141 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Apply an emotional resonance lens to a UI that is technically correct but flat, prescribing changes at the copy, motion, and interaction layer. Use when a design tests fine but lands cold. For the polish-perception argument, use `aesthetic-usability` (ui-design).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a diary study — prompts, cadence, duration, participant criteria, and analysis frame. Use when behaviour unfolds over days or weeks. For a single-session study, use `usability-test-plan`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and fix visual hierarchy, spacing, color, and depth in web UIs. Use when the user mentions "my UI looks off" (or amateur/unprofessional), "fix the design", "Tailwind styling", "color palette", "visual hierarchy", "design system", "spacing scale", or "component styling". Also trigger when building consistent design tokens, creating dark mode themes, improving data-visualization clarity, or polishing UI details before launch. Covers grayscale-first workflow, constrained design scales, shadows, and component styling. For typeface selection, see web-typography. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence. Use when the user mentions "Steve Jobs review", "design review", "product review", "what would Steve do", "insanely great", "this feels too complicated", "too many features", "product taste", "saying no", or "is this good enough to ship". Also trigger when critiquing a UI, feature, or roadmap for focus and simplicity, cutting scope to the essential, or pressure-testing the whole experience from first run to daily use. Covers the simplicity audit, the no list, design-is-how-it-works, end-to-end ownership, demo culture, and a Jobs-style review protocol with binary verdicts. For visual design fundamentals, see refactoring-ui. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics. For detail polish, see microinteractions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit websites and landing pages for conversion issues and design evidence-based A/B tests. Use when the user mentions "landing page isnt converting", "conversion rate", "A/B test", "why visitors leave", "objection handling", "bounce rate", "conversion funnel", "increase signups", or "people add to cart but dont buy". Also trigger when diagnosing why signups are low, designing experiment hypotheses, or auditing checkout flows for friction points. Covers funnel mapping, persuasion assets, and objection/counter-objection frameworks. For overall marketing strategy, see one-page-marketing. For usability issues, see ux-heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply foundational design principles: affordances, signifiers, constraints, feedback, and conceptual models. Use when the user mentions "why is this confusing", "affordance", "error prevention", "discoverability", "human-centered design", "mental model", "mapping", "seven stages of action", "users keep making mistakes", "this is unintuitive", or "people cant figure out how to use it". Also trigger when reducing product complexity or feature creep. Covers the gulfs of execution and evaluation. For usability scoring, see ux-heuristics. For iOS-specific patterns, see ios-hig-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided journey from a website with traffic it under-converts to a research-driven growth engine that captures more leads, persuades more buyers, sells a sharper offer, and earns referrals. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - cro-methodology, scorecard-marketing, storybrand-messaging, made-to-stick, influence-psychology, hundred-million-offers, contagious, one-page-marketing - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (WEBSITE.md, OFFER.md, MARKETING.md, GROW-WEBSITE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to raise conversion on a site that already has traffic, capture more leads, sharpen a weak offer, add referral loops, or says 'my site gets visitors but nobody buys'. If a broken funnel or usability friction is the real blocker, run improve-website first; if there is no site yet, use create-website; for one leaking flow, conversion-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a website, app, onboarding flow, or design for usability, conversion, and product problems, tying every finding to a business outcome and a severity. Use this to review an interface, diagnose low conversion or activation, find where users drop off, get structured product feedback, or decide which UX fixes to ship first. For raising visual quality rather than finding problems, use `interface-craft`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finds translational opportunities that connect basic-research discoveries to clinically meaningful use cases such as diagnosis, stratification, prognosis, treatment response prediction, monitoring, or therapeutic development. Use this skill when a user wants to turn a mechanism finding, pathway signal, cellular phenotype, experimental observation, or omics discovery into a stronger translational research direction. Always separate mechanistic relevance from translational usability, and never present a basic finding as clinically actionable unless the evidence supports that level.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end user research assistant — qualitative and quantitative. Use this skill whenever the user mentions user research, user interviews, discussion guides, interview guides, research plans, qualitative research, quantitative research, user surveys, survey design, usability studies, participant recruitment, research synthesis, interview transcripts, research reports, running studies with AI, or explicitly mentions Cookiy AI. Also trigger when users want to talk to customers, conduct discovery research, create a study or survey, analyze interview data, run AI-moderated interviews, or collect survey responses. Covers the full lifecycle: planning studies, creating discussion guides, running AI-moderated interviews (real or synthetic) via Cookiy, designing and distributing surveys, and synthesizing results into reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether AI agents can actually use your product — docs, APIs, onboarding, errors, and discoverability, evaluated from a non-human user's perspective. Use when asked if a product is agent-ready, to audit a site or API for AI usability, to prepare for agentic traffic, or when agents keep failing against your product. Produces a scored readiness report with per-surface findings and a prioritised fix list. For optimising a single article for AI citation use aeo-optimizer; for designing the MCP server itself use mcp-server-spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Minimalist UX/Interaction Audit Expert that deconstructs complex interactions through cognitive load and operational efficiency lenses. Use this skill when you need to perform a UX walkthrough audit on a Figma prototype or web interface, evaluating usability based on principles like fewer clicks, less UI elements, no hidden logic, and self-explanatory design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Walk through a live web app AS a real user to find usability + behavioural bugs that static reviews miss. REQUIRES proof of interaction (typing, clicking, sending, observing) before any verdict — a sweep that didn't interact terminates with verdict 'Incomplete'. Walks threads, exercises every element, runs the multi-pane stress matrix, visual polish sweep, component perfection checklist, automated a11y (axe-core), pragmatic performance budget (LCP/CLS/INP), scenario battery (11 scenarios), and stress recipes including the real-flavour data battery. Hard gates: console errors/warnings = 0, network 5xx = 0, layout collapse = 0, axe Critical/Serious = 0, perf budget green. Audit-the-audit meta-check rejects rushed reports. Each finding has reproduction steps, evidence path, and suspected code location. Trigger with 'ux audit', 'walkthrough', 'qa sweep', 'audit the app', 'dogfood this', 'check all pages', 'find what's broken', 'stress the UI'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a web app or page for visual design quality — layout, typography, spacing, colour, hierarchy, consistency, interaction patterns, and responsive behaviour. Not a UX audit (that checks usability) — this checks whether it looks professional and polished. Produces a design findings report with screenshots. Triggers: 'design review', 'does this look good', 'review the design', 'check the layout', 'is this polished', 'visual review', 'design audit', 'make it look better', 'it looks off'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to optimize for mobile-first indexing or fix mobile usability. Also use when the user mentions "mobile-friendly," "mobile-first indexing," "mobile SEO," "responsive design," "mobile adaptation," "mobile viewport," "viewport meta," "touch targets," "font size mobile," "AMP," or "Accelerated Mobile Pages." For viewport meta, use page-metadata.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits existing table permissions on a Power Pages site by analyzing them against site code and Dataverse metadata, then GRADES the configuration with deterministic 1–5 scores across 3 security/usability/correctness categories (9 dimensions). Detection is anchored by a recurring-issue catalog so findings and severities stay consistent run-to-run. Generates an HTML report with an at-a-glance verdict and per-category scores in the Overview plus a single list of **major/minor** issues (each major issue labelled permissions-only or upstream-caused with a short justification), and suggested fixes. Use when the user wants to review, verify, check, score, or grade table permissions for security issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a comprehensive technical SEO audit covering crawlability, indexability, rendering, site architecture, structured data, page experience, security, and internationalization. Use this skill whenever the user asks about technical SEO, crawl issues, indexing problems, sitemaps, robots.txt, canonical tags, schema markup, page speed, Core Web Vitals, hreflang, redirects, or site-wide search performance. Triggers on technical SEO, site audit, crawlability, indexability, sitemap, robots.txt, canonical, redirect chain, schema, JSON-LD, Core Web Vitals, page speed, hreflang, mobile usability, HTTPS, security headers, render-blocking, JavaScript SEO. Also triggers when a site has indexing problems, traffic drops, or migration concerns, even if 'technical SEO' is not said explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Product design across UI/UX, design systems, prototyping, and user research. Use when creating user journey maps, building wireframes, defining design tokens and component systems, planning usability tests, or establishing design principles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Naming conventions, API ergonomics, and usability patterns for functional code
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your product + design brain trust and decision partner. Named personas across 8 cells spanning product strategy, discovery/research, growth/metrics, design foundations/usability, design leadership/craft, UX/content, design systems, and a…
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete UI/UX design capability — a wiki-style knowledge map of design theory (UX laws, Nielsen heuristics, usability, visual hierarchy, typography, contrast/WCAG, design systems, aesthetics-vs-conversion) fused with a hands-on execution playbook for building distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces. Use when designing or building any UI (websites, landing pages, dashboards, components, apps), reviewing or critiquing UI/UX, diagnosing why a design doesn't convert, or styling/beautifying web interfaces. Grounds every visual decision in UX principles and avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a scored heuristic critique of the UI using Nielsen's 10 + 6 design laws + optional persona walkthroughs. Outputs a machine-parseable scorecard plus a 0-100 UsabilityScore (the judged companion to the deterministic UICraftScore). Invoke when the user asks for heuristic on their UI, or mentions 'heuristic' alongside design / UI / frontend work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Amplify safe or boring designs to make them more visually interesting and stimulating. Increases impact while maintaining usability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a feature and enhance it with purposeful animations, micro-interactions, and motion effects that improve usability and delight.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。