threats to a system or feature - even if they don't explicitly say "threat model".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced vulnerability analysis principles. OWASP Top 10 baseline + current threat landscape awareness, Supply Chain Security, attack surface mapping, risk prioritization. Use when performing security audits, threat modeling, or OWASP reviews. NOT for STRIDE/CSO-mode infrastructure audits (see mk:cso).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chief Security Officer mode. Infrastructure-first security audit: secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, CI/CD pipeline security, LLM/AI security, skill supply chain scanning, plus OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat modeling, and active verification. Two modes: daily (zero-noise, 8/10 confidence gate) and comprehensive (monthly deep scan, 2/10 bar). Trend tracking across audit runs. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Practical security review and hardening guidance for application code in Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a security review or audit, wants to harden authentication (password hashing, sessions, JWT, OAuth2/OIDC, MFA), fix OWASP Top 10 issues (injection, XSS, IDOR, CSRF, SSRF, deserialization), threat-model with STRIDE, clean up secrets and .env handling, or set up dependency scanning (pip-audit, npm audit, osv-scanner, gitleaks, SBOM). Also trigger for "make this secure", "is this safe to deploy", bcrypt/argon2id, rate limiting logins, RBAC/ABAC, CSP and security headers, cookie flags, and secure-by-default coding help.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding auth, webhooks, uploads, queues, secrets, tenant boundaries, or public endpoints — produces trust boundaries + abuse cases mapped to files, BEFORE implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit — vulnerability scan, pentest review, attack-surface sweep; explicit request only, not regular feature work. Pre-implementation threat pass → threat-modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Investigator OPSEC — threat-model who might notice you, control your attribution surface across IP, ASN, browser and TLS fingerprint, timing and logged-in accounts, separate research identity from… Use when setting up a research account, avoiding tipping off a subject, worrying about LinkedIn profile-view leakage, needing a burner phone or email, or hardening a research VM or browser profile

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Use when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a bounded security design/hardening pass for explicit security or threat-model intent, or a concrete auth/authorization/secret/untrusted-input/file-upload/sensitive-data risk; do not trigger for every input, data store, third-party call, implementation, review, or release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates comprehensive threat models using STRIDE methodology with asset identification, threat enumeration, mitigation strategies, and residual risk assessment. Use for "threat modeling", "security analysis", "STRIDE", or "risk assessment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。